Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Interventions for Stone Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Consent in Pediatric Urology

Abstract

The incidence of stones in children varies enormously geographically and is approximately 5–20 per 100,000 children aged less than 18 years [1]. A key difference between adult and paediatric stone disease is its recurrent nature. Identifying any underlying metabolic abnormality, reported in 33–93 % in the literature, is therefore essential [2]. Nevertheless, it is important to note that such assessment must not delay the treatment of the stones. At our institution, a metabolic abnormality is found in just under half the children presenting with stones, comprising hypercalciuria (57 %), cystinuria (23 %), hyperoxaluria (17 %) and hyperuricosuria (2 %) [3]. Infection is the second most common aetiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Introduction

  1. Habbig S, Beck B, Hoppe B. Nephrocalcinosis and urolithiasis in children. Kidney Int. 2011;80:1278–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sas DJ. An update on the changing epidemiology and metabolic risk factors in pediatric kidney stone disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2062–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coward RJM, Peters CJ, Duffy PG, et al. Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease in the UK. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88:962–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Erotocritou P, Smeulders N, Green J. Paediatric stones: an overview. J Clin Urol. 2015;8(5):347–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Onal B, Citigez S, Tansu N, et al. What changed in the management of pediatric stones after the introduction of minimally invasive procedures? A single-center experience over 24 years. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:910–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aydogdu O, Karakose A, Celik O, Atesci Y. Recent management of urinary stone disease in a pediatric population. World J Clin Pediatr. 2014;3(1):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. European association of urology guideline on urolithiasis. 2012. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/20_Urolithiasis_LR-March-13-2012.pdf

  8. Landau E. Modern stone management in children. Eur Urol Suppl. 2015;14:12–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smeulders N, Undre S. Minimally invasive interventions for stone disease. In: Godbole PP, Koyle MA, Wilcox DT, editors. Pediatric urology: surgical complications and management. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2015. doi:10.1002/9781118473382.ch16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koyuncu H, Yencilek F, Erturhan S, et al. Clinical course of pediatric urolithaisis: follow up data in a long-term basis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ESWL

  1. Straub M, Gschwend J, Zorn C. Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:1239–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeng G, Jia J, Zhao Z, Wu W, Zhao Z, Zhong W. Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Res. 2012;40:599–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sen H, Seckiner I, Bayrak O, Erturhan S, Demirbag A. Treatment alternatives for urinary system stone disease in preschool aged children: results of 616 cases. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11:34.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Landau E. Modern stone management in children. Eur Urol Suppl. 2015;14:12–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yucel S, Akin Y, Danisman A, Guntekin E. Complications and associated factors of pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 2012;187:1812–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Badawy AA, Saleem MD, Abolyosy A, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44:661–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Habib EI, Morsi HA, Elsheemy MS, et al. Effect of size and site on outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of proximal urinary stones in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:323–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Onal B, Citigez S, Tansu N, et al. Predictive factors and management of steinstrasse after shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis – a multivariate analysis study. Urology. 2012;80:1127–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

URS/RIRS

  1. Sen H, Seckiner I, Bayrak O, Erturhan S, Demirbag A. Treatment alternatives for urinary system stone disease in preschool aged children: results of 616 cases. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11:34.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Erotocritou P, Smeulders N, Green J. Paediatric stones: an overview. J Clin Urol. 2015;8(5):347–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Straub M, Gschwend J, Zorn C. Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:1239–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dogan HS, Onal B, Satar N, et al. Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology Society. J Urol. 2011;186:1035–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aydogdu O, Karakose A, Celik O, Atesci Y. Recent management of urinary stone disease in a pediatric population. World J Clin Pediatr. 2014;3(1):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189:580–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang HH, Huang L, Routh JC, et al. Use of ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy in children. J Urol. 2011;186:1728–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Azili M, Ozturk F, Inozu M, Semsa Çayci F, Acar B, Ozmert S, Tiryaki T. Management of stone disease in infants. Urolithiasis. 2015;43:513–9. doi:10.1007/s00240-015-0788-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Landau E. Modern stone management in children. Eur Urol Suppl. 2015;14:12–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smeulders N, Undre S. Minimally invasive interventions for stone disease. In: Godbole PP, Koyle MA, Wilcox DT, editors. Pediatric urology: surgical complications and management. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2015. doi:10.1002/9781118473382.ch16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tiryaki T, Azili MN, Ozmert S. Ureteroscopy for treatment of ureteral stones in children: factors influencing the outcome. Urology. 2013;81:1047–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elashry OM, Tawfik AM. Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9:691–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sancaktutar AA, Adanur S, Resorlu B, et al. The forgotten ureteral stent in children: from diagnosis to treatment. J Urol. 2013;189:1054–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sen H, Seckiner I, Bayrak O, Erturhan S, Demirbag A. Treatment alternatives for urinary system stone disease in preschool aged children: results of 616 cases. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11:34.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

PCNL

  1. Zeren S, Satar N, Bayazit Y, Payasli K, Ozkeçeli R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric renal calculi. J Endourol. 2002;16:75–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Straub M, Gschwend J, Zorn C. Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:1239–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganpule A, Mishra S, Desai M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for pediatric urolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(4):549–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Onal B, Dogan HS, Satar N, et al. Factors affecting complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology Society. J Urol. 2013;191(3):777–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oner S, Okumus M, Demirbas M, Onen E, Aydos M, Ustun M, Kilic M, Avci S. Factors influencing complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center study. Endourol Stone Dis. 2015;12(05):2317–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bilen CY, Kocak B, Kitirci G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: lessons learned in 5 years at a single institution. J Urol. 2007;177:1867–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Onal B, Citigez S, Tansu N, et al. What changed in the management of pediatric stones after the introduction of minimally invasive procedures? A single-center experience over 24 years. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:910–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guven S, Frattini A, Onal B, on behalf of the CROES PCNL Study Group, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Pecutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. BJU Int. 2012;111:148–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salerno A, Gerocarni Nappoa S, Matarazzo E, De Dominicis M, Caione P. Treatment of pediatric renal stones in a Western country: a changing pattern. J Ped Surg. 2013;48:835–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhageria A, Nayak B, Seth A, et al. Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-centre 10-year experience. J Ped Urol. 2013;9:472–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Veeratterapillay R, Shaw MBK, Williams R, et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of paediatric urolithiasis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:588–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Manohar T, Ganpule AP, Shrivatsav P, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex caliceal calculi and staghorn stones in children less than 5 years of age. J Endourol. 2006;20:547–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dogan HS, Tekgul S. Management of pediatric stone disease. Pediatr Urol. 2007;8:163–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Landau E. Modern stone management in children. Eur Urol Suppl. 2015;14:12–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors? Urology. 2005;66:38–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boormans JL, Scheepe JR, Verkoelen CF, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating renal calculi in children. BJU Int. 2005;95:631–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cystolithotomy

  1. Jeet Singh K, Kaur J. Comparison of three different endoscopic techniques in management of bladder calculi. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(1):10–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gan W, Guo H, Yang R, Lian H, Yao L. Minimally invasive percutaneous cystolithotomy: an effective treatment for bladder stones in infants aged <1 year. BJU Int. 2009;106:275–77.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Straub M, Gschwend J, Zorn C. Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:1239–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tugcu V, Polat H, Ozbay B, Gurbuz N, Eren GA, Tasci AI. Percutaneous versus transurethral cystolithotripsy. J Endourol. 2009;23:237–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Agrawal MS, Aron M, Goyal J, Elhence IP, Asopa HS. Percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy for vesical calculi in children. J Endourol. 1999;13:173–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Marhoon MS, Sarhan OM, Awad BA, et al. Comparison of endourological and open cystolithotomy in the management of bladder stones in children. J Urol. 2009;181:2684–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salah MA, Holman E, Khan AM, et al. Percutaneous cystolithotomy for pediatric endemic bladder stone: experience with 155 cases from 2 developing countries. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:1628–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmadnia H, Kamalati A, Younesi M, et al. Percutaneous treatment of bladder stones in children: 10 years experience, is blind access safe? Pediatr Surg Int. 2013;29:725–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Laparoscopy/Robotic

  1. Kolla S, Wadhwa P, Aron M. Current status of minimally invasive management of pediatric upper urinary tract calculi. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2006;11(2):73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal G. The efficacy, safety & outcomes of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy) and its comparison with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. IJBAR. 2015;6(04):363–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aydogdu O, Karakose A, Celik O, Atesci Y. Recent management of urinary stone disease in a pediatric population. World J Clin Pediatr. 2014;3(1):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Agrawal V, Bajaj J, Acharya H, Chanchalani R, Raina VK, Sharma D. Laparoscopic management of pediatric renal and ureteric stones. J Ped Urol. 2013;9:230–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Straub M, Gschwend J, Zorn C. Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:1239–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG, Albanis S, et al. Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review. Urol Res. 2010;38:337–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee RS, Passerotti CC, Cendron M, Estrada CR, Borer JG, Peters CA. Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol. 2007;177:2306–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meria P, Milcent S, Desgrandchamps F, et al. Management of pelvic stones larger than 20mm: laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol Int. 2005;75:322–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goel A, Hemal AK. Evaluation of role of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy and its comparison with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35:73–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee WC, Hsieh HH. Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy for impacted ureteral stones. Chang Gung Med J. 2000;23:28–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naima Smeulders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Troncoso Solar, B., Smeulders, N. (2016). Minimally Invasive Interventions for Stone Disease. In: Godbole, P., Wilcox, D., Koyle, M. (eds) Consent in Pediatric Urology . Handbook Series of Consent in Pediatric Surgical Subspecialities . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43527-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43527-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43526-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43527-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics