Skip to main content

Methodology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Getting to Good

Abstract

Research integrity is now being redefined to require a higher level of methodological quality than has historically been the case. Innovations to reach this new standard fall into several categories: increased use of alternative trial designs with questions about how subject protection can be applied; need to move away from ā€˜Pā€™ values and toward effect sizes in statistical analysis and full reporting of research methods including methods of analysis and modified endpoints. Driven by the recognition that the historically dominant standard of the randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) is not economically, politically, or scientifically always useful, new trial designs recognize the heterogeneity of disease, the need for timely answers in humanitarian emergencies or for the seriously ill, improvement in trial recruitment and receipt of appropriate treatment, and recognition of the need to synthesize information across trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berry D. Emerging innovations in clinical trial design. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99(1):82ā€“91.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Grinnell F. Research integrity and everyday practice of science. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19(3):193ā€“9.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Additional Suggested Reading

  • Berry D. Emerging innovations in clinical trial design. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99(1):82ā€“91. (Provides a review of emerging clinical trial designs driven by increasing recognition that diseases and patients are heterogeneous.)

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Grinnell F. Research integrity and everyday practice of science. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19(3):685ā€“701. (Notes that ā€œscience is traditionally taught as a linear process based on logic and carried out by objective researchers following the scientific methodā€ is not accurate. Research integrity should be taught as it is carried out in the everyday practice of science.)

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Weintraub W, Luscher T, Pocock S. The perils of surrogate endpoints. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(33):2212ā€“8. (Describes the difficult but necessary steps in validating surrogate endpoints.)

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caplan, A.L., Redman, B.K. (2018). Methodology. In: Caplan, A., Redman, B. (eds) Getting to Good. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51357-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51358-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics