Skip to main content

Using Formal Methods for Verification and Validation in Railway

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Tests and Proofs (TAP 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9762))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A very promising and efficient method of showing the correctness of a complex system is using formal methods on a model of that system. To this end there exist plentiful methods and tools for easing the mathematically burdensome process of refinement and proofs, as well as the computationally complex task of model checking.

While in todays industrial applications formal methods are mostly used for verification (i.e. for showing that the system model fulfills properties such as completeness and consistency) we propose to use these methods for validation as well (i.e. correspondence of the model with the customer needs).

In this paper we show the applicability as well as the limitations of this approach for feature driven development towards continuous verification and validation. As an example we present a model of a railway interlocking system written in Event-B.

The model can be instantiated and animated, which in combination with model checking and formal proofs demonstrates the usefulness of the approach.

The resulting model can be used again to automatically generate test cases which are suitable to show the correspondence of the implementation and the model, given that the model supports a sufficient level of detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abrial, J.R., Lee, M.K., Neilson, D., Scharbach, P., Sørensen, I.H.: The B-method. In: Prehn, S., Toetenel, H. (eds.) VDM 1991. LNCS, vol. 552, pp. 398–405. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrial, J.R.: Modeling in Event-B: System and Software Engineering. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Aichernig, B., Brandl, H., Jobstl, E., Krenn, W., Schlick, R., Tiran, S.: Momut::UML model-based mutation testing for UML. In: 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Behm, P., Benoit, P., Faivre, A., Meynadier, J.-M.: Météor: a successful application of B in a large project. In: Wing, J.M., Woodcock, J. (eds.) FM 1999. LNCS, vol. 1708, pp. 369–387. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cenelec European Standard: 50126-railway applications: the specification and demonstration of reliability, availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS). European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cenelec European Standard: 50129-railway applications: communication, signalling and processing systems - safety related electronic systems for signalling. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cenelec European Standard: 50128-railway applications: software for railway control and protection systems. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khuu, M.T.: Modeling a safe interlocking using the event-B theory Plug-in. Advance Project (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lamport, L.: Specifying Systems: The TLA+ Language and Tools for Hardware and Software Engineers. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lecomte, T., Servat, T., Pouzancre, G., et al.: Formal methods in safety-critical railway systems. In: 10th Brasilian Symposium on Formal Methods, pp. 29–31 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Singh, N.K.: Using Event-B for Critical Device Software Systems. Springer, London (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007–2013) for CRYSTAL – Critical System Engineering Acceleration Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no. 332830 and by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) project no. 838497.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Tummeltshammer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reichl, K., Fischer, T., Tummeltshammer, P. (2016). Using Formal Methods for Verification and Validation in Railway. In: Aichernig, B., Furia, C. (eds) Tests and Proofs. TAP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41135-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41135-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41134-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41135-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics