Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating IT Standardization Process Through the Lens of Theory of Communicative Action

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life (WEB 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 258))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1175 Accesses

Abstract

Developing standards is a social practice wherein experts engage in discussions to evaluate design solutions. In this paper, we analyze processes followed to develop SOAP standard from the theory of communicative action perspective, which argues that individuals engaged in social discourse would exhibit five possible actions: instrumental, strategic, normatively regulated, dramaturgical, and communicative. Our findings reveal that participants in standardization processes engage in communicative action most frequently with aim of reaching mutual understanding and consensus, engage in strategic action when influencing others towards their intended goals, engage in instrumental action when taking responsibility for solving technical issues, engage in dramaturgical action when expressing their opinions, and engage in normatively regulated action when performing roles they assumed. Our analysis indicates that 60 % of activities performed are consensus oriented whereas the rest are success oriented. This paper provides empirical evidence for Habermasian view of social actions occurring in the standardization process setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sherif, M.H.: A framework for standardization in telecommunications and information technology. IEEE Commun. Mag. 39, 94–100 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W3C-Process: W3C. http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/

  3. Schoechle, T.: Toward a theory of standards. In: IEEE Conference on Standardisation and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT), Los Alamitos, CA, USA. IEEE (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lyytinen, K., Hirschheim, R.: Information systems as rational discourse: an application of Habermas’s theory of communicative action. Scand. J. Manag. 4, 19–30 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Froomkin, A.M.: Habermas@discourse.net: toward a critical theory of cyberspace. Harv. Law Rev. 116, 751–873 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Umapathy, K.: An investigation of W3C standardization processes using rational discourse. In: AIS Special Interest Group on Pragmatist IS Research (SIGPrag) Meeting (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Habermas, J.: The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press, Boston (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lehr, W.: Standardization: understanding the process. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 43, 550–555 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao, K., et al.: Vertical e-Business standards and standards developing organizations: a conceptual framework. Electron. Mark. 15, 289–300 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi, B., et al.: Process model for e-Business standards development: a case of ebXML standards. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 56, 448–467 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heng, M.S.H., De Moor, A.: From Habermas’s communicative theory to practice on the internet. Inf. Syst. J. 13, 331–352 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolton, R.: The importance of Habermas’s “Communicative Action” for social capital and social network theory. In: Annual Meeting of Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ngwenyama, O.K., Lee, A.S.: Communication richness in electronic mail: critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Q. 21, 145–167 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen, S., et al.: Wikipedia as rational discourse: an illustration of the emancipatory potential of information systems. In: Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Janson, M.: Communicative action theory: an approach to understanding the application of information systems. In: Australasian Conference on Information Systems (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Klein, H.K., Huynh, M.Q.: The Critical social theory of Jürgen Habermas and its implications for IS research. In: Mingers, J., Willcocks, L. (eds.) Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, pp. 157–237. Wiley, Chichester (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen, S., et al.: Wikipedia, critical social theory, and the possibility of rational discourse. Inf. Soc. 25, 38–59 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manninen, T.: Interaction forms and communicative actions in multiplayer games. Int. J. Comput. Game Res. 3, 5–10 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. W3C-XMLWG: W3C. http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/

  21. SOAP: W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/

  22. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stemler, S.: An overview of content analysis. Res. Eval. 7, 137–146 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ATLAS.ti: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rourke, L., et al.: Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. IJAIED 12, 8–22 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Neuendorf, K.A.: The Content Analysis Guidebook. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lombard, M., et al.: Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum. Commun. Res. 28, 587–604 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of North Florida, 1 UNF Drive, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA

    Karthikeyan Umapathy

  2. Bentley University, 175 Forest Street, Waltham, MA, 02452, USA

    Sandeep Purao

  3. Penn State University, IST Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    John W. Bagby

Authors
  1. Karthikeyan Umapathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandeep Purao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John W. Bagby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karthikeyan Umapathy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Decision and Information Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA

    Vijayan Sugumaran

  2. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA

    Victoria Yoon

  3. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA

    Michael J. Shaw

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Umapathy, K., Purao, S., Bagby, J.W. (2016). Investigating IT Standardization Process Through the Lens of Theory of Communicative Action. In: Sugumaran, V., Yoon, V., Shaw, M. (eds) E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life. WEB 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 258. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45408-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation