Skip to main content

Abstract

Anticompetitive unilateral conduct is prohibited by Article 9 of the Act of Competition and Consumer Protection (hereinafter the “Act”). According to Article 9(1) of the Act, the abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within a relevant market shall be prohibited. This legislation constitutes a development of the general rule laid down in Article 1(2) of the Act, whereby the Act regulates the principles and procedures for counteracting practices that restrict competition (restrictive practices). The prohibition of the abuse of a dominant position is a unilateral practice in the form of acts or omissions of an undertaking with a significant degree of market power. The structure of this regulation is based on the provisions of Article 102 TFEU. In addition, Polish competition law considers the abuse of a dominant position as contrary to general public interest. The prohibition laid down in Article 9(1) is absolute, which means that the law does not provide any means of exemption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A. Stawicki, E. Stawicki (eds.). Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz. Warsaw 2011.

  2. 2.

    C. Banasiński, Ochrona konkurencji i konsumentów w Polsce i Unii Europejskiej (studia prawno-ekonomiczne). Warszawa 2005.

  3. 3.

    Ibidem.

  4. 4.

    D. Miąsik, Rozwój polskiego prawa konkurencji, SPP 2013, Nr 1.

  5. 5.

    Regulation 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation), OJ 2004 364, p. 1.

  6. 6.

    A. Stawicki, E. Stawicki (eds.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz. Warsaw 2011, p. 303.

  7. 7.

    Ibidem, p. 303.

  8. 8.

    Ibidem; T. Skoczny (ed.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz. Warsaw 2014, p. 434.

  9. 9.

    Ibidem.

  10. 10.

    Ibidem, p. 428.

  11. 11.

    A. Stawicki, E. Stawicki (eds.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz. Warsaw 2011, p. 305.

  12. 12.

    PCA Decision No. DOK-3/2009 of 7 July 2009.

  13. 13.

    T. Skoczny (ed.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz. Warsaw 2014, p. 433.

  14. 14.

    Ibidem, p. 436; A. Stawicki, E. Stawicki (eds.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz. Warsaw 2011, p. 323.

  15. 15.

    PCA’s Decision No. RPZ-32/2007 of 12 September 2008.

  16. 16.

    A. Stawicki, E. Stawicki (eds.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz. Warsaw 2011, p. 324.

  17. 17.

    Ibidem, p. 349.

  18. 18.

    Ruling of the Antimonopoly Court (predecessor of the Competition Court) of 19 November 2001, Ref. No. XVII Ama 2/01.

  19. 19.

    Ruling of the Competition Court of 21 May 2010, Ref. No. XVII AmA 71/09.

  20. 20.

    M. Blachucki, Polish Competition Law – Commentary, Case Law And Texts. Warsaw 2013, p. 39.

  21. 21.

    PCA’s Decision No. RKT-39/2014 of 27 November 2014.

  22. 22.

    PCA’s Decision No. DOK-8/2013 of 31 December 2013.

  23. 23.

    ECJ, case 85/76, Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. AG v Commission, ECR 1979, 461.

  24. 24.

    ECJ, case 322/81, Nederlandsche Banden-Industrie Michelin N.V. v. Commission, ECR 1983, 3461.

  25. 25.

    A. Stawicki, E. Stawicki (eds.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz. Warsaw 2011.

  26. 26.

    Ibidem.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksander Stawicki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stawicki, A., Turno, B., Feliszewski, T. (2017). Poland. In: Këllezi, P., Kilpatrick, B., Kobel, P. (eds) Abuse of Dominant Position and Globalization & Protection and Disclosure of Trade Secrets and Know-How. LIDC Contributions on Antitrust Law, Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46891-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46891-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46890-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46891-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics