Abstract
After the onset of the 2007 financial crisis, Bulgaria and Romania employed a large set of fiscal and investment incentives in order to attract FDI flows. The chapter provides a comparative analysis of the investment promotion strategies of the two countries. The Bulgarian investment promotion agency provides services to foreign investors through every step of the investment process and has a well-organized website, which provides comprehensive information. In the case of Romania, however, a clear strategy to attract FDI to specific sectors of the economy is missing. The analysis highlights that Romania failed to make the relevant business information easily available to potential investors, as so many changes in the promotion agency affected its ability to provide quality information.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For example, Croatia (USD 7,572), Czech Republic (USD 12,705), Estonia (USD 16,664), Hungary (USD 11,151), Latvia (USD 7,635), Lithuania (USD 5,651), Poland (USD 6,594), Slovakia (USD 10,794), and Slovenia (USD 7,352).
References
Banca Naţională a României and Institutul Naţional de Statistică. (2014). Investiţiile străine directe în România în anul 2013 (Foreign Direct Investment in Romania in 2013). Bucureşti: Banca Naţională a României and Institutul Naţional de Statistică.
Bayraktar, N. (2013). Foreign direct investment and investment climate. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5, 83–92.
Bogumil, P. (2014). Composition of capital inflows to Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)—Is Poland different? ECFIN Country Focus, 11(8), 1–9.
Busse, M., & Groizard, J. L. (2008). Foreign direct investment, regulations and growth. The World Economy, 31(7), 861–886.
Chirilă Donciu, E. (2014). Promoting and attracting foreign direct investment. CES Working Papers, 6(3), 17–28.
Department for Foreign Investments and Public-Private Partnerships. (2014). Who we are. http://dpiis.gov.ro/new_dpiis/en/foreign-investments/who-we-are/. Accessed 4 Mar 2014.
Development Counsellors International. (2008). A view from corporate America: Winning strategies in economic development marketing. New York: Development Counsellors International.
ECORYS. (2013). Exchange of good practice in foreign direct investment promotion. Rotterdam: DG Enterprise & Industry.
Gestrin, M. (2014). International investment in Europe: A canary in the coal mine? OECD Insights. http://oecdinsights.org/2014/11/17/international-investment-in-europe-a-canary-in-the-coal-mine/. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.
Harding, T., & Javorcik, B. (2011). Roll out the red carpet and they will come: Investment promotion and FDI inflows. The Economic Journal, 121(557), 1445–1476.
Hornberger, K., Battat, J., & Kusek, P. (2011). Attracting FDI: How much does investment climate matter? (World Bank Group Viewpoint 327). Washington, DC: World Bank.
InvestBulgaria Agency. (2014a). Activities and aims. http://www.investbg.government.bg/en/pages/activities-and-aims-103.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.
InvestBulgaria Agency. (2014b). Website opening page. www.investbg.government.bg. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.
Investment Climate Advisory Services. (2009). Global investment promotion benchmarking 2009: Summary report. Washington, DC: World Bank Investment Climate Advisory Services.
Investment Promotion Agency of Kosovo. (2011). Investment promotion strategy 2011–2013. http://www.invest-ks.org/repository/docs/02_Investment_Promotion_Strategy_656355.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2016.
Jayasuriya, D. (2011). Improvements in the World Bank’s ease of doing business rankings: Do they translate into greater foreign direct investment inflows? (World Bank Policy Research working papers 5787). World Bank.
Kalinova, B., Palerm, A., & Thomsen, S. (2010). OECD’s FDI restrictiveness index: 2010 update (OECD working papers on international investment 2010/03). Paris: OECD.
Kalotay, K. (2010). Patterns of inward FDI in economies in transition. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1(2), 55–76.
OECD. (2010). Investment reform index 2010. Monitoring policies and institutions for direct investment in South-East Europe. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014). OECD FDI regulatory restrictiveness index. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=FDIINDEX#. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.
Romania Trade and Invest. (2012). Romania. InfoBusiness. Romania Trade and Invest: Bucharest.
Şinca, E. (2013). Atractivitatea României pentru investiţii străine directe şi investiţii de portofoliu (Romania’s attractiveness for foreign direct investment and portfolio investment). Bucureşti: Banca Comercială Română.
Szent-Iványi, B., & Vigvári, G. (2012). Spillovers from foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe. An index for measuring a country’s potential to benefit from technology spillovers. Society and Economy, 34(1), 51–72.
UNCTAD. (2013). Optimizing government services: A case for joint investment and trade promotion? The IPA Observer 1.
World Bank. (2006). Doing business 2007: How to reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2007). Doing business 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2012). Doing business 2013: Smarter regulations for small and medium-size enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2015). Doing business historical data sets and trends data. http://www.doingbusiness.org/custom-query. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anton, S.G. (2017). Competitiveness and Investment Promotion in Bulgaria and Romania. In: Szent-Iványi, B. (eds) Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Studies in Economic Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40496-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40496-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40495-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40496-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)