Skip to main content

A Comparison of E-Assessment Assignment Submission Processes in Introductory Computing Courses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICT Education (SACLA 2016)

Abstract

Students completing university education programs are generally required to complete an Introductory Computing Course (ICC) in their first year of study. Introductory Computing, also referred to as Computer Fundamentals or End User Computing, are theoretical and practical in nature. Due to the large number of students completing the ICCs, institutions are introducing and increasingly utilising e-learning systems and e-assessment systems. Research generally focuses on e-assessment from an educator or instructor’s perspective. In this study, the students’ perceptions of e-assessment were evaluated, exploring different options with regards to the submission and assessment of MS-Office documents as part of the ICC. The study identified the best method of submission from a students’ perspective considering various factors and comparing three different submission methods. The results highlighted suggestions for improving the on-line submission system. The results could assist educators and instructors utilising e-assessment systems in improving the submission and marking processes, in any course where files are required for submission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brooke, J.: SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. In: Jordan, P., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B., McClelland, A. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8(2), 29–40 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Learning, C.: SAM: Skills Assessment Manager (2016). http://www.cengage.com/sam/

  4. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education. Routledge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dermo, J.: E-assement and the student learning experience: a survey of student perceptions of e-assessment. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 40(2), 203–214 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kay, D.G.: Large introductory computer science classes: strategies for effective course management. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 30(1), 131–134 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kovačić, Z.J., Green, J.S.: Automatic grading of spreadsheet and database skills. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 11, 53–70 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy, M., Sharma, A., Rosso, M.: Measuring assurance of learning goals: effectiveness of computer training and assessment tools. Inf. Syst. Educ. J. 10(5), 87–94 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murray, T.: Authoring knowledge based tutors: tools for content, instructional strategy, student model and interface design. J. Learn. Sci. 7(1), 5–64 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melisa Koorsse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koorsse, M., Taljaard, M., Calitz, A.P. (2016). A Comparison of E-Assessment Assignment Submission Processes in Introductory Computing Courses. In: Gruner, S. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47680-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47680-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47679-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47680-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics