Skip to main content

Co-management of Protected Areas (PA): A Paradigm Shift in PA Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) in Bangladesh

Part of the book series: World Forests ((WFSE,volume 22))

Abstract

Since 2004, initially the Nishorgo Support Project (NSP) and later Integrated Protected Area Co-management (IPAC) project in collaboration with Bangladesh forest department (FD) have been implementing protected areas (PA) co-management in Bangladesh that aimed to protect rapidly deteriorating forest biodiversity of the country. Drawing on data from the Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary (CWS), in this chapter we examined peoples’ dependency on forest resources of CWS, forest health conditions, functions of co-management structure at local level, and impact on forest conservation. Household and forest trail surveys show that local people are heavily dependent on CWS’s forests for own use and income. Local people clear forestland for betel leaf cultivation, sungrass production, and other agricultural practices. Forest vegetation survey recorded 93 tree species with a density of 239 trees/ha of which seven (07) exotic species contributed 60 %. Nearly 90 % trees belong to 5–15 cm dbh (diameter at breast height) producing a minimum biomass of 33.3 tree/ha. We observed a four-tier co-management governance structure at local level consisted of village conservation forums (VCF), peoples’ forums (PF), community patrol groups (CPG), and co-management committee (CMC) with each component having their own functions. We found a lack of coordination among local-level co-management structure, NSP, IPAC, and FD. Although CMC was empowered by a government order to perform PA management-related functions, NSP or IPAC took all managerial decisions. In official documents, there was existence of VCF, but we noticed no activities during baseline survey although later on they were involved in GIZ project. The gap between promises and actual provisions had created distrust between CPG and others (CMC, NSP, IPAC, and FD). However, CPG’s continuous patrolling reduced the incidence of illegal logging and the CWS is regaining its old forest growth. We recommend several policy implications for reducing misunderstandings among stakeholders and to ensure sustainability of PA co-management in CWS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N (2007) Introduction: moving beyond co-management. In: Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N (eds) Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Begum R (2011) People’s livelihoods and involvement in co-management of Madhupur National Park, Bangladesh. A paper presented at 13th biennial conference of the international association for the study of the commons held in Hyderabad, India. Accessed 10–14 Jan 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manag 90:1692–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BFD (Bangladesh Forest Department) (2015) Bangladesh wildlife master plan 2015–2035. Strengthening reginal cooperation for wildlife protection project (SRCWP). Bangladesh forest department, ministry of environment and forests, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Draft version, p 198. Accessed 4 May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SR, Misbahuzzaman K (2008) Tree species diversity and regeneration traits of the dominant species in a dipterocarp forest in Bangladesh: implications for conservation. Int J Biodivers Sci Manag 4(2):81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borah N, Garkoti SC (2011) Tree species composition, diversity and regeneration patterns in undisturbed and disturbed forests of Barak valley, South Assam, India. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 37(3):131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G, Farvar MT, Nguinguiri JC, Ndangang VA (2000) Co-management of natural resources: organising, negotiating and learning-by-doing. GTZ and IUCN, Kasparek Verlag, Germany, Reprinted in 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO forestry paper 134. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlssona L, Berkes F (2005) Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. J Environ Manag 75:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso E (2011) Co-management redux: anti-politics and transformation in the Ashaninka Communal Reserve, Peru. Int J Herit Stud 17:608–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi NA, Khanna S (1982) Forest mensuration. International Book Distributions, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury MSH, Koike M (2010) An overview on the protected area system for forest conservation in Bangladesh. J For Res 21:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury MSH, Koike M, Rana MP, Muhammed N (2013) Community development through collaborative management of protected areas: evidence from Bangladesh with a case of Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 20:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S (2007) Step zero for fisheries co-management: what precedes implementation. Mar Policy 31:657–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chunati and Jaldi Forest Range (2011) Information was collected from Chunati and Jaldi forest range office on 20.06.2011. Chunati, Chittagong, Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCosse PJ, Mazumder AH, Sharma RA, Ahmad IU, Thompson PM (2012a) Introduction. In: DeCosse PJ, Thompson PM, Ahmad IU, Sharma RA, Mazumder AH (eds) Protected area co-management where people and poverty intersect: lessons from Nishorgo in Bangladesh. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Dhaka, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCosse PJ, Thompson PM, Ahmad IU, Sharma RA, Mazumder AH (eds) (2012b) Protected area co-management where people and poverty intersect: lessons from Nishorgo in Bangladesh. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCosse PJ, Mazumder AH, Roy MK (2012c) The conservation context in 2003. In: DeCosse PJ, Thompson PM, Ahmad IU, Sharma RA, Mazumder AH (eds) Protected area co-management where people and poverty intersect: lessons from Nishorgo in Bangladesh. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Dhaka, pp 17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCosse PJ, Sharma RA, Dutta U, Thompson PM (2012d) Development of the collaborative governance model. In: DeCosse PJ, Thompson PM, Ahmad IU, Sharma RA, Mazumder AH (eds) Protected area co-management where people and poverty intersect: lessons from Nishorgo in Bangladesh. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Dhaka, pp 53–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Feroz SM, Alam MR, Das P, Mamun AA (2014) Community ecology and spatial distribution of trees in a tropical wet evergreen forest in Kaptai national park in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. J For Res 25(2):311–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit) (2015) Final report of the final survey of indicators of “management of natural resources and community forestry project (MNRCF-Chunati)” in Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary (CWS), Chittagong, Bangladesh. GIZ, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • GoB (Government of Bangladesh) (2004) National biodiversity strategy and action plan for bangladesh. ministry of environment and forests, government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Htun NZ, Mizoue N, Yoshida S (2011) Tree species composition and diversity at different levels of disturbance in Popa Mountain Park, Myanmar. Biotropica 43(5):597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones N, Clark JRA, Panteli M, Proikaki M, Dimitrakopoulos PG (2012) Local social capital and the acceptance of protected area policies: an empirical study of two Ramsar river delta ecosystems in northern Greece. J Environ Manag 96:55–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kideghesho JR, Mtoni PE (2008) The potentials for co-management approaches in western Serengeti, Tanzania. Trop Conserv Sci 1:334–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli RK, Singh HP, Rani D (1996) Status of floor vegetation under some monoculture and mix culture plantations in North India. J For Res 1:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse J, Klein D, Braund S, Moorehead L, Simeone B (1998) Co-management of natural resources: a comparison of two caribou management systems. Hum Organ 57:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margalef R (1958) Information theory in ecology. Gen Syst 3:36–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumder AH, Thompson PM (2012) Genesis of the Nishorgo forest co-management experiment. In: DeCosse PJ, Thompson PM, Ahmad IU, Sharma RA, Mazumder AH (eds) Protected area co-management where people and poverty intersect: lessons from Nishorgo in Bangladesh. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Dhaka, pp 29–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael P (1990) Ecological methods for field and laboratory investigation. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming’ate FLM (2012) Potential for co-management approaches to strengthen livelihoods of forest dependent communities: A case study of the Arabuko-Sokoke forest reserve, Kenya. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Lincoln University, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • MoEF (Ministry of Forest and Environment) (2009) Government order issued on 3rd December 2009 by ministry of environment and forests regarding co-management committee for protected area management (in Bengali only). p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PD, Chapman SB (1986) Method in plant ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukul SA, Uddin MB, Uddin MS, Khan MASA, Marzan B (2008) Protected areas of Bangladesh: current status and efficacy for biodiversity conservation. Proc Pakistan Acad Sci 45:59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath TK, Inoue M (2008) How does local governance affect projects’ outcomes? Experience from a participatory forestry project of Bangladesh? Int J Agri Res Govern Ecol 7(6):491–506

    Google Scholar 

  • NSP (Nishorgo Support Project) (2008) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions through co-management of Chunoti wildlife sanctuary. Forest department and Bangladesh forest research institute. Ministry of environment and forest, government of Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Nursey-Bray M, Rist P (2009) Co-management and protected area management: achieving effective management of a contested site, lessons from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (GBRWHA). Mar Policy 33:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda PC, Mahapatra AK, Acharya PK, Debata AK (2013) Plant diversity in tropical deciduous forests of Eastern Ghats, India: a landscape level assessment. Int J Biodivers Conserv 5(10):625–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1966) Species diversity and pattern diversity in the study of ecological succession. J Theor Biol 10:370–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R (2009) The adaptive co-management process: an initial synthesis of representative models and influential variables. Ecol Soc 14(2):24. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art24/

  • Plummer R, Armitage D (2007) A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecol Econ 61:62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, Baird J (2013) Adaptive co-management for climate change adaptation considerations for the Barents region. Sustainability 5:629–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, Fennell DA (2009) Managing protected areas for sustainable tourism: prospects for adaptive co-management. J Sustain Tour 17:149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, FitzGibbon J (2006) People matter: the importance of social capital in the co management of natural resources. Nat Res Forum 30:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, Hashimoto A (2011) Adaptive co-management and the need for situated thinking in collaborative conservation. Hum Dim Wildl: Int J 16(4):222–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, Crona B, Armitage DR, Olsson P, Tengö M, Yudina O (2012) Adaptive co-management: a systematic review and analysis. Ecol Soc 17(3):11. doi:10.5751/ES-04952-170311

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar R, Pandey A, Singh JS (2012) Composition, species diversity, and biomass of the herbaceous community in dry tropical forest of northern India in relation to soil moisture and light intensity. Environmentalist 32:485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker AHMR, Røskaft E (2011) Human attitudes towards the conservation of protected areas: a case study from four protected areas in Bangladesh. Oryx 45:391–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpsons EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultana A, Hussain MS, Rathore D (2014) Diversity of tree vegetation of Rajasthan, India. Trop Ecol 55(3):403–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadele D, Lulekal E, Damtie D, Assefa A (2014) Floristic diversity and regeneration status of woody plants in Zengena forest, a remnant montane forest patch in northwestern Ethiopia. J For Res 25(2):329–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi OP, Tripathi RS (2010) Community composition, structure and management of subtropical vegetation of forests in Meghalaya State, northeast India. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 6(3–4):157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2013) Chunoti co-management committee, Bangladesh. Equator initiative case study series. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurba M, Ross H, Izurieta A, Rist P, Bock E, Berkes F (2012) Building co-management as a process: problem solving through partnerships in aboriginal country, Australia. Environ Manag 49:1130–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tapan Kumar Nath .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nath, T.K., Jashimuddin, M., Inoue, M. (2016). Co-management of Protected Areas (PA): A Paradigm Shift in PA Management. In: Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) in Bangladesh. World Forests, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42387-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics