Skip to main content

Himalayan Biodiversity: Trans-boundary Conservation Institution and Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Sustainability from the Himalayas to the Oceans

Abstract

Himalayan region is a trans-boundary area with rich biodiversity of global importance, while this region has been subject to great human stress and continues to face multiple threats with the global change. Inadequacy of the institutional arrangements and shortcomings of governance practice are challenging the effective conservation of trans-boundary biodiversity in this region. This chapter synthesizes an empirical overview of trans-boundary cooperation in establishing institutions for biodiversity conservation through case study in bordering areas across India, China, Nepal and Bhutan. Based on the hypothesis that trans-boundary biodiversity protection involves understanding tightly coupled interrelationships between natural systems and human society, a theoretic institution framework of sixfold matrix including economic, technical, social, environmental, ethnical/cultural, and political dimensions was structured to promote the efficient trans-boundary biodiversity conservation in the Himalayan region. It was proposed in this chapter that regional institutions, in close collaboration with national governments of member countries, needed to develop a vision for an integrated approach to institutionalize the trans-boundary biodiversity conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bawa KS, Seidler R, Raven HP (2004) Reconciling conservation paradigms. Conserv Biol 18(4):859–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnee J, Toope SJ (1997) Environmental security and freshwater resources: ecosystem regime building. Am J Int Law 91(1):26–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chettri N (2000) Impact of habitat disturbances on bird and butterfly communities along Yuksam-Dzongri trekking trail in Kanchendzonga biosphere reserve. PhD thesis, North Bengal University, Rajaramohanpur, Siliguri, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Chettri N, Sharma E (2006) Assessment of natural resources use patterns: a case study along a trekking corridor of Sikkim Himalaya. Resour Energy Dev 3(2):42–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Chettri N, Sharma E (2016) Reconciling the mountain biodiversity conservation and human wellbeing: drivers of biodiversity loss and new approaches in the Hindu-Kush Himalayas. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 82(1). doi: 10.16943/ptinsa/2016/v82i1/48378

    Google Scholar 

  • Chettri N, Sharma E, Deb DC, Sundriyal RC (2002) Effect of firewood extraction on tree structure, regeneration, and woody biomass productivity in a trekking corridor of the Sikkim Himalaya. Mt Res Dev 22(2):150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chettri N, Shakya B, Sharma E (2008) Biodiversity conservation in the Kangchenjunga landscape. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1998) The Malawi principles as reported. In: Fourth meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity, Bratislava, Slovakia, 4–15 May 1998. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-04/information/cop-04-inf-09-en.pdf

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (2009) Ecosystem definition by the Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/ecosystem/

  • Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) (2005) Ecosystem profile: Indo-Burman hotspot, Eastern Himalayan Region

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong SK, Wen L, Zhu L, Li XY (2010) Implication of coupled natural and human systems in sustainable rangeland ecosystem management in HKH region. Front Earth Sci China 4(1):42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost P, Campbell B, Medina G, Usongo L (2006) Landscape-scale approaches for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest landscapes. Ecol Soc 11(2):30, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art30/

  • Government of Nepal/Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (GoN/MoFSC) (2005) Proceedings of the national stakeholders’ consultation on Sacred Himalayan Landscape in Nepal. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas PM (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) (2009) Mountain biodiversity and climate change. Printed by Pvt Ltd, Kathmandu, Nepal. http://books.icimod.org/uploads/tmp/icimod-mountain_biodiversity_and_climate_change.pdf

  • Ives JD, Messerli B, Spiess E (2004) Mountains of the world: a global priorities. In: Messerli B, Ives JD (eds) Mountains of the world: a global priority. Parthenon Publishing Group, New York, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha A (2002) Ecological prudence for the Lepchas of Sikkim. Tigerpaper 29(1):27–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JL (2006) Transboundary conservation: development implications for communities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 12:266–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DR, Ferraro PJ, Barrett CB (2001) Introduction: changing perspectives on agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment. In: Lee DR, Barrett CB (eds) Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 1–16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lipschutz RD (1997) Damming troubled waters: conflict over the Danube, 1950-2000. Paper delivered at conference on Environment and Security, Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayoral-Phillips AJ (2002) Trans-boundary areas in Southern Africa: meeting the needs of conservation or development? The Commons in an Age of Globalization. In: Ninth conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA, Mainka SA (2009) Conservation for a New Era. IUCN—International Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon S, Pontius RG, Rose J, Khan ML, Bawa KS (2001) Identifying conservation-priority areas in the tropics: a land-use change modeling approach. Conserv Biol 15:501–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe SC (1999) Study on the development of transboundary natural resource management areas in Southern Africa—community perspectives. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Montini M, Bogdanovic S (2011) Environmental security in South-Eastern Europe: international agreements and their implementation. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy ML, Oli KP, Gorzula S (2005) Conservation in conflict: the impact of Moist-government conflict on conservation and biodiversity in Nepal. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier C, Gustava G, da Foseca AB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(24):853–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal SK, Weber KE (1995) The quandary of local people-park relationships in Nepal’s Royal Chitwan National Park. Environ Manag 19(6):853–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oli KP (2005) The potential for transboundary protected area in the Kanchenjunga region of the eastern Himalaya. In: Harmone D, Worboys GL (eds) Managing mountain protected areas: challenges and responses for the 21st century. Andromeda Editrice, Colledara, Italy, pp 158–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai SC, Sharma E, Sundriyal RC (1994) Conservation in the Sikkim Himalaya: traditional knowledge and land use of the Mamlay watershed. Environ Conserv 15:30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan PS (1996) Conserving the sacred: from species to landscape. Nature and natural resources. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi A, Pei SJ, Amatya D (1997) Regional consultation on conservation of the Kangchenjunga mountain ecosystem. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandwith T, Shine C, Hamilton L, Sheppard D (2001) Trans-boundary protected areas for peace and cooperation. In: Phillips A (ed) World commission on protected areas. World Conservation Union, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schild A (2008) The case of the Hindu Kush-Himalayas: ICIMOD’s position on climate change and mountain systems. Mt Res Dev 28(3/4):328–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma E (2008) Developing a trans-boundary biodiversity conservation landscape and conservation corridors in the Kangchenjunga complex. In: Chettri N, Shakya B, Sharma E (eds) Biodiversity conservation in Kangchenjunga landscape. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma E, Acharya R (2004) Summary report on mountain biodiversity in the convention on biological diversity (CBD). Mt Res Dev 24(3):263–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma E, Chettri N (2005) ICIMOD’s transboundary biodiversity management initiative in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas. Mt Res Dev 25(3):280–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma E, Chettri N, Gurung J, Shakya B (2007) The landscape approach in biodiversity conservation: a regional cooperation framework for implementation of the convention on biological diversity in the Kangchenjunga landscape. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma E, Chettri N, Oil KP (2010) Mountain biodiversity conservation and management: a paradigm shift in policies and practices in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas. Ecol Res 25:909–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherpa LN, Peniston B, Lama W, Richard C (2003) Hands around Everest: transboundary cooperation for conservation and sustainable livelihoods. ICIMOD, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Kathmandu, Napal/WWF US-Asian Program, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh J (1999) Study on the development of transboundary natural resource management areas in Southern Africa: lessons learned. Biodiversity Support Programme, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomich TP, van Noordwijk M, Budidarsono S, Gillison A, Kusumanto T, Murdiyarso D, Stolle F, Fagi AM (2001) Agricultural intensification, deforestation and the environment: assessing the tradeoffs in Sumatra, Indonesia. In: Lee DR, Barrett CB (eds) Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 221–244

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Schoik DR, Lelea E, Cunningham J (2004) Sovereignty, borders, and transboundary biodiversity: turning a potential tragedy into a true partnership. An introduction to the theory and practice of conservation biology in the U.S.-Mexican border region. http://www.scerp.org/bi/BI-VI/SCERP.pdf

  • Wikramanayake ED, Capenter C, Strand H, McKnight M (2001) Ecoregion-based conservation in the Eastern Himalaya: identifying important areas of biodiversity conservation. WWF and ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A (2001) Trans-boundary waters: sharing benefits, lessons learned. Thematic background paper presented at the international conference on freshwater, Bonn, Germany, 3–7 Dec 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZF, Dong SK (2010) Understanding coupled human and natural systems in a changing world. Front Earth Sci China 4(1):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonzon P (2005) Impacts of insurgency and conflict on Nepal’s protected areas. In: Harmone D, Worboys GL (eds) Managing mountain protected areas: challenges and responses for the 21st century. Andromeda Editrice, Colledara, Italy, pp 354–357

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the funding organizations including Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (Grant no. 2016YFC0501906), National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Asian Scholar Foundation, India, China Institute of New School, Beijing Normal University for their financial supports. The authors are grateful to the scholars whose articles, tables and figures are cited in this chapter. The authors are most grateful to the farmers/herders, practitioners, and professionals for their cooperation and efforts during my interview. The case study cited here is from the programme supported by ICIMOD’s member countries, its core donors including German Development Cooperation - GIZ and Austrian Development Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shikui Dong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dong, S., Chettri, N., Sharma, E. (2017). Himalayan Biodiversity: Trans-boundary Conservation Institution and Governance. In: Dong, S., Bandyopadhyay, J., Chaturvedi, S. (eds) Environmental Sustainability from the Himalayas to the Oceans. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44037-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics