Skip to main content

Equal Friends or Equal Enemies: Power Asymmetry and the Impact on Reciprocal Cycles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cooperation and Protracted Conflict in International Affairs
  • 209 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews and analyzes the roots and buildup to the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese war and examines how the accumulation of tensions and then the war resulted in a long-lasting negative reciprocal cycle between the two countries. The case accounts for the operation and importance of all four variables, yet highlights the importance of power symmetry. Power symmetry is always an important element in any study of international crises or conflict management, and it is also important for understanding the impact of the other variables such as images and domain of operation on the direction of the evolving reciprocal cycle. The case reviewed here is an illustration of how power asymmetry coupled with negative images and a bigger appetite for risk-taking operate as an obstacle for the development of a positive tit-For-tat (TFT) reciprocal cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lebow (2007) writes on the merits of counterfactual analysis in social science arguing that whenever we assume that X causes Y, we also assume that Y would not have existed without X. In addition, Lebow (2007, p. 155) shows how “similar causal mechanisms can have different consequences when they operate in different contexts.”

References

  • Addis, Sir John. 1986. Indochina: An Arena of Conflict. In The Balance of Power in East Asia, ed. Michael Liefer. New York: St: Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanda, Nayan. 1986. Brother Enemy: The War After the War. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Pao-min. 1986. The Sino-Vietnamese Territorial Dispute. The Washington Papers 118. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. C. 1987. China’s War with Vietnam: Issues, Decisions, and Implications. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Thomas. 2006. Windows and War: Trend Analysis and Beijing’s Use of Force. In Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert S. Ross ed. New Directions in the Study of China’s Foreign Policy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 50–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duiker, W. J. 1986. China and Vietnam: The Roots of a Conflict. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garver, John. 1992. China and South Asia. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 519: 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, Ang Cheng. 2000. The South China Sea Dispute Revisited. Australian Journal of International Affairs 54(2): 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herod, Bill, and Peggy Herod. 1979. The Sino-Vietnamese Conflict and U.S. Policy. Washington, DC: Church World Service Office on Indochina Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, Richard K., and Michael P. Fischerkeller 1995. Beyond the Enemy Image and Spiral Model: Cognitive-Strategic Research after the Cold War. International Organization 49(3): 415–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Steven J. 1992. Dragons Entangled. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc. East Gate Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Eugene K. 1984. The Sino-Vietnamese Conflict. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard Ned. 2007. Counterfactual Thought Experiments: A Necessary Research Tool. The History Teacher 40(2): 153–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, Michael. 1980. Conflict and Regional Order in South-East Asia. Adelphi Papers # 162, The International Institute for Strategic Studies (U162 A3 #162) PP 13–15; 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Robert S. 1988. The Indochina Tangle: China’s Vietnam Policy 1975–1979. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, Brantly. 2006. China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Pike Collection (DPC). Vietnam Center Virtual Archive Located at and Maintained by Texas Tech University. http://www.vietnam.ttu.edu/virtualarchive/.

  • Douglas Pike Collection: Unit 11—Monographs, The Vietnam Archive, Texas Tech University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facts About Policy Against Viet Nam of the Authority of the People’s Republic of China, No Date, Folder 17, Box 07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Pike Collection: Unit 03—Insurgency Warfare, The Vietnam Archive, Texas Tech University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Article: “China’s New Model for ‘People’s War’ Strategy” from South-East Asian SPECTRUM, July–September 1976, Folder 05, Box 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Pike Collection: Unit 06—Democratic Republic of Vietnam, The Vietnam Archive, Texas Tech University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebuilding shattered Vietnam, Repairing a Rural Base, The Slow Road to Socialism, 13 February 1976, Folder 07, Box 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Fruits of Victory, 1976, Folder 07, Box 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New Vietnam: Hanoi’s Revolutionary Strategy, November 1977, Folder 02, Box 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vietnam, North—Facts and Figures, January 1, 1976, Folder 08, Box 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vietnam: One Year Later, April 30, 1976, Folder 07, Box 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • VN—China Chron—1977, January 1, 1977, Folder 01, Box 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vietnamese Communist Party Central Committee Resolution 5, as Studied by Village-Level Party Members in Mid −1978, January 1, 1978, Folder 04, Box 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Pike Collection: Additional:

    Google Scholar 

  • “Battle reports’ on Sino-Vietnamese War Developments Passed Orally to Guangzhou Cadres.” DRV/CH 2/16/1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Vietnam-China Border War.” SRV/CH February 1979; SRV/CHINA 2/17/79; SRV/CHINA 2/26/79.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Beginning of Sino Vietnamese Border War.” Vietnam/FR/CH February 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • “China-Vietnam: Factors Affecting Beijing’s Decision to Invade Vietnam.” SRV/CH 02/25/1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Special SRV-China study” SRV/FR/CH July 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • “‘All we want is a peaceful border’—A Statement Issued by the PRC on March, 5 1979.” DRV/FR/CH 2/79.

    Google Scholar 

  • “China Acted in Self-Defense.” DRV/FR/CH 2/79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung His-tung. “Chinese Government Delegation Leader’s Statement at 8th Session of Sino-Vietnamese Negotiations, 5 October 1978 SRV/FR/CH.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Topic #7: Vietnam and Its Neighbors: Big Powers and Little Wars.” July 1979 Vietnam/SIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Communist Rivalry in Indochina.” August 1979 SRV/SIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Facts About Policy Against Viet Nam of the Authority of the People’s Republic of China.” 1979 SRV/FR.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Foreign Ministry Holds Press Conference 21 February.” February 1979 SRV/CHINA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieutenant Commander Jerry J. Fletcher to Chief of Naval Operations, Navy Department, Washington DC, “Trip Report on Visit to the People’s Republic of China (PRC)” September 1, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, Douglas. “Soviet Response to an Intra-Communist Crisis: Indochina, 1979.” Paper prepared for 18th Annual Conference on Slavic Studies, 10/1979 SRV/SIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Speech by Vietnam Communist Party Central Committee Member Hoang Tung on Plans before Chinese Invasion.” February 14–15, 1979 SRV/Bio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speech by Vietnam Communist Party Central Committee Member Hoang Tung on the Kampuchean Revolution and Chinese Threat.” February 14–15, 1979 SRV/SIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Views and Comments on Recent Sino-Vietnamese Conflict from Residents in China.” Mid-to-Late February 1979 SRV/CHINA.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Vietnam: General Situation—11/78” November 1978 SRV/SIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Chinese Aggression: Why and How It Failed.” SRV—foreign relations, Hanoi 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Hanoi Keys Foreign, Domestic Policy to Checking China Threat.” June 1979 DRV/SIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Report on Early Days of VN_China Border War: 2/79.” February 18, 1979 SRV/FR/CH.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Media Report on PRC Border Provocations of 10–15 February.” February 1979 DRV/FR/CH.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Nhan Dam Editorial Urges Defeat of PRC Aggression.” February 22, 1979 DRV/CH.

    Google Scholar 

  • “PRC Aggressors Will be Punished for Their Bloody Crimes.” February 25, 1979 DRV/CH.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Report on Incident.” February 14, 1979 DRV/FR/CH.

    Google Scholar 

  • “SRV Situation: 12/78” December 1978 SRV/SIT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niv-Solomon, A. (2017). Equal Friends or Equal Enemies: Power Asymmetry and the Impact on Reciprocal Cycles. In: Cooperation and Protracted Conflict in International Affairs . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45805-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics