Skip to main content

Competitiveness and Investment Promotion in Bulgaria and Romania

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Transition ((SET))

Abstract

After the onset of the 2007 financial crisis, Bulgaria and Romania employed a large set of fiscal and investment incentives in order to attract FDI flows. The chapter provides a comparative analysis of the investment promotion strategies of the two countries. The Bulgarian investment promotion agency provides services to foreign investors through every step of the investment process and has a well-organized website, which provides comprehensive information. In the case of Romania, however, a clear strategy to attract FDI to specific sectors of the economy is missing. The analysis highlights that Romania failed to make the relevant business information easily available to potential investors, as so many changes in the promotion agency affected its ability to provide quality information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, Croatia (USD 7,572), Czech Republic (USD 12,705), Estonia (USD 16,664), Hungary (USD 11,151), Latvia (USD 7,635), Lithuania (USD 5,651), Poland (USD 6,594), Slovakia (USD 10,794), and Slovenia (USD 7,352).

References

  • Banca NaÅ£ională a României and Institutul NaÅ£ional de Statistică. (2014). InvestiÅ£iile străine directe în România în anul 2013 (Foreign Direct Investment in Romania in 2013). BucureÅŸti: Banca NaÅ£ională a României and Institutul NaÅ£ional de Statistică.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar, N. (2013). Foreign direct investment and investment climate. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogumil, P. (2014). Composition of capital inflows to Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)—Is Poland different? ECFIN Country Focus, 11(8), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, M., & Groizard, J. L. (2008). Foreign direct investment, regulations and growth. The World Economy, 31(7), 861–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirilă Donciu, E. (2014). Promoting and attracting foreign direct investment. CES Working Papers, 6(3), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Foreign Investments and Public-Private Partnerships. (2014). Who we are. http://dpiis.gov.ro/new_dpiis/en/foreign-investments/who-we-are/. Accessed 4 Mar 2014.

  • Development Counsellors International. (2008). A view from corporate America: Winning strategies in economic development marketing. New York: Development Counsellors International.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECORYS. (2013). Exchange of good practice in foreign direct investment promotion. Rotterdam: DG Enterprise & Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gestrin, M. (2014). International investment in Europe: A canary in the coal mine? OECD Insights. http://oecdinsights.org/2014/11/17/international-investment-in-europe-a-canary-in-the-coal-mine/. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.

  • Harding, T., & Javorcik, B. (2011). Roll out the red carpet and they will come: Investment promotion and FDI inflows. The Economic Journal, 121(557), 1445–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, K., Battat, J., & Kusek, P. (2011). Attracting FDI: How much does investment climate matter? (World Bank Group Viewpoint 327). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • InvestBulgaria Agency. (2014a). Activities and aims. http://www.investbg.government.bg/en/pages/activities-and-aims-103.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.

  • InvestBulgaria Agency. (2014b). Website opening page. www.investbg.government.bg. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.

  • Investment Climate Advisory Services. (2009). Global investment promotion benchmarking 2009: Summary report. Washington, DC: World Bank Investment Climate Advisory Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Investment Promotion Agency of Kosovo. (2011). Investment promotion strategy 2011–2013. http://www.invest-ks.org/repository/docs/02_Investment_Promotion_Strategy_656355.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2016.

  • Jayasuriya, D. (2011). Improvements in the World Bank’s ease of doing business rankings: Do they translate into greater foreign direct investment inflows? (World Bank Policy Research working papers 5787). World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinova, B., Palerm, A., & Thomsen, S. (2010). OECD’s FDI restrictiveness index: 2010 update (OECD working papers on international investment 2010/03). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalotay, K. (2010). Patterns of inward FDI in economies in transition. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1(2), 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). Investment reform index 2010. Monitoring policies and institutions for direct investment in South-East Europe. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). OECD FDI regulatory restrictiveness index. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=FDIINDEX#. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.

  • Romania Trade and Invest. (2012). Romania. InfoBusiness. Romania Trade and Invest: Bucharest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åžinca, E. (2013). Atractivitatea României pentru investiÅ£ii străine directe ÅŸi investiÅ£ii de portofoliu (Romania’s attractiveness for foreign direct investment and portfolio investment). BucureÅŸti: Banca Comercială Română.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szent-Iványi, B., & Vigvári, G. (2012). Spillovers from foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe. An index for measuring a country’s potential to benefit from technology spillovers. Society and Economy, 34(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2013). Optimizing government services: A case for joint investment and trade promotion? The IPA Observer 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2006). Doing business 2007: How to reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2007). Doing business 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). Doing business 2013: Smarter regulations for small and medium-size enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2015). Doing business historical data sets and trends data. http://www.doingbusiness.org/custom-query. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anton, S.G. (2017). Competitiveness and Investment Promotion in Bulgaria and Romania. In: Szent-Iványi, B. (eds) Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Studies in Economic Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40496-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40496-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40495-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40496-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics