Skip to main content

Environmental Grassroots Partnerships and Potential for Social Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Sustainability from the Himalayas to the Oceans

Abstract

This chapter reviews the concept of social innovation (SI) towards two sets of ecological questions: How can local management actions strengthen ecosystem response to crises? Through what organizational arrangements are ecosystem responses coordinated? The first part of this chapter reviews the concept of social innovation; the second part presents cases from southwest Rajasthan and west Yunnan on social innovation, based on fieldwork conducted in January and August 2011. The cases describe SIs that vary in scale and technology: beehives; improved wood burning stoves; pump sets; working groups to raise funds and share technology; working groups to clean shared water sources; community forest wardens; village councils for water sharing and commons access; and seed banks, land regeneration, child care, and night schools. However these cases can be read as not only demonstrating social innovation but also, in terms of critiques of the policies of neoliberal governments, and in terms of narrative ruptures, puzzles that reveal the push and pull of agential interests in the realm of ecology. The final part of the chapter argues for a focus on the politics of social innovation. As a term SI signifies the possibilities for shifting power structures through networked engagement. Networks including of NGOs must work with state governments to mobilize local people with their own interests. This requires a variety of groups, such as village councils, state-mandated bodies, registered NGOs, and networks, to negotiate and mobilize around ecological response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Jolly D (2001) Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conserv Ecol 5(2):18, http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art18

  • Biggs R, Westley FR, Carpenter SR (2010) Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecol Soc 15(2):9, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art9/

  • Burt RS (1992) Structural holes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella TJ, Godschalk DR (2012) Resilience. In: Crane R, Weber R (eds) The Oxford handbook of urban planning. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp 218–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M (2004) Civil society. Polity, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fougère M, Harding N (2012) On the limits of what can be said about ‘innovation’ interplay and contrasts between academic and policy discourses. In: Sveiby K-E, Gripenberg P, Segercrantz B (eds) Challenging the innovation paradigm. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C (1963) Agricultural involution: the processes of ecological change in Indonesia. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley B (2012) Authoritarian environmentalism and China’s response to climate change. Environ Polit 21(2):287–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin B (2012) Social innovation: Utopias of innovation from c.1830 to the present. Project on the intellectual history of innovation. Working paper no. 11. http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/SocialInnovation_2012.pdf

  • Heider K (1988) The Rashomon effect: when ethnographers disagree. Am Anthropol 90(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu C (2010) Beyond civil society: an organizational perspective on state—NGO relations in the People’s Republic of China. J Civil Soc 6(3):259–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashwan, P, Lobo V (2014) Of rights and regeneration: The politics of governing forest and non-forest commons. In: Lele S, Menon A (eds) Democratizing forest governance in India. Oxford, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing JS (1991) Priests and programmers: technologies of power in the engineered landscape of Bali. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan G, Tucker S, Ali R, Sanders B (2007) Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. The Young Foundation. http://www.youngfoundation.org/files/images/03_07_What_it_is__SAID_pdf

  • Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas N (2009) Against NGOs? A critical perspective on non-governmental action. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 38(4):614–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark D (2011) Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • White House (2013) About SICP—the community solutions Agenda. The White House. N.p., n.d. Web. http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/sicp/about. Accessed 20 May 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am most grateful to Yang Shuo for her invaluable assistance in Baoshan and Tengchong. This report would not have been possible without her selfless, generous, astute and thoughtful questions, translations, and discussion. I am also most grateful to Ronak Shah who accompanied me on field visits around Udaipur, and was a wise, knowledgeable, and considerate companion. I thank Shailendra Tiwari and Neelima Khetan at Seva Mandir, Udaipur, Giridhar at the Deccan Development Society, Hyderabad, and Xu Jianchu, Yang Mei, and He Jun at the Center for Mountain Eco-systems, Kunming, for their assistance during this research. I also thank Martin Fouguère for alerting me to the work of Benoît Godin on innovation studies, and Manjari Mahajan on the work of Seva Mandir. Finally I wish to acknowledge the support and friendship of Sanjay Reddy, Eduardo Staszowski and Mariana Assis, as well as of Shikui Dong, Sanjay Chaturvedi, Victoria Marshall, Jayanta Bandyopadhyay, Ashok Gurung and Grace Hou.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nidhi Srinivas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Srinivas, N. (2017). Environmental Grassroots Partnerships and Potential for Social Innovation. In: Dong, S., Bandyopadhyay, J., Chaturvedi, S. (eds) Environmental Sustainability from the Himalayas to the Oceans. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44037-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics