Abstract
Mountains are most diverse in terrain conditions, slope features, altitudinal and climatic variations. Watersheds present a variety of landscape features to lend a good case for the disparities in the socio-economic development in the mountains. These watersheds are different in shape and size. According to altitudinal variations, watershed area can be divided into valleys, mid slopes and ridges. People are interacting with in a watershed from up to down and down to up. But their socio-economic conditions are different in each zones. Therefore, Bino, a marginally located watershed from Uttarakhand state has been taken for the present micro-level study. The main purpose of the present study was to identify the spatial structure of socio-economic development and disparities in the level of development of the Bino watershed. Indicators of development levels were chosen in the light of the ongoing development in the study area. Present study was based on primary and secondary data collected from various sources. The bulk of database comprises village-wise (198) information on wide variety of indicators. The composite level of development indicates that maximum 51.51% villages of the study area were under moderate level (40–60 index group) of development which covers maximum 48.94% population of the watershed. The second highest category of villages (27.78%) falls in the index group of 60–80 (high level) followed by 20–40 (low level) group i.e. 14.14%. Very low share of villages falls in the highest (4.04%) and lowest (2.53%) groups of development. It was noted that higher level of development covers lower share of villages (16.67%) but covers high share (27.11%) of population. Beside this low level of development covers high share of villages (31.82%) but it covers low share (32.94%) of population. Whole analysis is concluded that 73.23% villages are below average level of development while only 26.78% villages are above the average level of development in the Bino watershed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Babita, (2006). Regional disparities in social-economic development of upper Ganga-Yamuna Doab. Unpublished D. Phil. thesis in Economics, C.C.S. University, Meerut.
Chauniyal, S. (2011). Population, resource dynamics and socio economic development: A case study of Bino watershed. Unpublished D. Phil Thesis in Economics, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal) Uttarakhand.
Gosal, G. S., & Krishnan, G. (1979). Regional disparities in levels of socio-economic development in Punjab. Chandigarh: Department of Geography, Punjab University.
Gupta A. K. (1978). Regional and dimensional imbalances in agricultural development in Punjab, Haryana and Bihar. M. Phil Thesis, CSRD, JNU, New Delhi.
Haq, M. U. (1976). The poverty curtain; choice for the third word. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Krishnan, G. (1981). Issue of social development. Paper presented to the seminar on Strategy for Rural Development in Western India. ICSSR, Punjab University Chandigarh.
Mamgain, R. P. (2007a). Employment, migration and livelihoods in the hill economy of Uttaranchal. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis in Economics. Centre for the Study of Regional Development School of Social Sciences, JNU. New Delhi.
Mamgain, R. P. (2007b). Growth, poverty and employment. Working paper no. 39, Institute for Human Development, New Delhi. P4.
Mishra, S. K., & Chopra, A. (1979). Dimension of inter-district disparities in level of development in M.P. Indian Geographical Journal, 53(1), 14–26.
Pal, M. N. (1966). Differential regional pattern of consumption of commodities in India. AICC Economi Review.
Papola, T. S. (2002). Poverty in mountain areas of the Hindu Kush-Himalayas: Some basic issues in measurement, diagnosis and ALleviation. Talking points 2/02, ICIMOD, Kathmandu.
Raza, M. (1975). Measurement of regional disparities in developing countries with special reference to India. In R. khan., et al (Eds.), India and Soviet Union. Allied Publishers, Bombay.
Sen, L. K., et al. (1972). Reading on micro-level planning and rural growth center. Hyderabad: NICD.
Sharma, H. R., Sharma, R. K., & Kumar, V. (2001). Diversification of rural economy: Effect on income, consumption and poverty. Asian Economic Review, 43(1), 107–114.
Singh, R. (1985). A study of integrated area development in Syalde and salt blocks, Almora District (U.P.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chauniyal, S., Chauniyal, D.D. (2017). Level of Socio-economic Development in the Mountain Watershed of Uttarakhand State (India). In: Chand, R., Nel, E., Pelc, S. (eds) Societies, Social Inequalities and Marginalization. Perspectives on Geographical Marginality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50998-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50998-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50997-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50998-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)