Abstract
Directed evolution (DE) creates diversity in subsequent rounds of mutagenesis in the quest of increased protein stability, substrate binding, and catalysis. Although this technique does not require any structural/mechanistic knowledge of the system, the frequency of improved mutations is usually low. For this reason, computational tools are increasingly used to focus the search in sequence space, enhancing the efficiency of laboratory evolution. In particular, molecular modeling methods provide a unique tool to grasp the sequence/structure/function relationship of the protein to evolve, with the only condition that a structural model is provided. With this book chapter, we tried to guide the reader through the state of the art of molecular modeling, discussing their strengths, limitations, and directions. In addition, we suggest a possible future template for in silico directed evolution where we underline two main points: a hierarchical computational protocol combining several different techniques and a synergic effort between simulations and experimental validation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schmid A, Dordick JS, Hauer B, Kiener A, Wubbolts M, Witholt B (2001) Industrial biocatalysis today and tomorrow. Nature 409(6817):258–268
Patel RN (2008) Synthesis of chiral pharmaceutical intermediates by biocatalysis. Coord Chem Rev 252(5–7):659–701
Sukumaran J, Hanefeld U (2005) Enantioselective C-C bond synthesis catalysed by enzymes. Chem Soc Rev 34(6):530–542
Koenig SH, Brown RD (1972) H(2)CO(3) as substrate for carbonic anhydrase in the dehydration of HCO(3)(−). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 69(9):2422–2425
Bar-Even A, Noor E, Savir Y, Liebermeister W, Davidi D, Tawfik DS, Milo R (2011) The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. Biochemistry 50(21):4402–4410
Milo R, Last RL (2012) Achieving diversity in the face of constraints: lessons from metabolism. Science 336(6089):1663–1667
Currin A, Swainston N, Day PJ, Kell DB (2015) Synthetic biology for the directed evolution of protein biocatalysts: navigating sequence space intelligently. Chem Soc Rev 44(5):1172–1239
Gutte B, Däumigen M, Wittschieber E (1979) Design, synthesis and characterisation of a 34-residue polypeptide that interacts with nucleic acids. Nature 281(5733):650–655
Russell AJ, Fersht AR (1987) Rational modification of enzyme catalysis by engineering surface charge. Nature 328(6130):496–500
Hellinga HW, Caradonna JP, Richards FM (1991) Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure: II. Grafting of a buried transition metal binding site into Escherichia coli thioredoxin. J Mol Biol 222(3):787–803
Jemli S, Ayadi-Zouari D, Hlima HB, Bejar S (2016) Biocatalysts: application and engineering for industrial purposes. Crit Rev Biotechnol 36(2):246–258
Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Bradley P, Misura K, Baker D (2005) Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions. Science 310(5748):638–642
Steiner K, Schwab H (2012) Recent advances in rational approaches for enzyme engineering. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2:e201209010
Richardson JS, Richardson DC (1989) The de novo design of protein structures. Trends Biochem Sci 14(7):304–309
Ponder JW, Richards FM (1987) Tertiary templates for proteins: use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol 193(4):775–791
Bolon DN, Marcus JS, Ross SA, Mayo SL (2003) Prudent modeling of core polar residues in computational protein design. J Mol Biol 329(3):611–622
Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL (1997) Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94(19):10172–10177
Desjarlais JR, Handel TM (1999) Side-chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design1. J Mol Biol 290(1):305–318
Scrutton NS, Berry A, Perham RN (1990) Redesign of the coenzyme specificity of a dehydrogenase by protein engineering. Nature 343(6253):38–43
Carter P, Nilsson B, Burnier JP, Burdick D, Wells JA (1989) Engineering subtilisin BPN’ for site-specific proteolysis. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 6(3):240–248
Wells JA, Powers DB, Bott RR, Graycar TP, Estell DA (1987) Designing substrate specificity by protein engineering of electrostatic interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84(5):1219–1223
Cedrone F, Ménez A, Quéméneur E (2000) Tailoring new enzyme functions by rational redesign. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10(4):405–410
Looger LL, Dwyer MA, Smith JJ, Hellinga HW (2003) Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature 423(6936):185–190
Craik C, Largman C, Fletcher T, Roczniak S, Barr P, Fletterick R, Rutter W (1985) Redesigning trypsin: alteration of substrate specificity. Science 228(4697):291–297
Bastianelli G, Bouillon A, Nguyen C, Crublet E, Pêtres S, Gorgette O, Le-Nguyen D, Barale J-C, Nilges M (2011) Computational reverse-engineering of a spider-venom derived peptide active against Plasmodium falciparum SUB1. PLoS ONE 6(7):e21812
Oelschlaeger P, Mayo SL (2005) Hydroxyl groups in the ββ sandwich of metallo-β-lactamases favor enzyme activity: a computational protein design study. J Mol Biol 350(3):395–401
Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L (2002) Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J Mol Biol 320(2):369–387
Yu H, Huang H (2014) Engineering proteins for thermostability through rigidifying flexible sites. Biotechnol Adv 32(2):308–315
Kuhlman B, Baker D (2004) Exploring folding free energy landscapes using computational protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14(1):89–95
Kortemme T, Baker D (2004) Computational design of protein–protein interactions. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8(1):91–97
Kortemme T, Joachimiak LA, Bullock AN, Schuler AD, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2004) Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11(4):371–379
Reina J, Lacroix E, Hobson SD, Fernandez-Ballester G, Rybin V, Schwab MS, Serrano L, Gonzalez C (2002) Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences. Nat Struct Mol Biol 9(8):621–627
Shifman JM, Mayo SL (2002) Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design. J Mol Biol 323(3):417–423
Lippow SM, Tidor B (2007) Progress in computational protein design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18(4):305–311
Ashworth J, Havranek JJ, Duarte CM, Sussman D, Monnat RJ, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2006) Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity. Nature 441(7093):656–659
Chevalier BS, Kortemme T, Chadsey MS, Baker D, Monnat RJ Jr, Stoddard BL (2002) Design, activity, and structure of a highly specific artificial endonuclease. Mol Cell 10(4):895–905
Cochran FV, Wu SP, Wang W, Nanda V, Saven JG, Therien MJ, DeGrado WF (2005) Computational de novo design and characterization of a four-helix bundle protein that selectively binds a nonbiological cofactor. J Am Chem Soc 127(5):1346–1347
Yang W, Wilkins AL, Ye Y, Z-r L, S-y L, Urbauer JL, Hellinga HW, Kearney A, van der Merwe PA, Yang JJ (2005) Design of a calcium-binding protein with desired structure in a cell adhesion molecule. J Am Chem Soc 127(7):2085–2093
Palmer AE, Giacomello M, Kortemme T, Hires SA, Lev-Ram V, Baker D, Tsien RY (2006) Ca2+ indicators based on computationally redesigned calmodulin-peptide pairs. Chem Biol 13(5):521–530
Lassila JK, Keeffe JR, Oelschlaeger P, Mayo SL (2005) Computationally designed variants of Escherichia coli chorismate mutase show altered catalytic activity. Protein Eng Des Sel 18(4):161–163
Bornscheuer UT, Pohl M (2001) Improved biocatalysts by directed evolution and rational protein design. Curr Opin Chem Biol 5(2):137–143
Faiella M, Andreozzi C, de Rosales RTM, Pavone V, Maglio O, Nastri F, DeGrado WF, Lombardi A (2009) An artificial di-iron oxo-protein with phenol oxidase activity. Nat Chem Biol 5(12):882–884
Tinberg CE, Khare SD, Dou J, Doyle L, Nelson JW, Schena A, Jankowski W, Kalodimos CG, Johnsson K, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2013) Computational design of ligand binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity. Nature 501(7466):212–216
Kaplan J, DeGrado WF (2004) De novo design of catalytic proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(32):11566–11570
Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL (1997) De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 278(5335):82–87
Jiang L, Althoff EA, Clemente FR, Doyle L, Röthlisberger D, Zanghellini A, Gallaher JL, Betker JL, Tanaka F, Barbas CF, Hilvert D, Houk KN, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2008) De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science (New York, NY) 319(5868):1387–1391
Rothlisberger D, Khersonsky O, Wollacott AM, Jiang L, DeChancie J, Betker J, Gallaher JL, Althoff EA, Zanghellini A, Dym O, Albeck S, Houk KN, Tawfik DS, Baker D (2008) Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453(7192):190–195
Moroz YS, Dunston TT, Makhlynets OV, Moroz OV, Wu Y, Yoon JH, Olsen AB, McLaughlin JM, Mack KL, Gosavi PM, van Nuland NAJ, Korendovych IV (2015) New tricks for old proteins: single mutations in a nonenzymatic protein give rise to various enzymatic activities. J Am Chem Soc 137(47):14905–14911
Zanghellini A (2014) De novo computational enzyme design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 29:132–138
Petrounia IP, Arnold FH (2000) Designed evolution of enzymatic properties. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11(4):325–330
Arnold FH (2001) Combinatorial and computational challenges for biocatalyst design. Nature 409(6817):253–257
Minshull J, Willem Stemmer PC (1999) Protein evolution by molecular breeding. Curr Opin Chem Biol 3(3):284–290
Packer MS, Liu DR (2015) Methods for the directed evolution of proteins. Nat Rev Genet 16(7):379–394
Jaeger K-E, Eggert T (2004) Enantioselective biocatalysis optimized by directed evolution. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15(4):305–313
Jestin J-L, Kaminski PA (2004) Directed enzyme evolution and selections for catalysis based on product formation. J Biotechnol 113(103):85
Tao H, Cornish VW (2002) Milestones in directed enzyme evolution. Curr Opin Chem Biol 6(6):858–864
Williams GJ, Nelson AS, Berry A (2004) Directed evolution of enzymes for biocatalysis and the life sciences. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 61(24):3034–3046
Dalby PA (2003) Optimising enzyme function by directed evolution. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13(4):500–505
Bershtein S, Tawfik DS (2008) Advances in laboratory evolution of enzymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 12(2):151–158
Park S, Morley KL, Horsman GP, Holmquist M, Hult K, Kazlauskas RJ (2005) Focusing mutations into the P. fluorescens esterase binding site increases enantioselectivity more effectively than distant mutations. Chem Biol 12 (1):45–54
Strausberg SL, Ruan B, Fisher KE, Alexander PA, Bryan PN (2005) Directed coevolution of stability and catalytic activity in calcium-free subtilisin. Biochemistry 44(9):3272–3279
Chockalingam K, Chen Z, Katzenellenbogen JA, Zhao H (2005) Directed evolution of specific receptor–ligand pairs for use in the creation of gene switches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(16):5691–5696
Chica RA, Doucet N, Pelletier JN (2005) Semi-rational approaches to engineering enzyme activity: combining the benefits of directed evolution and rational design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16(4):378–384
Hill CM, Li W-S, Thoden JB, Holden HM, Raushel FM (2003) Enhanced degradation of chemical warfare agents through molecular engineering of the phosphotriesterase active site. J Am Chem Soc 125(30):8990–8991
Reetz MT, Carballeira JD (2007) Iterative saturation mutagenesis (ISM) for rapid directed evolution of functional enzymes. Nat Protocol 2(4):891–903
Lutz S, Patrick WM (2004) Novel methods for directed evolution of enzymes: quality, not quantity. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15(4):291–297
Lutz S (2010) Beyond directed evolution–semi-rational protein engineering and design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21(6):734–743
Lippow SM, Moon TS, Basu S, Yoon S-H, Li X, Chapman BA, Robison K, Lipovšek D, Prather KLJ (2010) Engineering enzyme specificity using computational design of a defined-sequence library. Chem Biol 17(12):1306–1315
Sebestova E, Bendl J, Brezovsky J, Damborský J (2014) Computational tools for designing smart libraries. Methods Mol Biol 1179:291–314
Voigt CA, Mayo SL, Arnold FH, Wang Z-G (2001) Computationally focusing the directed evolution of proteins. J Cell Biochem 84(S37):58–63
Zaugg J, Gumulya Y, Gillam EM, Boden M (2014) Computational tools for directed evolution: a comparison of prospective and retrospective strategies. Methods Mol Biol 1179:315–333
Damborsky J, Brezovsky J (2009) Computational tools for designing and engineering biocatalysts. Curr Opin Chem Biol 13(1):26–34
Pei J (2008) Multiple protein sequence alignment. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18(3):382–386
Pavelka A, Chovancova E, Damborsky J (2009) HotSpot Wizard: a web server for identification of hot spots in protein engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 37(suppl 2):W376–W383
Kuipers RK, Joosten H-J, van Berkel WJH, Leferink NGH, Rooijen E, Ittmann E, van Zimmeren F, Jochens H, Bornscheuer U, Vriend G, Martins dos Santos VAP, Schaap PJ (2010) 3DM: systematic analysis of heterogeneous superfamily data to discover protein functionalities. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 78(9):2101–2113
Jochens H, Bornscheuer UT (2010) Natural diversity to guide focused directed evolution. ChemBioChem 11(13):1861–1866
Goldsmith M, Tawfik DS (2012) Directed enzyme evolution: beyond the low-hanging fruit. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22(4):406–412
Barak Y, Nov Y, Ackerley DF, Matin A (2007) Enzyme improvement in the absence of structural knowledge: a novel statistical approach. ISME J 2(2):171–179
Rosenberg M, Goldblum A (2006) Computational protein design: a novel path to future protein drugs. Curr Pharm Des 12(31):3973–3997
Poole AM, Ranganathan R (2006) Knowledge-based potentials in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16(4):508–513
Koder RL, Dutton PL (2006) Intelligent design: the de novo engineering of proteins with specified functions. Dalton Trans 25:3045–3051
Butterfoss GL, Kuhlman B (2006) Computer-based design of novel protein structures. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 35(1):49–65
Ambroggio XI, Kuhlman B (2006) Design of protein conformational switches. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16(4):525–530
Vizcarra CL, Mayo SL (2005) Electrostatics in computational protein design. Curr Opin Chem Biol 9(6):622–626
Morin A, Meiler J, Mizoue LS (2011) Computational design of protein-ligand interfaces: potential in therapeutic development. Trends Biotechnol 29(4):159–166
Malisi C, Schumann M, Toussaint NC, Kageyama J, Kohlbacher O, Höcker B (2012) Binding pocket optimization by computational protein design. PLoS ONE 7(12):e52505
Saven JG (2011) Computational protein design: engineering molecular diversity, nonnatural enzymes, nonbiological cofactor complexes, and membrane proteins. Curr Opin Chem Biol 15(3):452–457
Ollikainen N, Smith CA, Fraser JS, Kortemme T (2013) Methods in enzymology: “Flexible backbone sampling methods to model and design protein alternative conformations”. Methods Enzymol 523:61–85
Park S, Yang X, Saven JG (2004) Advances in computational protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14(4):487–494
Samish I, MacDermaid CM, Perez-Aguilar JM, Saven JG (2011) Theoretical and computational protein design. Annu Rev Phys Chem 62(1):129–149
Smith RD, Damm-Ganamet KL, Dunbar JB, Ahmed A, Chinnaswamy K, Delproposto JE, Kubish GM, Tinberg CE, Khare SD, Dou J, Doyle L, Stuckey JA, Baker D, Carlson HA (2015) CSAR benchmark exercise 2013: evaluation of results from a combined computational protein design, docking, and scoring/ranking challenge. J Chem Inf Model ASAP 56:1022
Wijma HJ, Janssen DB (2013) Computational design gains momentum in enzyme catalysis engineering. FEBS J 280(13):2948–2960
Boas FE, Harbury PB (2007) Potential energy functions for protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17(2):199–204
Boas FE, Harbury PB (2008) Design of protein-ligand binding based on the molecular-mechanics energy model. J Mol Biol 380(2):415–424
Sirin S, Pearlman DA, Sherman W (2014) Physics-based enzyme design: predicting binding affinity and catalytic activity. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 82(12):3397–3409
Wickstrom L, Gallicchio E, Levy RM (2012) The linear interaction energy method for the prediction of protein stability changes upon mutation. Proteins 80(1):111–125
Mendes J, Guerois R, Serrano L (2002) Energy estimation in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12(4):441–446
Schneider M, Fu X, Keating AE (2009) X-ray vs. NMR structures as templates for computational protein design. Proteins 77(1):97–110
Adamczyk AJ, Cao J, Kamerlin SCL, Warshel A (2011) Catalysis by dihydrofolate reductase and other enzymes arises from electrostatic preorganization, not conformational motions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(34):14115–14120
Gagné D, French Rachel L, Narayanan C, Simonović M, Agarwal Pratul K, Doucet N (2015) Perturbation of the conformational dynamics of an active-site loop alters enzyme activity. Structure 23(12):2256–2266
Bhabha G, Lee J, Ekiert DC, Gam J, Wilson IA, Dyson HJ, Benkovic SJ, Wright PE (2011) A dynamic knockout reveals that conformational fluctuations influence the chemical step of enzyme catalysis. Science 332(6026):234–238
Allen BD, Nisthal A, Mayo SL (2010) Experimental library screening demonstrates the successful application of computational protein design to large structural ensembles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(46):19838–19843
Fu X, Apgar JR, Keating AE (2007) Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel α-helical ligands for Bcl-xL. J Mol Biol 371(4):1099–1117
Smith CA, Kortemme T (2008) Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 380(4):742–756
Lassila JK (2010) Conformational diversity and computational enzyme design. Curr Opin Chem Biol 14(5):676–682
Mandell DJ, Kortemme T (2009) Backbone flexibility in computational protein design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20(4):420–428
Marrink SJ, Risselada HJ, Yefimov S, Tieleman DP, De Vries AH (2007) The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B 111(27):7812–7824
Bowen JP, Allinger NL (2007) Molecular mechanics: the art and science of parameterization. Rev Comput Chem 2:81–97
Doruker P, Atilgan AR, Bahar I (2000) Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: application to α-amylase inhibitor. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 40(3):512–524
Berendsen H (1988) Dynamic simulation as an essential tool in molecular modeling. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2(3):217–221
Grossman J, Towles B, Greskamp B, Shaw DE (2015) Filtering, reductions and synchronization in the anton 2 network. In: Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), 2015 IEEE International. IEEE, pp 860–870
Rathore N, de Pablo JJ (2002) Monte Carlo simulation of proteins through a random walk in energy space. J Chem Phys 116(16):7225–7230
Borrelli KW, Vitalis A, Alcantara R, Guallar V (2005) PELE: protein energy landscape exploration. A novel Monte Carlo based technique. J Chem Theory Comput 1(6):1304–1311
Cabeza de Vaca I, Lucas MF, Guallar V (2015) New Monte Carlo based technique to study DNA–ligand interactions. J Chem Theory Comput 11(12):5598–5605
Borrelli KW, Cossins B, Guallar V (2010) Exploring hierarchical refinement techniques for induced fit docking with protein and ligand flexibility. J Comput Chem 31(6):1224–1235
Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R (2002) Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 47(4):409–443
Gao J, Truhlar DG (2002) Quantum mechanical methods for enzyme kinetics. Annu Rev Phys Chem 53(1):467–505
Korkegian A (2005) Computational thermostabilization of an enzyme. Science 308(5723):857–860
Kellogg EH, Leaver-Fay A, Baker D (2011) Role of conformational sampling in computing mutation-induced changes in protein structure and stability. Proteins 79(3):830–838
Dunbrack RL Jr (2002) Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12(4):431–440
Kuhlman B, Baker D (2000) Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(19):10383–10388
Potapov V, Cohen M, Schreiber G (2009) Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details. Protein Eng Des Sel 22(9):553–560
Estrada J, Echenique P, Sancho J (2015) Predicting stabilizing mutations in proteins using Poisson-Boltzmann based models: study of unfolded state ensemble models and development of a successful binary classifier based on residue interaction energies. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(46):31044–31054
Karplus M, Ichiye T, Pettitt BM (1987) Configurational entropy of native proteins. Biophys J 52(6):1083–1085
Chong S-H, Ham S (2015) Dissecting protein configurational entropy into conformational and vibrational contributions. J Phys Chem B 119(39):12623–12631
Frappier V, Chartier M, Najmanovich RJ (2015) ENCoM server: exploring protein conformational space and the effect of mutations on protein function and stability. Nucleic Acids Res 43(W1):W395–W400
Frappier V, Najmanovich RJ (2014) A coarse-grained elastic network atom contact model and its use in the simulation of protein dynamics and the prediction of the effect of mutations. PLoS Comput Biol 10(4):e1003569
Seeliger D, Daniel S, de Groot BL (2010) Protein thermostability calculations using alchemical free energy simulations. Biophys J 98(10):2309–2316
Huang X, Gao D, Zhan C-G (2011) Computational design of a thermostable mutant of cocaine esterase via molecular dynamics simulations. Org Biomol Chem 9(11):4138–4143
Joo JC, Pack SP, Kim YH, Yoo YJ (2011) Thermostabilization of Bacillus circulans xylanase: computational optimization of unstable residues based on thermal fluctuation analysis. J Biotechnol 151(1):56–65
Lee C-W, Wang H-J, Hwang J-K, Tseng C-P (2014) Protein thermal stability enhancement by designing salt bridges: a combined computational and experimental study. PLoS ONE 9(11):e112751
Pikkemaat MG, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC, Janssen DB (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations as a tool for improving protein stability. Protein Eng 15(3):185–192
Gribenko AV, Patel MM, Liu J, McCallum SA, Wang C, Makhatadze GI (2009) Rational stabilization of enzymes by computational redesign of surface charge-charge interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(8):2601–2606
Spector S, Wang M, Carp SA, Robblee J, Hendsch ZS, Fairman R, Tidor B, Raleigh DP (2000) Rational modification of protein stability by the mutation of charged surface residues. Biochemistry 39(5):872–879
Schweiker KL, Arash Z-A, Davidson AR, Makhatadze GI (2007) Computational design of the Fyn SH3 domain with increased stability through optimization of surface charge-charge interactions. Protein Sci 16(12):2694–2702
Borgo B, Havranek JJ (2012) Automated selection of stabilizing mutations in designed and natural proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(5):1494–1499
Hendsch ZS, Thorlakur J, Sauer RT, Bruce T (1996) Protein stabilization by removal of unsatisfied polar groups: computational approaches and experimental tests. Biochemistry 35(24):7621–7625
Koudelakova T, Chaloupkova R, Brezovsky J, Prokop Z, Sebestova E, Hesseler M, Khabiri M, Plevaka M, Kulik D, Kuta Smatanova I, Rezacova P, Ettrich R, Bornscheuer UT, Damborsky J (2013) Engineering enzyme stability and resistance to an organic cosolvent by modification of residues in the access tunnel. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 52(7):1959–1963
Wijma HJ, Floor RJ, Jekel PA, Baker D, Marrink SJ, Janssen DB (2014) Computationally designed libraries for rapid enzyme stabilization. Protein Eng Des Sel 27(2):49–58
Wijma HJ, Floor RJ, Janssen DB (2013) Structure- and sequence-analysis inspired engineering of proteins for enhanced thermostability. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23(4):588–594
Schreier B, Stumpp C, Wiesner S, Hocker B (2009) Computational design of ligand binding is not a solved problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(44):18491–18496
Allison B, Combs S, DeLuca S, Lemmon G, Mizoue L, Meiler J (2014) Computational design of protein-small molecule interfaces. J Struct Biol 185(2):193–202
Gainza P, Roberts KE, Georgiev I, Lilien RH, Keedy DA, Chen C-Y, Reza F, Anderson AC, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Donald BR (2013) OSPREY: protein design with ensembles, flexibility, and provable algorithms. Methods Enzymol 523:87–107
Keedy DA, Georgiev I, Triplett EB, Donald BR, Richardson DC, Richardson JS (2012) The role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations. PLoS Comput Biol 8(8):e1002629
Davis IW, Bryan Arendall W, Richardson DC, Richardson JS (2006) The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. Structure 14(2):265–274
Chen C-Y, Georgiev I, Anderson AC, Donald BR (2009) Computational structure-based redesign of enzyme activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(10):3764–3769
Frey KM, Georgiev I, Donald BR, Anderson AC (2010) Predicting resistance mutations using protein design algorithms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(31):13707–13712
Zhou Y, Xu W, Donald BR, Zeng J (2014) An efficient parallel algorithm for accelerating computational protein design. Bioinformatics 30(12):i255–i263
Hallen MA, Keedy DA, Donald BR (2013) Dead-end elimination with perturbations (DEEPer): a provable protein design algorithm with continuous sidechain and backbone flexibility. Proteins 81(1):18–39
Lilien RH, Stevens BW, Anderson AC, Donald BR (2005) A novel ensemble-based scoring and search algorithm for protein redesign and its application to modify the substrate specificity of the gramicidin synthetase a phenylalanine adenylation enzyme. J Comput Biol 12(6):740–761
Leach AR (2001) Molecular modelling: principles and applications. Pearson Education, New York
Shields GC, Seybold PG (2013) Computational approaches for the prediction of pKa values. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Pardo I, Santiago G, Gentili P, Lucas F, Monza E, Medrano F, Galli C, Martínez A, Guallar V, Camarero S (2016) Re-designing the substrate binding pocket of laccase for enhanced oxidation of sinapic acid. Catal Sci Technol ASAP 6:3900
Young T, Abel R, Kim B, Berne BJ, Friesner RA (2007) Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein–ligand binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(3):808–813
Kiss G, Çelebi-Ölçüm N, Moretti R, Baker D, Houk KN (2013) Computational enzyme design. Angew Chem Int Ed 52(22):5700–5725
Doerr S, De Fabritiis G (2014) On-the-fly learning and sampling of ligand binding by high-throughput molecular simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 10(5):2064–2069
Wijma HJ, Floor RJ, Bjelic S, Marrink SJ, Baker D, Janssen DB (2015) Enantioselective enzymes by computational design and in silico screening. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54(12):3726–3730
Jiménez-Osés G, Osuna S, Gao X, Sawaya MR, Gilson L, Collier SJ, Huisman GW, Yeates TO, Tang Y, Houk KN (2014) The role of distant mutations and allosteric regulation on LovD active site dynamics. Nat Chem Biol 10(6):431–436
Osuna S, Jiménez-Osés G, Noey EL, Houk KN (2015) Molecular dynamics explorations of active site structure in designed and evolved enzymes. Acc Chem Res 48(4):1080–1089
DuBay KH, Bowman GR, Geissler PL (2015) Fluctuations within folded proteins: implications for thermodynamic and allosteric regulation. Acc Chem Res 48(4):1098–1105
Sethi A, Eargle J, Black AA, Luthey-Schulten Z (2009) Dynamical networks in tRNA:protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(16):6620–6625
Madadkar-Sobhani A, Guallar V (2013) PELE web server: atomistic study of biomolecular systems at your fingertips. Nucleic Acids Res 41(Web Server issue):W322–W328
Lucas MF, Guallar V (2012) An atomistic view on human hemoglobin carbon monoxide migration processes. Biophys J 102(4):887–896
Takahashi R, Gil VA, Guallar V (2014) Monte Carlo free ligand diffusion with Markov state model analysis and absolute binding free energy calculations. J Chem Theory Comput 10(1):282–288
Hosseini A, Brouk M, Lucas MF, Glaser F, Fishman A, Guallar V (2015) Atomic picture of ligand migration in toluene 4-monooxygenase. J Phys Chem B 119(3):671–678
Lüdemann SK, Lounnas V, Wade RC (2000) How do substrates enter and products exit the buried active site of cytochrome P450cam? 1. Random expulsion molecular dynamics investigation of ligand access channels and mechanisms. J Mol Biol 303(5):797–811
Grubmüller H, Heymann B, Tavan P (1996) Ligand binding: molecular mechanics calculation of the streptavidin-biotin rupture force. Science 271(5251):997–999
Le Guilloux V, Schmidtke P, Tuffery P (2009) Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection. BMC Bioinforma 10(1):168
Chovancova E, Eva C, Antonin P, Petr B, Ondrej S, Jan B, Barbora K, Artur G, Vilem S, Martin K, Petr M, Lada B, Jiri S, Jiri D (2012) CAVER 3.0: a tool for the analysis of transport pathways in dynamic protein structures. PLoS Comput Biol 8(10):e1002708
Senn HM, Walter T (2009) QM/MM methods for biomolecular systems. Angew Chem Int Ed 48(7):1198–1229
Chaskar P, Prasad C, Vincent Z, Röhrig UF (2014) Toward on-the-fly quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) docking: development and benchmark of a scoring function. J Chem Inf Model 54(11):3137–3152
Cho AE, Victor G, Berne BJ, Richard F (2005) Importance of accurate charges in molecular docking: quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach. J Comput Chem 26(9):915–931
Fedorov DG, Nagata T, Kitaura K (2012) Exploring chemistry with the fragment molecular orbital method. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14(21):7562–7577
Jensen JH, Willemoës M, Winther JR, De Vico L (2014) In silico prediction of mutant HIV-1 proteases cleaving a target sequence. PLoS ONE 9(5):e95833
Grisewood MJ, Gifford NP, Pantazes RJ, Li Y, Cirino PC, Janik MJ, Maranas CD (2013) OptZyme: computational enzyme redesign using transition state analogues. PLoS ONE 8(10):e75358
Atkins PW (1998) Physical chemistry. W H Freeman & Company, New York
Khersonsky O, Rothlisberge D, Wollacott AM, Dym O, Baker D, Tawfik DS (2011) Optimization of the in silico designed Kemp eliminase KE70 by computational design and directed evolution. J Mol Biol 407(3):391–412
Genheden S, Samuel G, Ulf R (2015) The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opin Drug Discov 10(5):449–461
van der Kamp MW, Mulholland AJ (2013) Combined quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods in computational enzymology. Biochemistry 52(16):2708–2728
Zheng F, Fang Z, Wenchao Y, Mei-Chuan K, Junjun L, Hoon C, Daquan G, Min T, Hsin-Hsiung T, Woods JH, Chang-Guo Z (2008) Most efficient cocaine hydrolase designed by virtual screening of transition states. J Am Chem Soc 130(36):12148–12155
Kamerlin SCL, Arieh W (2011) The empirical valence bond model: theory and applications. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 1(1):30–45
Frushicheva MP, Cao J, Chu ZT, Warshel A (2010) Exploring challenges in rational enzyme design by simulating the catalysis in artificial kemp eliminase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(39):16869–16874
Frushicheva MP, Cao J, Warshel A (2011) Challenges and advances in validating enzyme design proposals: the case of kemp eliminase catalysis. Biochemistry 50(18):3849–3858
Amrein BA, Ireneusz Szeler F, Purg M, Kulkarni Y, Kamerlin SCL (2017) CADEE: Computer-aided directed evolution of enzymes. IUCrJ 4:50–64.
Hediger MR, De Vico L, Svendsen A, Besenmatter W, Jensen JH (2012) A computational methodology to screen activities of enzyme variants. PLoS ONE 7(12):e49849
Hediger MR, Casper S, De Vico L, Jensen JH (2013) A computational method for the systematic screening of reaction barriers in enzymes: searching for Bacillus circulans xylanase mutants with greater activity towards a synthetic substrate. PeerJ 1:e111
Hediger MR, De Vico L, Rannes JB, Christian J, Werner B, Allan S, Jensen JH (2013) In silico screening of 393 mutants facilitates enzyme engineering of amidase activity in CalB. PeerJ 1:e145
Ito M, Mika I, Tore B (2014) Novel approach for identifying key residues in enzymatic reactions: proton abstraction in ketosteroid isomerase. J Phys Chem B 118(46):13050–13058
Steinmann C, Fedorov DG, Jensen JH (2012) The effective fragment molecular orbital method for fragments connected by covalent bonds. PLoS ONE 7(7):e41117
Steinmann C, Casper S, Fedorov DG, Jensen JH (2013) Mapping enzymatic catalysis using the effective fragment molecular orbital method: towards all ab initio biochemistry. PLoS ONE 8(4):e60602
Marcus RA (1993) Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory and experiment. Rev Mod Phys 65(3):599–610
Blumberger J, Jochen B (2008) Free energies for biological electron transfer from QM/MM calculation: method, application and critical assessment. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10(37):5651
Wallrapp FH, Voityuk AA, Guallar V (2013) In-silico assessment of protein-protein electron transfer. A case study: cytochrome c peroxidase–cytochrome c. PLoS Comput Biol 9(3):e1002990
Monza E, Lucas MF, Camarero S, Alejaldre LC, Martínez AT, Guallar V (2015) Insights into laccase engineering from molecular simulations: toward a binding-focused strategy. J Phys Chem Lett 6(8):1447–1453
Gerard S, Felipe de S, Fátima Lucas M, Emanuele M, Sandra A, Ángel TM, Susana Camarero, VG (2016) Computer-aided laccase engineering: toward biological oxidation of arylamines. ACS Catalysis, 6:5415–5423
Acebes S, Fernandez-Fueyo E, Monza E, Lucas M, Almendral D, Ruiz-Dueñas FJ, Lund H, Martinez AT, Guallar V (2016) Rational enzyme engineering through biophysical and biochemical modeling. ACS Catal ACS Catalysis 6(3):1624–1629
Guallar V, Wallrapp F (2008) Mapping protein electron transfer pathways with QM/MM methods. J R Soc Interface 5(0):S233
Vidal-Limón A, Águila S, Ayala M, Batista CV, Vazquez-Duhalt R (2013) Peroxidase activity stabilization of cytochrome P450 BM3 by rational analysis of intramolecular electron transfer. J Inorg Biochem 122:18–26
Fox RJ, Huisman GW (2008) Enzyme optimization: moving from blind evolution to statistical exploration of sequence–function space. Trends Biotechnol 26(3):132–138
Feng X, Sanchis J, Reetz MT, Rabitz H (2012) Enhancing the efficiency of directed evolution in focused enzyme libraries by the adaptive substituent reordering algorithm. Chem Eur J 18(18):5646–5654
Cui Q, Elstner M (2014) Density functional tight binding: values of semi-empirical methods in an ab initio era. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16(28):14368–14377
Christensen AS, Elstner M, Cui Q (2015) Improving intermolecular interactions in DFTB3 using extended polarization from chemical-potential equalization. J Chem Phys 143(8):084123
Yilmazer ND, Korth M (2015) Enhanced semiempirical QM methods for biomolecular interactions. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 13:169–175
Privett HK, Kiss G, Lee TM, Blomberg R, Chica RA, Thomas LM, Hilvert D, Houk KN, Mayo SL (2012) Iterative approach to computational enzyme design. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(10):3790–3795
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monza, E., Acebes, S., Lucas, M.F., Guallar, V. (2017). Molecular Modeling in Enzyme Design, Toward In Silico Guided Directed Evolution. In: Alcalde, M. (eds) Directed Enzyme Evolution: Advances and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50413-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50413-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50411-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50413-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)