Skip to main content

Reducing Information to Stimulate Design Imagination

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Computing and Cognition '16

Abstract

This paper describes an experiment that is part of a larger research project that compares the visual reasoning between groups of designers and non-designers. In particular, this experiment focuses on how designers’ processes of reasoning is characterized when they are given different levels of reduced information of an object in comparison to a group of non-designers. The experiment used deconstructed and scaled-down components of Gerrit Riedveld’s iconic Red and Blue Chair. Three groups were given 3 different levels of information—group 1 were given components painted the same color as the original chair, group 2 were given components painted in a single (white) color, and group 3 were given unpainted (natural) components. The results suggest that the 3 levels of reduced information impacted on the designers’ reasoning processes and there were clear differences in the visual reasoning processes between design and non-design participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Athavankar U (1989) Categorization… natural language and design. Des Issues 5(2):100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94(2):115–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do EY, Gross MD (1996) Drawing as a means to design reasoning. Artificial Intelligence in Design, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Galotti KM (2013) Cognitive psychology in and out of the laboratory, 5th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel V (1995) Sketches of thought. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G (1994) On visual design thinking: the vis kind of architecture. Des Stud 15(2):158–174

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G (2003) The backtalk of self-generated sketches. Des Issues 19(1):72–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G (2014) Modeling the role of sketching in design idea generation. In: Chakrabarti A, Blessing LTM (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design. Springer, London, pp 433–450

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue S, Rodgers P, Tennant A, Spencer N (2015) Reductionism as a tool for creative exploration. In: Proceedings of 11th international european academy of design conference (EAD), Paris Descartes University, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2006) The semantic turn: a new foundation for design. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes A, Lawson B (2006) How designers perceive sketches. Des Stud 27(5):571–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers PA, Green G, McGown A (2000) Using concept sketches to track design progress. Des Stud 21(5):451–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1983) Reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA, Wiggins G (1992) Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Des Stud 13(2):135–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwa M, Tversky B (2002) External representations contribute to the dynamic construction of ideas. In: Meyer B, Narayanan NH, Hegarty M (eds) Diagrammatic representation and inference. Springer, Berlin, pp 341–343

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Suwa M, Gero J, Purcell T (2000) Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process. Des Stud 21(6):539–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27(2):237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng WSW, Ball LJ (2011) How uncertainty helps sketch interpretation in a design task. In: Taura T, Nagai Y (eds) Design Creativity 2010. Springer, London, pp 257–264

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Zijl I (2010) Gerrit rietveld. Phaidon Press Inc., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware C (2008) Visual thinking for design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiro Inoue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Inoue, S., Rodgers, P.A., Tennant, A., Spencer, N. (2017). Reducing Information to Stimulate Design Imagination. In: Gero, J. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44989-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44989-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44988-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44989-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics