Skip to main content

Reciprocal Cycles in International Politics: Summary and Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cooperation and Protracted Conflict in International Affairs
  • 212 Accesses

Abstract

Using the framework utilizing the variables of power symmetry, issue saliency, images, and domain of operation, some policy relevant observations are examined including conditions required for shifting the interaction from a negative to a positive cycle and vice versa. The framework analyzing conditions for the development of positive and negative reciprocal cycles is then used to evaluate present-day cases. Applying the framework to the contemporary case of US-China relations over the South China Sea (SCS) illustrates how difficult this case really is in more levels than usually presented. Then an analysis of US-Iran relations after the Iran nuclear deal suggests possibilities for nudging interactions into a positive reciprocal cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. 1985. Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics 38(1): 226–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, Kevin, and Brian Melchior. 2014. China: Maritime Claims in the South China Sea. Report and Analysis Made for Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, U.S. Department of State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, Hannah, Mark Thompson, and Yang Siqi. 2016. Inside the International Contest over the Most Important Waterway in the World. Time, June 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charbonneau, Louis. 2016. Iran Missile Tests Were “in Defiance” of UN Resolution. Reuters, March 30, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Andrew S. 2015. America’s Security Role in the South China Sea. Testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific, 23 July 2015. Published in the Naval War College Review, January 1, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geranmayeh, Ellie. 2016. Rouhani’s Greatest Win on the Verge of Becoming Liability. Al-Monitor, May 19, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Lyle. 2015. Rocks, Reefs, and U.S.-China Relations. Brown Journal of World Affairs 22(1): 271–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, Peng Er. 2016. China, the United States, Alliances, and War: Avoiding the Thucydides Trap?. Asian Affairs: An American Review 43(2): 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohesni, Ebrahim, Nancy Gallagher, and Clay Ramsay. 2015. Iranian Public Opinion on the Nuclear Negotiations. College Park, MD: Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Nalanda. 2015. Dragon-Elephant Relationship in the South China Sea Imbroglio. Journal of Third World Studies 32(1): 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • The JCPOA Timeline. Center for Strategic International Studies, jcpoatimeline.csis.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niv-Solomon, A. (2017). Reciprocal Cycles in International Politics: Summary and Conclusions. In: Cooperation and Protracted Conflict in International Affairs . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45805-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics