Skip to main content

Stakeholder Theory in Strategic Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stakeholder Theory

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Ethics ((BRIEFSETHIC))

Abstract

Strategy consists in making choices and taking decisions involving an organization while being aware of the interactions between the corporation, its environment, and its existing or potential resources. Linked to corporate policy, it is an activity which requires reflection and action. As practice, it “gradually constructs ensembles of opportunities and imagines trajectories of development in a rapidly changing and partially unpredictable environment” (Desreumeaux et al. 2009). As reflection, it “renders the world comprehensible, simplifying it with a view to facilitating action” (Desreumeaux et al. 2009). As such, it is praxeological reflection because it seeks efficacy and efficiency (yields and the relationship between assets and results) (Martinet et al. 1990). From the outset, stakeholder theory has cast itself as a practical and useful theory associated with strategy, as is demonstrated by both the oldest and most recent publications on the subject, those of Freeman and his co-authors: Stakeholder Theory, written by Phillipps and Freeman (2010); Stakeholder Theory: A State of the Art, coordinated by Freeman et al. (2010); The Handbook of Strategic Management, edited by Hitt et al. (2001); Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984); “Manager les parties prenantes” (1982); and Manager pour les parties prenantes: survie, réputation et succès (2007). To this list can be added the recent book by Wicks, Freeman and Werhane: Business Ethics: A Managerial Approach (2009). For the advocates of the theory, the managerial or strategic management approach encompasses planning, systems theory, corporate social responsibility, and organization theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abell, Derek F. 1980. Defining the business: The starting point of strategic planning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggeri, F. 2008. Régénerer les cadres de la stratégie. Mise en dispositif et exploration de nouveaux espaces d’action stratégiques. HDR thesis defended at the University of Paris, Dauphine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. 1984. The cooperative game theory of the firm. Oxford Oxfordshire/New York: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aymard-Duvernet, F. 2004. Economie politique de l’entreprise. Paris: La Decouverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. 1989. Assets, stocks and sustained competitive advantage. Management Science 35: 1511–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D.P. 1995. Business and its environment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D.P. 2006. A positive theory of moral management: Social pressure and corporate social performance. Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 1940, Rock Center for Corporate Governance, Working Paper No. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, J.B., J.R. Dyer, W.G. Smith, and G.L. Adams. 2010. A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics 99(4): 565–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A.M., and Nalebuff, B. 1995. The right game: Using game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review (July–August), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caby, J. 2003. Valeur partenariale ou actionnariale. In Encyclopédie des ressources humaines, ed. J. Allouche and I. Huault. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charreaux, G. 1997. Le gouvernement des entreprises: Corporate Governance, Théories et Faits. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charreaux, G., and P. Wirtz. 2006. Gouvernance des entreprises, Nouvelles Perspectives. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., A. Payne, and D. Ballantyne. 1991. Relationship marketing: Bringing quality, customer service and marketing together. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colla, E. 2011. Le concept de partie prenante dans la littérature en marketing: questions de recherche. Research seminar held at the Institute of Corporate Administration (IAE) at the University of Poitiers, Center for Management Research (CEREGE) and the Center for Research in Commerce (CRC) at Advancia-Negocia, Paris Chamber of Trade and Industry School of Commerce and Entrepreneurship, Aprel 2001, Poitiers, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, B., and A.C. Shapiro. 1987. Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management 16(1): 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. 2010. The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal 31(13): 1371–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dery, J. 1996. Analyse bibliographique des écoles en stratégie. Actes de la journée Recherche en gestion. FNEGE Paris, October 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desreumaux, A. 2004. Théorie néo-institutionnelle, management stratégique et dynamique des organisations. In Institutions et gestion, ed. I. Huault. Paris: Vuibert/FNEGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desreumaux, A.A., X. Lecocq, et V. Warnier. 2005, 2006. Stratégie. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desreumaux, A., X. Lecocq, and V. Warnier. 2006. Stratégie. Paris: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H., and H. Singh. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., and W. Ury. 1981. Comment réussir une négociation. Paris: Seuil, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, E. 1984. Strategic management, a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management. A atakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 2010. Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., and W. Evan. 1990. Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics 19: 337–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., and D. Reed. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. In Corporate governance: A definitive exploration of the issues, ed. C. Huizinga. Los Angeles: UCLA Extension Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., J.S. Harrison, and A.C. Wicks. 2007. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation and success. The Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Series in Ethics and Lead, Caravan Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., J.S. Harrison, A.C. Wicks, B.L. Parma, and S. De Colle. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, G. 1991. Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review 16: 10–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A., and E. Pitre. 1990. Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review 15(4): 584–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, P.-Y., and H. Korine. 2009. L’Entreprise dans la démocratie. Une théorie politique du gouvernement des entreprises. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Université.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafsi, T., and A.C. Martinet. 2007. The strategic decision-making process in state owned enterprises. Gestion 32(3): 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J., and A. Potter. 2004. The Rebel Sell. How the counterculture became consumer culture. London: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, C.W.L., R.E. Freeman, and J.S. Harrison. 2001. The Blackwell handbook of strategic management. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, C.W., and D.E. Schendel. 1996. Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. Saint-Paul: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D.B. 2002. Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research 29: 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huault, I. 2004. Institutions et gestion. Paris: Vuibert/FNEGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarniou, J. 1981. L’entreprise comme système politique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Management behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf, E. 1973. Peace research and the industrial revolution. Journal of Peace Research 10(3): 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. 2005. According to Kotler. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, H. 2007. La querelle du contenu et du processus, les enjeux de la transformation du champ de la stratégie. AIMS Montreal (working paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, H., and C. Paradeise. 1982. Le Prince Bureaucrate. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learned, E.P., C.R. Christensen, K.R. Andrews, and W.D. Guth. 1965. Business policy, text and cases. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I.C. 1978. Strategy formulation: Political concepts. St. Paul: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchesnay, M. 2002. Management stratégique. Paris: Les Editions de l’ADREG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, A.-C. 1984. Management stratégique: Organisation et politique. Paris/Londres: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, A.-C. 1990. Épistémologie de la stratégie. In Épistémologie et sciences de gestion, ed. A.-C. Martinet et al. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, A.-C. 2006. Parties prenantes, management stratégique et politique. In eds. M. Bonnafous-Boucher and Y. Pesqueux. Paris: Editions La Découverte, Recherche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, A.-C., and E. Reynaud. 2001. Shareholders, stakeholders et stratégie. Revue Française de Gestion, (November–December), 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, A.-C., et al. 1990. Epistémologie de la stratégie. Epistémologie et sciences de gestion. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.L., and W.F. Lewis. 1991. A stakeholder approach to marketing management using the value exchange model. European Journal of Marketing 25(8): 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrat, F. 1999. Le gouvernement d’entreprise: ce qui a changé, ce qui va évoluer. Paris: Maxime L. du Mesnil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquero, J. 1980. L’entreprise face aux pressions sociopolitiques de son environnement. PhD thesis, Université des sciences sociales de Grenoble, IAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquero, J. 2008. Entreprise, Développement durable et Théorie des parties prenantes: esquisse d’un arrimage socio-constructionniste. Management International 12: 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, R. 2003. La gouvernance de l’entreprise. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., and R.E. Freeman. 2010. Stakeholders. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., and M. Kramer. 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80(12): 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., and M. Kramer. 2011. Creating shared value. How to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review 89(1/2): 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J.E., L.E. Preston, and S. Sachs. 2002. Redefining the corporation, stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L.E., and J.E. Post. 1975. Private management and public choice: The principle of public responsibility. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., and G. Davies. 2007. The corporate brand: Dealing with multiple stakeholders. Journal of Marketing Management 23(1–2): 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, D. 2007. La résistance du consommateur. Proposition d’un cadre d’analyse. Recherche et Applications en Marketing 22(4): 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, S., and E. Ruhli. 2011. Stakeholders matter. A new paradigm for strategy in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schleifer, A., and R.W. Vishnhy. 1997, Jun. A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance 52(2): 737–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghaas, D. 1973. Conflict formations in contemporary international society. Journal of Peace Research 10(3): 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. 2000. The consensus building handbook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatoni, P., and P. Jarniou. 1975. Les systèmes de gestion: politiques et structures. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuderoz, C. 2010. Qu’est-ce que négocier? Sociologie du compromis et de l’action. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. 2002. Stakeholder value equilibration and the entrepreneurial process. In Ethics and entrepreneurship, eds. R.E. Freeman and S. Venkataraman, 45–57. Charlottesville: Ruffin Series, Philosophy Documentation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2) (April–June): 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A., R.E. Freeman, and P.H. Werhane. 2009. Business ethics: A managerial approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, P. 2008. Les meilleures pratiques de gouvernance d’entreprise. Paris: La Découverte, Repères.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Rendtorff, J.D. (2016). Stakeholder Theory in Strategic Management. In: Stakeholder Theory. SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics