Skip to main content

An Empirical Evaluation of the Huginn Constrained Norm-Aware BDI Reasoner

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems XI (COIN 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9628))

  • 569 Accesses

Abstract

A multi-agent system can be helped by a normative system that guides its (autonomous) agents towards an expected behavior. These agents on their side have to reason about the impact of those norms in their personal desires. Considering that agents have limited resources, it is necessary to reason also about available resources and whether they are enough to reach goals generated by norms and desires. The Huggin proposes and implements a deliberation process that uses the concept of mood to reason about norms, desires and resources. The proposed deliberation process is conceived as an optimization problem known as multidimensional knapsack problem with multiple-choice. The computational complexity of this process is NP-complete and thus it can likely be a bottleneck in the agent reasoning cycle. The main goal of this paper is to identify how the desires, norms and resources (input variables) impact in the reasoning cycle execution. Considering the input variables, we empirically measure their impact on the usage percentage of Huginn in the agent overall process time. We conclude in this work that, despite of the process complexity, the impact on the reasoning is acceptable for the usual number of norms, desires and resources of current MAS applications.

The authors are grateful for the support given by CNPq, 156992/2011-6, and 448462/2014-1 and 306301/2012-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To obtain the sample set send an e-mail to: tiagolschmitz@gmail.com.

  2. 2.

    http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk/.

  3. 3.

    Using R Statistical Software.

References

  1. Boella, G., Torre, L., Verhagen, H.: Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Comput. Math. Organ. Theor. 12(2–3), 71–79 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmitz, T.L., Hübner, J.F.: Huginn: Normative reasoning based on mood. In: Bazzan, A.L.C., Pichara, K. (eds.) IBERAMIA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8864, pp. 572–584. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thayer, R.E.: The Biopsychology of Mood and Arousal, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rawls, J.: Two Concepts of Rules. Bobbs-Merrill reprint series in philosophy. Ardent Media, Incorporated (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Searle, J.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969). Cam: [Verschiedene Aufl.]

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Searle, J.R.: The Construction of Social Reality. Free Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thayer, R.E.: The Origin of Everyday Moods: Managing Energy, Tension and Stress, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hansson, B.: An analysis of some deontic logics. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Synthese Library, vol. 33, pp. 121–147. Springer, Netherlands (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kollingbaum, M.J., Norman, T.J.: Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning. In: Boissier, O., Padget, J., Dignum, V., Lindemann, G., Matson, E., Ossowski, S., Sichman, J.S., Vázquez-Salceda, J. (eds.) ANIREM 2005 and OOOP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3913, pp. 183–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Pacheco, N.C.: Using Norms to Control Open Multi-Agent Systems. Tesis doctoral en informática, Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., van der Torre, L.: The BOID architecture: conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, AGENTS 2001, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kellerer, H., Pferschy, U., Pisinger, D.: Knapsack Problems. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Wooldridge, M.: Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason (Wiley Series in Agent Technology). Wiley-Interscience, Chichester (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Makhorin, A.: Gnu Linear Programming Kit, vol. 38. Moscow Aviation Institute, Moscow (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liang, S., Viswanathan, D.: Comprehensive profiling support in the java virtual machine. In: USENIX Conference on Object-Oriented Technologies and Systems - COOTS, pp. 229–242 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carabelea, C., Boissier, O., Castelfranchi, C.: Using social power to enable agents to reason about being part of a group. In: Gleizes, M.-P., Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3451, pp. 166–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Castelfranchi, C.: A micro and macro definition of power. ProtoSociology - Int. J. Interdisc. Res. 18, 208–268 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones, A., Sergot, M.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Criado, N., Argente, E., Botti, V.: Rational strategies for norm compliance in the n-BDI proposal. In: De Vos, M., Fornara, N., Pitt, J.V., Vouros, G. (eds.) COIN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6541, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Alechina, N., Dastani, M., Logan, B.: Programming norm-aware agents. In: Conitzer, V., Winikoff, M., Padgham, L., van der Hoek, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2012), Valencia, Spain, June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dastani, M.: 2APL: A practical agent programming language. Auton. Agent. Multi-agent Syst. 16(3), 214–248 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiago Luiz Schmitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schmitz, T.L., Hübner, J.F. (2016). An Empirical Evaluation of the Huginn Constrained Norm-Aware BDI Reasoner. In: Dignum, V., Noriega, P., Sensoy, M., Sichman, J. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems XI. COIN 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9628. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42691-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42691-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42690-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42691-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics