Skip to main content

Do Hedonic and Utilitarian Apps Differ in Consumer Appeal?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life (WEB 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 258))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This research in progress suggests that hedonic and utilitarian mobile applications (apps) differ in consumer appeal. We operationalize consumer appeal through addiction, frustration and consumer value perception. The interplay of frustration in the presence of a set of addicted customers is interesting, as many apps may have an addicted consumer baser-specifically for games, communications of or entertainment apps. Consumer frustration may act as a negative complementing factor to consumer addiction, and this substitution effect is argued to be higher for hedonic products than utilitarian products. Hypotheses are drawn and a methodology is suggested. Possible implications and contributions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bessière, K., Newhagen, J.E., Robinson, J.P., Shneiderman, B.: A model for computer frustration: the role of instrumental and dispositional factors on incident, session, and post-session frustration and mood. Comput. Hum. Behav. 22(6), 941–961 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guchait, P., Namasivayam, K.: Customer creation of service products: role of frustration in customer evaluations. J. Serv. Market. 26(3), 216–224 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hazarika, B., Karimi, J., Khuntia, J., Parthasarathy, M.: Consumer Frustration and Consumer Valuation Shift for Mobile Apps: An Exploratory Study (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holden, C.: ‘Behavioral’ addictions: do they exist? Science 294(5544), 980–982 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. IDC.: Worldwide and U.S. Mobile applications download and revenue 2013–2017 forecast: The app as the emerging face of the internet (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lazar, J., Jones, A., Hackley, M., Shneiderman, B.: Severity and impact of computer user frustration: a comparison of student and workplace users. Interact. Comput. 18(2), 187–207 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenhart, A.: The Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A New Look At Access and the Digital Divide. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, D.C. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, C.P., Bhattacherjee, A.: Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and empirical test. Inf. Syst. J. 20(2), 163–181 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mallat, N.: Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments–a qualitative study. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 16(4), 413–432 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Turel, O., Serenko, A., Bontis, N.: User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: a theory of consumption values perspective. Inf. Manag. 47(1), 53–59 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wakefield, R.L., Whitten, D.: Mobile computing: a user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(3), 292–300 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilfong, J.D.: Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Comput. Hum. Behav. 22(6), 1001–1011 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wakefield, R.L., Whitten, D.: Mobile computing: a user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(3), 292–300 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Young, K.S.: Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 1(3), 237–244 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bidyut Hazarika .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hazarika, B., Khuntia, J., Parthasarathy, M., Karimi, J. (2016). Do Hedonic and Utilitarian Apps Differ in Consumer Appeal?. In: Sugumaran, V., Yoon, V., Shaw, M. (eds) E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life. WEB 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 258. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45408-5_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics