Skip to main content

Responsible Authorship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Getting to Good

Abstract

While authorship is perhaps the major source of credit for scientific work, it also carries major ethical responsibilities of vouching for the accuracy and integrity of the conduct of research and the resulting publications. Authorship credit can be highly contested with few guidelines or sources for the adjudication of disputes. Still, even without a single algorithm to determine authorship, addressing authorship and authorship priority at the beginning of an inquiry can reduce the potential for disagreements and disappointment later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Kennedy M, Barnsteiner J, Daly J. Honorary and ghost authorship in nursing publications. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014;46:416–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matheson A. The ICMJE Recommendations and pharmaceutical marketing – strengths, weaknesses and the unsolved problem of attribution in publication ethics. BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Oermann M, Conklin J, Nicholl L, Chinn P, Ashton K, Edie A, Amarasekara S, Budinger S. Study of predatory open access nursing journals. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;48:624–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman J, House M. Authorship issues and conflict in the U.S. academic chemical community. Account Res. 2015;22:346–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Additional Suggested Reading

  • Carmichael K, Nolan S, Weston J, Smith C, Marson A. Assessment of the quality of harms reporting in non-randomised studies and randomised controlled studies of topiramate for the treatment of epilepsy using CONSORT criteria. Epilepsy Res. 2015;114:106–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson S, Helgesson G. The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Med Health Care Philos. 2017;20:163–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caplan, A.L., Redman, B.K. (2018). Responsible Authorship. In: Caplan, A., Redman, B. (eds) Getting to Good. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51357-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51358-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics