Skip to main content

Magnetoconductance Switching by Phase Modulation in Arrays of Oval Quantum Billiards

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Control of Magnetotransport in Quantum Billiards

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 927))

  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we employ oval shaped quantum billiards connected by quantum wires as the building blocks of a linear quantum dot array which allows for the control of magnetoconductance in the linear response regime. In particular, we aim at a maximal finite- over zero-field ratio of the magnetoconductance, achieved by optimizing the geometry of the billiards. The switching effect arises from a relative phase change of scattering states in the single oval quantum dot through the applied magnetic field, which lifts a suppression of the transmission characteristic for a certain range of geometry parameters. A sustainable switching ratio is reached for a very low field strength, which is drastically enhanced already in the double-dot array. The impact of disorder is addressed in the form of remote impurity scattering, which poses a temperature dependent lower bound for the switching ratio. Excerpts and figures from Morfonios et al. (Phys. Rev. B, 80(3):035301, 2009) reprinted with permission. Copyright (2009) by the American Physical Society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In [15] the transmission through a two-terminal elliptical cavity is investigated in terms of the effect of finite leads, and for particular values of the semiaxes a clear suppression of transmission is indeed seen which becomes more irregular close to the circular limit.

  2. 2.

    Note that, although the symmetry of the dot (and thereby parity of the eigenstates) and the lead positioning are essential in the description of the transmission features, the nomenclature of nodal pairs serves simply as a handy way of labeling the states for convenient reference. It becomes unambiguous at higher energies where the number of nodes varies along cross-sections in each direction; see, e. g., state ν = 102 in the upper row of Fig. 6.3.

  3. 3.

    In this case, the practically vanishing influence of varying d on the even-n states is not due to a zero overlap with an even y-parity lead state, but due to the fact that odd y-parity billiard states decay exponentially in the lead stubs (and thus reach the ends with practically zero amplitude).

  4. 4.

    Note that the resonant energies in the open system do not happen to coincide with the energies of the corresponding closed dot eigenstates for the stub length chosen in Fig. 6.6b, but for smaller stub lengths. This shows that the transmission spectrum cannot generally be deduced from a given closed dot eigenspectrum.

References

  1. C. Morfonios, D. Buchholz, P. Schmelcher, Magnetoconductance switching in an array of oval quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 80 (3), 035301 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.V. Berry, Regularity and chaos in classical mechanics, illustrated by three deformations of a circular ’billiard’. Eur. J. Phys. 2 (2), 91 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Makino, T. Harayama, Y. Aizawa, Effects of bifurcations on the energy level statistics for oval billiards. Phys. Rev. E 59 (4), 4026 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.B. Boykin, R.C. Bowen, G. Klimeck, Electromagnetic coupling and gauge invariance in the empirical tight-binding method. Phys. Rev. B 63 (24), 245314 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Peierls, Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungselektronen. Z. Phys. 80 (11–12), 763 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Caroli, R. Combescot, P. Nozieres, D. Saint-James, Direct calculation of the tunneling current. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 4 (8), 916 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.S. Fisher, P.A. Lee, Relation between conductivity and transmission matrix. Phys. Rev. B 23 (12), 6851 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Meir, N.S. Wingreen, Landauer formula for the current through an interacting electron region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (16), 2512 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Büttiker, Symmetry of electrical conduction. IBM J. Res. Dev. 32 (3), 317 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, M.Y. Azbel, Quantum oscillations in one-dimensional normal-metal rings. Phys. Rev. A 30 (4), 1982 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Landauer, Electrical resistance of disordered one-dimensional lattices. Phil. Mag. 21 (172), 863 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.F. Bagwell, T.P. Orlando, Landauer’s conductance formula and its generalization to finite voltages. Phys. Rev. B 40 (3), 1456 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Buchholz, P. Drouvelis, P. Schmelcher, Tunable transmission via quantum state evolution in oval quantum dots. Europhys. Lett. 81 (3), 37001 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Zhe-Xian, M. Yi, D. Ze-Jun, Electronic transport through an open elliptic cavity. Chin. Phys. 16 (11), 3507 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Lehoucq, D. Sorensen, C. Yang, ARPACK Users’ Guide (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Rotter, B. Weingartner, N. Rohringer, J. Burgdörfer, Ballistic quantum transport at high energies and high magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B 68 (16), 165302 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.H. Davies, The Physics of Low-Dimensional Semiconductors, An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. S.S. Buchholz, S.F. Fischer, U. Kunze, D. Reuter, A.D. Wieck, Nonlocal Aharonov–Bohm conductance oscillations in an asymmetric quantum ring. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (2), 022107 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Friedland, R. Hey, H. Kostial, R. Klann, K. Ploog, New concept for the reduction of impurity scattering in remotely doped GaAs quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (22), 4616 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Knop, M. Richter, R. Massmann, U. Wieser, U. Kunze, D. Reuter, C. Riedesel, A.D. Wieck, Preparation of electron waveguide devices on GaAs/AlGaAs using negative-tone resist calixarene. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20 (8), 814 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Reuter, D. Kahler, U. Kunze, A.D. Wieck, Layer-compensated selectively doped AlxGa1-xAs/GaAs heterostructures as a base material for nanolithography. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 16 (7), 603 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morfonios, C.V., Schmelcher, P. (2017). Magnetoconductance Switching by Phase Modulation in Arrays of Oval Quantum Billiards . In: Control of Magnetotransport in Quantum Billiards. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 927. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39833-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics