Skip to main content

The Role of Knowledge Keepers in an Artificial Primitive Human Society: An Agent-Based Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems XI (COIN 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9628))

  • 601 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses knowledge accumulation and diffusion mechanisms and their effect on social and institutional change in an artificial society. The focus of this paper is to model the role of knowledge keepers in the context of social control in the CKSW institutional meta-role framework. In literature this role has been associated with helping to maintain social order by spreading social awareness and resolving disputes. In addition to outlining the model of a complex, adaptive, and self-sustaining artificial society, we examine in this context the societal mechanism of violence control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The reputation Gini index shows the relative reputation inequality in a group. In particular, it reveals the gap between agents with very high reputation and agents with low reputation. In order to calculate the Gini index, we implement formula used by [35]. \( Agent_{i} \)’s reputation represented by \( y_{i} \). Then we sort \( y_{i} \), \( i = 1\,to\,n \) in ascending order \( \left( {y_{i} < = y_{i + 1} } \right) \). Finally, Gini is calculated as \( G = \frac{1}{n}\left( {n + 1 - 2\left( {\frac{{\sum\nolimits_{{i =1}}^{n} {\left( {{\text{n}} + 1 - i} \right)y^{1} }}}{{\sum\nolimits_{{i = 1}}^{n} {y_{i} } }}} \right)} \right) \).

References

  1. Huang, H.Q., Macmillan, W.: A generative bottom-up approach to the understanding of the development of rural societies. Agrifood Res. Rep. 68, 296–312 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Macmillan, W., Huang, H.Q.: An agent-based simulation model of a primitive agricultural society. Geoforum 39, 643–658 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Makowsky, M.D., Smaldino, P.E.: The evolution of power and the divergence of cooperative norms. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 126, 75–88 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilbert, N., den Besten, M., Bontovics, A., Craenen, B.G.W., Divina, F., Eiben, A.E., Griffioen, R., Hévízi, G., Lõrincz, A., Paechter, B., Schuster, S., Schut M.C., Tzolov, C., Vogt, P., Yang, L.: Emerging artificial societies through learning. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 9 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tesfatsion, L.: Agent-based computational economics: growing economies from the bottom up. Artif. Life 8, 55–82 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Younger, S.: Leadership, violence, and warfare in small societies. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 14, 8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Younger, S.: Leadership in small societies. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 13, 5 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Younger, S.: Reciprocity, sanctions, and the development of mutual obligation in egalitarian societies. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 8, 9 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Younger, S.M.: Discrete agent simulations of the effect of simple social structures on the benefits of resource sharing. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 6 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Younger, S.: Reciprocity, normative reputation, and the development of mutual obligation in gift-giving societies. JASSS-THE J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 7 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Purvis, M.K., Purvis, M.A.: Institutional expertise in the service-dominant logic: knowing how and knowing what. J. Mark. Manag. 28, 1626–1641 (2012). doi:10.1080/0267257X.2012.742454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Purvis, M., Purvis, M., Frantz, C.: CKSW: a folk-sociological meta-model for agent-based modelling. Social Path Workshop (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jahanbazi, M., Frantz, C., Purvis, M., Purvis, M.: Building an artificial primitive human society: an agent-based approach. In: Ghose, A., et al. (eds.) COIN 2014. LNCS, vol. 9372, pp. 89–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25420-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Makowsky, M.D., Rubin, J.: An agent-based model of centralized institutions, social network technology, and revolution. PLOS ONE 8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cervellati, M., Sunde, U.: Life expectancy and economic growth: the role of the demographic transition. J. Econ. Growth 16, 99–133 (2011). doi:10.2307/41486924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Read, D.W.: Emergent properties in small-scale societies. Artif. Life 9, 419–434 (2003). doi:10.1162/106454603322694852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Axtell, R.L., Epstein, J.M., Dean, J.S., Gumerman, G.J., Swedlund, A.C., Harburger, J., Chakravarty, S., Hammond, R., Parker, J., Parker, M.: Population growth and collapse in a multiagent model of the Kayenta Anasazi in Long House Valley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99(Suppl 3), 7275–7279 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diaz, B.A., Fent, T.: An agent-based simulation model of age-at-marriage norms, pp. 85–116 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Billari, F.C., Prskawetz, A., Diaz, B.A., Fent, T.: The “Wedding-Ring”: an agent-based marriage model based on social interaction. Demogr. Res. 17, 59–82 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bentley, G.R.: Hunter-gatherer energetics and fertility: a reassessment of the! Kung San. Hum. Ecol. 13, 79–109 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Read, D.: Kinship based demographic simulation of societal processes. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 1 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ewert, U.C., Roehl, M., Uhrmacher, A.M.: Hunger and market dynamics in pre-modern communities: insights into the effects of market intervention from a multi-agent model. Hist. Soc. Res. Sozialforsch, 122–150 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lake, M.: Explaining the Past with ABM: On Modelling Philosophy (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00008-4_1

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barceló, J., Del Castillo, F., Del Olmo, R., Mameli, L., Quesada, F.M., Poza, D., Vilà, X.: Simulating Patagonian territoriality in prehistory: space. Front. Netw. Among Hunter-Gatherers (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00008-4_10

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tisue, S., Wilensky, U.: Netlogo: a simple environment for modeling complexity. Int. Conf. Complex Syst., pp 16–21 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boehm, C.: Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Villatoro, D., Andrighetto, G., Brandts, J., Nardin, L.G., Sabater-Mir, J., Conte, R.: The norm-signaling effects of group punishment combining agent-based simulation and laboratory experiments. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 32, 334–353 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S.: Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 328, 617–620 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Fry, D.P., Bjrkqvist, K., Bjorkqvist, K.: Cultural Variation in Conflict Resolution Alternatives to Violence. Taylor & Francis, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wagner, G. The political organization of the Bantu of Kavirondo. Afr. Polit. Syst., 197 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wolff, P.M., Braman, O.R.: Traditional dispute resolution in Micronesia. South Pac. J. Psychol. 11, 44–53 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thiele, J.C., Kurth, W., Grimm, V.: Facilitating parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a cookbook using NetLogo. R. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 17(3), 11 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jahanbazi, M., Frantz, C., Purvis, M., Purvis, M., Nowostawski, M.: Agent-based modelling of primitive human communities. In: Intelligent Advanced Technology, vol. 3, pp. 64–71 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gould, M.: Culture, personality, and emotion in George Herbert mead: a critique of empiricism in cultural sociology. Sociol. Theor. 27, 435–448 (2009). doi:10.2307/40376122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gastwirth, J.L.: The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. Rev. Econ. Stat. 54(3), 306–316 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Epstein, J.M.: Why model? J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 11(4), 12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marzieh Jahanbazi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jahanbazi, M., Frantz, C., Purvis, M., Purvis, M. (2016). The Role of Knowledge Keepers in an Artificial Primitive Human Society: An Agent-Based Approach. In: Dignum, V., Noriega, P., Sensoy, M., Sichman, J. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems XI. COIN 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9628. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42691-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42691-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42690-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42691-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics