Skip to main content

The China Paradox of Migrant Labor Shortage Amidst Surplus Rural Laborers: An Alternative View

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Growth and Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 122))

Abstract

Historical-structural perspectives dominate the current conversation on the China paradox of the simultaneous existence of a migrant labor shortage and surplus rural laborers. This article aims to add an alternative view that looks at the efforts of individuals and households to overcome structural development constraints through their choices to remain in rural areas, out-migrate, or settle down in destination cities. Contextualized in China’s unique interregional rural-to-urban migration, the empirical inquiries are motivated by two theoretical arguments: the household livelihood diversification, and the life course perspective. Using national-level household survey data, this research adopts ordinal logistic regression models to test how the age cohorts of laborers affect the reasons why individuals choose either to remain in major rural migrant-sending areas, to out-migrate as a circular migrant worker, or to settle in major migrant-receiving areas. The preliminary findings explain the lower relative average age of migrant workers as being significantly influenced by older migrants’ greater emphasis on household and place-based assets, rather than simply being a result of risk-sharing income-generating behaviors among family members. Further, the research argues that the role of local off-farm work in migrant-sending areas and housing conditions in migrant-receiving areas are curtailing further rural-urban migration, regardless of age. This finding is important for policy-makers who wish to attract more rural laborers to urban areas or to turn temporary migration into permanent settlement as proposed by China’s New-type Urbanization Program.

Dr. Chen’s main research interest focuses on urbanization and migration, urban economics, coordinated urban-rural development and quantitative spatial analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Migrant workers are excluded from the social amenities in almost every aspect of urban life, including medicare, housing, endowment insurance, child-rearing amenities, etc.

  2. 2.

    Specifically, out-migration flows originate from the Hunan, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Chongqing and Sichuan provinces, most of which are located in Central China or its adjacent areas characterized by large populations and lagging economic development. In-migration flows terminate in the Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin Guangdong, Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces. Located along the eastern coast of China, these provinces are in the most developed region of the country and rely heavily upon a foreign-direct investment (FDI) model.

  3. 3.

    CHIPS data in 2009 is coded as CHIP2008 or RUMiC2009. CHIPS has five rounds of national level survey data administered in 1988, 1995, 2003, 2008 and 2009. They’re conducted by Beijing Normal University, National Bureau of Statistic of PRC, etc.

  4. 4.

    These provinces are: Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Hubei, Sichuan, Guangdong, Henan, Anhui and Sichuan.

  5. 5.

    CLDS2012 sample data is conducted by Center for Social Survey at Sun Yat-sen University.

References

  • Cai, Fang. 2010. “Demographic Transition, Demographic Dividend, and Lewis Turning Point in China .” Economic Research Journal 4: 4-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Kam Wing. 2010. “A china paradox: Migrant labor shortage amidst rural labor supply abundance.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 51(4): 513-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Kam Wing. 2014. “China’s urbanization 2020: a new blueprint and direction.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 55(1): 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Feiyan., and Korinek, Kim. 2010. “Family life course transitions and rural household economy during China’s market reform.” Demography 47(4): 963-987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Junhua., Guo, Fei., and Wu, Ying. 2011. “One decade of urban housing reform in China: urban housing price dynamics and the role of migration and urbanization, 1995–2005.” Habitat International 35(1): 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Committee of CPC and State Council of the PRC (CCCPC and SCPRC). 2014. “Guojia xinxing chengzhenhua guihua (2014-2020)”. (“National New-type Urbanization Plan :2014-2020”). Accessed 05 October 2014. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2014-03/16/content_2640075.htm.

  • De Haas, Hein. 2010. “Migration and development: a theoretical perspective1.” International Migration Review 44(1): 227-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Démurger, Sylvie, and Li, Shi. 2013. “Migration, remittances, and rural employment patterns: evidence from China.” Research in Labor Economics 37: 31-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Frank. 1998. “Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification.” The journal of development studies 35(1): 1-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Frank. 1993 [1988]. Peasant economics: Farm households in agrarian development. Vol. 23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C. Cindy. 2005. “Interprovincial migration, population redistribution, and regional development in china: 1990 and 2000 census comparisons.” Professional Geographer 57(2): 295-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C. Cindy. 2011. “Settlement intention and split households: Findings from a survey of migrants in Beijing’s urban villages.” China Review 11-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley, Jane, and Meng, Xin. 2011. “Has China run out of surplus labor?” China Economic Review 22(4): 555-572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, John., Deng Quheng., and Li, Shi. 2011. “The puzzle of migrant labor shortage and rural labor surplus in china.” China Economic Review 22(4): 585-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, Fung. 2009. “Agricultural Labor and the Incidence of Surplus Labor: Experience from China during Reform.” Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 7 (3): 341 – 361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kley, Stefanie. 2011. “Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework.” European Sociological Review 27(4): 469-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Huaiyu., Cao, Shinan., and Deng, Jing. 2013. “Coexistence of surplus labor and the Lewis turning point in China: a unitary household decision-making model study.” Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 8(2): 249-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Daniel J. 1986. “A conception of adult development.” American psychologist 41(1): 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. Arthur. 1954. “Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor.” The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 22(2): 139–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Shaoquan, Xie, Fangting., Zhang, Haiqin., and Guo, Shili. 2014. “Influences on rural migrant workers’ selection of employment location in the mountainous and upland areas of Sichuan, China.” Journal of Rural Studies 33: 71-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Zhilin, and Wang, Yujun. 2014. “ 6 Housing access, sense of attachment, and settlement intention of rural migrants in Chinese cities.” In Housing Inequality in Chinese Cities, edited by Huang, Youqin, and Si-ming Li . Vol. 115. Routledge, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minami, Ryoshin, and Ma, Xinxin. 2010. “The Lewis turning point of Chinese economy: Comparison with Japanese experience.” China Economic Journal 3(2): 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Oded., and Bloom, David. E. 1985. “The new economics of labor migration.” The American Economic Review 173-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro, Michael. P. 1969. “A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries.” American Economic Review 59(1): 138-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Xiaobing., Huang, Jikun., Zhang, Linxiu., and Rozelle, Scott. 2011. “The rise of migration and the fall of self employment in rural China’s labor market.” China Economic Review 22(4): 573-584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Zicheng., and Yang, Weiguo. 2013. “Self-employment or wage-employment: on the occupational choice of return migration in rural China.” China Agricultural Economic Review 5(2): 231-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Wenfei Winnie, and Fan, C. Cindy. 2006. “Success or failure: selectivity and reasons of return migration in Sichuan and Anhui, China.” California Center for Population Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Xiushi. 2000. “Determinants of migration intentions in Hubei province, China: individual versus family migration.” Environment and Planning A 32(5): 769-788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Xiaohuan., Bauer, Siegfried., & Huo, Xuexi. (2014). “Farm Size, Land Reallocation, and Labour Migration in Rural China.” Population, Space and Place 20(4): 303-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue, Zhongshan., Li, Shuzhuo., Feldman, Marcus W., and Du, Haifeng. 2010. “Floating choices: A generational perspective on intentions of rural-urban migrants in China.” Environment and planning A 42(3): 545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Yumin., and LeGates, Richard. 2013. Coordinating Urban and Rural Development in China: Learning from Chengdu. London: Eward Elgar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Min., and Chen, Chen. 2013. “Current Situation, Theoretical Interpretation and Reflections on Policy Agendas of Urbanization in Chian.” City Planning Review (12): 9-21

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Yu. 2007. “China’s floating population and their settlement intention in the cities: Beyond the hukou reform.” Habitat International 31(1): 65-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Yu., and Chen, Wenzhe. 2010. “The settlement intention of China’s floating population in the cities: Recent changes and multifaceted individual-level determinants.” Population Space and Place 16(4): 253-267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Chinese Scholarship Council under Grant <No. 201206260001> and Tongji Architectural Design (TJAD). I would like to thank Professor Min Zhao (Tongji University), Theodore C. Lim (University of Pennsylvania), and Professor Bo Qin (Ren Min University) and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an early draft of this article. Any remaining error is the responsibility of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, C. (2017). The China Paradox of Migrant Labor Shortage Amidst Surplus Rural Laborers: An Alternative View. In: Pan, Q., Li, W. (eds) Smart Growth and Sustainable Development. GeoJournal Library, vol 122. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48296-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48296-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48295-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48296-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics