Abstract
To manage raw data from Neuroscience experiments we have to cope with the heterogeneity of data formats and the complexity of additional metadata, such as its provenance information, that need to be collected and stored. Although some progress has already been made toward the elaboration of a common description for Neuroscience experimental data, to the best of our knowledge, there is still no widely adopted standard model to describe this kind of data. In order to foster neurocientists to find and to use a structured and comprehensive model with a robust tracking of data provenance, we present a brief evaluation of guidelines and models for representation of raw data from Neuroscience experiments, focusing on how they support provenance tracking.
This work was produced at FAPESP Research, Innovation and Dissemination Center for Neuromathematics (grant 2013/07699-0, S. Paulo Research Foundation).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Goble, C.: Position statement: musings on provenance, workflow and (semantic web) annotations for bioinformatics. In: Workshop on Data Derivation and Provenance, Chicago, vol. 3 (2002)
Gibson, F., et al.: Minimum Information about a Neuroscience Investigation (MINI): Electrophysiology. In: Nat, Precedings (2008)
Frishkoff, G., et al.: Minimal Information for Neural Electromagnetic Ontologies (MINEMO): a standards-compliant method for analysis and integration of event-related potentials (ERP) data. Stan. genomic Sci. 5(2), 211–223 (2011)
Poldrack, R., et al.: Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study. Neuroimage 40(2), 409–414 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ruiz-Olazar, M., Rocha, E.S., Rabaça, S.S., Ribas, C.E., Nascimento, A.S., Braghetto, K.R. (2016). A Review of Guidelines and Models for Representation of Provenance Information from Neuroscience Experiments. In: Mattoso, M., Glavic, B. (eds) Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes. IPAW 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9672. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40593-3_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40593-3_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40592-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40593-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)