Abstract
Research integrity is now being redefined to require a higher level of methodological quality than has historically been the case. Innovations to reach this new standard fall into several categories: increased use of alternative trial designs with questions about how subject protection can be applied; need to move away from āPā values and toward effect sizes in statistical analysis and full reporting of research methods including methods of analysis and modified endpoints. Driven by the recognition that the historically dominant standard of the randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) is not economically, politically, or scientifically always useful, new trial designs recognize the heterogeneity of disease, the need for timely answers in humanitarian emergencies or for the seriously ill, improvement in trial recruitment and receipt of appropriate treatment, and recognition of the need to synthesize information across trials.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berry D. Emerging innovations in clinical trial design. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99(1):82ā91.
Grinnell F. Research integrity and everyday practice of science. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19(3):193ā9.
Additional Suggested Reading
Berry D. Emerging innovations in clinical trial design. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99(1):82ā91. (Provides a review of emerging clinical trial designs driven by increasing recognition that diseases and patients are heterogeneous.)
Grinnell F. Research integrity and everyday practice of science. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19(3):685ā701. (Notes that āscience is traditionally taught as a linear process based on logic and carried out by objective researchers following the scientific methodā is not accurate. Research integrity should be taught as it is carried out in the everyday practice of science.)
Weintraub W, Luscher T, Pocock S. The perils of surrogate endpoints. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(33):2212ā8. (Describes the difficult but necessary steps in validating surrogate endpoints.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caplan, A.L., Redman, B.K. (2018). Methodology. In: Caplan, A., Redman, B. (eds) Getting to Good. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51357-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51358-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)