Skip to main content

Dependence of Contrast-Enhanced Lesion Detection in Contrast-Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Imaging Chain Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9699))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CEDBT) may improve contrast-enhanced lesion conspicuity and relative contrast quantification by improving three-dimensional visualization of lesion morphology, and reducing the integration of attenuation information along the axial direction. Improved visualization of patterns of contrast-enhancement and improved iodine quantification may help differentiate between malignant and benign enhancing lesions. The dependence of dual-energy contrast-enhanced lesion detectability on imaging chain design is investigated. Lesion detectability and relative iodine quantification is comparable for subtraction in either reconstruction or projection domains for both phantom and patient images. SART generally produces greater SDNR than FBP, and scatter correcting projections further improves SDNR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chou, C.-P., Lewin, J.M., Chiang, C.-L., Hung, B.-H., Yang, T.-L., Huang, J.-S., Liao, J.-B., Pan, H.-B.: Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis – comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Eur. J. Radiol. 84(12), 2501–2508 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dromain, C., Thibault, F., Muller, S., Rimareix, F., Delaloge, S., Tardivon, A., Balleyguier, C.: Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur. Radiol. 21, 565–574 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jochelson, M.S., Dershaw, D.D., Sung, J.S., Heerdt, A.S., Thornton, C., Moskowitz, C.S., Ferrara, J., Morris, E.A.: Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266, 743–751 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lobbes, M.B.I., Lalji, U., Houwers, J., Nijssen, E.C., Nelemans, P.J., Van Roozendaal, L., Smidt, M.L., Heuts, E., Wildberger, J.E.: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme. Eur. Radiol. 24, 1668–1676 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luczyńska, E., Heinze-Paluchowska, S., Dyczek, S., Blecharz, P., Rys, J., Reinfuss, M.: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: comparison with conventional mammography and histopathology in 152 women. Korean J. Radiol. 15, 689–696 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baltzer, P.A.T., Benndorf, M., Dietzel, M., Gajda, M., Runnebaum, I.B., Kaiser, W.A.: False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. Am. J. Roentgenol. 194, 1658–1663 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Förnvik, D., Zackrisson, S., Ljungberg, O., Svahn, T., Timberg, P., Tingberg, A., Andersson, I.: Breast tomosynthesis: accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol. 51, 240–247 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Petralia, G., Bonello, L., Priolo, F., Summers, P., Bellomi, M.: Breast MR with special focus on DW-MRI and DCE-MRI. Cancer Imaging 11, 76–90 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Froeling, V., Diekmann, F., Renz, D.M., Fallenberg, E.M., Steffen, I.G., Diekmann, S., Lawaczeck, R., Schmitzberger, F.F.: Correlation of contrast agent kinetics between iodinated contrast-enhanced spectral tomosynthesis and gadolinium-enhanced MRI of breast lesions. Eur. Radiol. 23, 1528–1536 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, Y.-H., Scaduto, D.A., Zhao, W.: Optimization of clinical protocols for contrast enhanced breast imaging. In: Nishikawa, R.M. Whiting, B.R. (eds.) SPIE Medical Imaging, p. 86680G. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Orlando, FL (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, Y., Peng, B., Scaduto, D.A., Zhao, W., Gindi, G.: Application of the ordered-subsets transmission reconstruction algorithm to contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital breast tomosynthesis. In: Proceedings of IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, IEEE NSS/MIC, Seattle, WA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lu, Y., Peng, B., Lau, B.A., Hu, Y., Scaduto, D.A., Zhao, W., Gindi, G.: A scatter correction method for contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 6323–6354 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu, Y.-H., Zhao, W.: Experimental quantification of lesion detectability in contrast enhanced dual energy digital breast tomosynthesis, vol. 8313, pp. 83130A1–83130A10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from NIH (1 R01 CA148053 and 1 R01 EB002655), and Siemens Healthcare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Scaduto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Scaduto, D.A. et al. (2016). Dependence of Contrast-Enhanced Lesion Detection in Contrast-Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Imaging Chain Design. In: Tingberg, A., LÃ¥ng, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics