Skip to main content

Knowledge Creation in Temporary Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cooperative and Networking Strategies in Small Business

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

  • 1285 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter studies knowledge creation in temporary organizations (TOs) to address the relationship between TOs and their permanent environment. Knowledge creation is a process of interaction in an organizational context that must combine hierarchy/control and flexibility/autonomy elements. Based on a case study of twelve inter-organizational TOs, this chapter nuances the decoupling between TOs and their permanent environment as follows. TOs are managed independently but TO knowledge creation depends on continuous inputs from the permanent environment. TOs depend on informal hierarchy/control elements in the permanent environment. TO knowledge creation depends on both the willingness of TO members to create knowledge and the extent that the permanent environment enables them to create knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amin, A., & Cohendet, P. (2004). Architectures of knowledge: Firms, capabilities and communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, R. (2010). Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 466–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J., & Boumgarden, P. (2010). Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic teams” can be better learners. Organization Science, 21(3), 609–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G. (1961). The management of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R., Price, D., Coates, P., & Pike, R. (1998). Organizing for innovation: Loose or tight control? Long Range Planning, 31(5), 775–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T., & Teng, B. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 85–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G. (2002). Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Studies, 36(3), 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G. (2004). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1491–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1996). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(special issue), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Nickerson, J. (2008). Interorganizational trust, governance choice and exchange performance. Organization Science, 19(5), 688–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organization: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29(7), 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, J., Olson, B., & Olaisen, J. (1997). Organizing for innovation. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Keohane, R., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein Woolthuis, R., Hillebrand, B., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Trust, contract and relationship development. Organization Studies, 26(6), 813–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludin, R., & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P., Bathelt, H., & Malmberg, A. (2006). Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 997–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthusamy, S., & White, M. (2005). Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organization Studies, 26(3), 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1997). What is the optimum amount of organizational slack? A study of the relationship between slack and innovation in multinational firms. European Management Journal, 15(6), 603–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–6552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40(3), 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Principe, A., & Tell, F. (2001). Inter-project learning: Process and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30(9), 1373–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., Spencer, L., & O’Connor, W. (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlfing, I. (2012). Varieties of process tracing and ways to answer why questions. European Political Science. doi:10.1057/eps.2012.7. Advance online publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutten, R., & Oerlemans, L. (2009). Temporary inter-organisational collaboration as a driver of regional innovation: An evaluation. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(3), 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., & Waguespack, D. (2006). Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(4), 560–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (2008). How do organizations learn from project—and do they? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2), 248–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woiceshyn, J. (2000). Technology adoption: Organizational learning in oil firms. Organization Studies, 21(6), 1095–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roel Rutten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rutten, R. (2017). Knowledge Creation in Temporary Organizations. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Ferreira, J. (eds) Cooperative and Networking Strategies in Small Business. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44509-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics