Skip to main content

Human Subjects’ Protection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Getting to Good

Abstract

Federal regulations for protection of human subjects in biomedical and behavioral research have been in place since 1974. Preceded by the Belmont Report, which described ethical principles for human research, regulations known as the Common Rule (common across federal agencies) followed. They may be found at 45 CFR 46 and are administered by the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP). Updated regulations have been approved and are expected to be in effect by early 2018.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DeMets DL, Ellenberg SS. Data monitoring committees – expect the unexpected. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(14):1365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grady C. Institutional review boards; purpose and challenges. Chest. 2015;148(5):1148–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan A, Forrest A, Uhlenbrauck G, Young S, McMinney R. Barriers to change in the informed consent process: a systematic literature review. IRB. 2016;38(3):1–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls SG, Hayes TP, Brehaut JC, McDonald M, Weijer C, Saginur R, Fergusson D. A scoping review of empirical research relating to quality and effectiveness of research ethics review. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):E013639.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Suggested Reading

  • The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. 1979. (This is a foundational document which describes the ethical basis for human subjects protection in research.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady C. Institutional review boards; purpose and challenges. Chest 2015;148(5):1148–1155. (Provides a clear description of institutional review boards and the policies under which they operate.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan Z, Forrest A, Uhlenbrauck G, Young S, McKinney R. Barriers to change in the informed consent process: A systematic literature review. IRB. 2016 ;38(3):1–10. (Reviews research on informed consent in research and suggests steps to make it more robust.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caplan, A.L., Redman, B.K. (2018). Human Subjects’ Protection. In: Caplan, A., Redman, B. (eds) Getting to Good. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51357-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51358-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics