Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Particle Technology Series ((POTS,volume 26))

  • 2041 Accesses

Abstract

The principles on which the performance of a full-scale fluidized-bed reactor may be inferred from that of a cold, scaled-down model are outlined and lead to a review of the scaling rules developed in the recent past. Dimensional analysis based on the Buckingham π-theorem is described as well as the alternative approach based on the governing equations of conservation of mass and momentum of fluidized particles. Examples are given of both rigorous and simplified sets of dimensionless groups appropriate to the scaling process and a description is given of the way they are applied to bubbling beds. This is followed by a consideration of the scaling relationships relevant to circulating fluidized-bed combustors where additional groups such as the Damköhler numbers can be applied. Work on the validation of the scaling rules is then described and leads to a section in which scaling is analysed in terms of the non-linear chaotic behaviour of fluidized beds. The chapter ends with a description of the application of the scaling rules to a scaled-down model of a thermal denitration reactor and its internal structure as revealed by X-ray analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alliston MG, Wu S (1996) SO2 distribution in large CFB combustors and its impact on sorbent requirements. CFB Technology. Science Press, Beijing, pp 327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TB, Jackson R (1967) A fluid-mechanical description of a fluidized bed. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 6:527–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Louge M (1992) Fluid dynamic similarity of circulating fluidized beds. Powder Technol 70:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther ME, Whitehead JC (1978) Fluidization of fine powders at elevated pressures. Fluidization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Diks C, van Zwet WR, Takens F, de Goede J (1996) Detecting differences between delay vector distributions. Phys Rev E 53:2169

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Di Felice R, Rapagna S, Foscolo PU (1992) Dynamic similarity rules: validity check for bubbling and slugging beds. Powder Tech 71:281

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald T, Bushnell D, Crane S, Sheih Y-C (1984) Testing of cold scaled-bed modelling for fluidized-bed combustor. Powder Technol 38:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foscolo PU, Di Felice R, Gibilaro LG, Pistone L, Piccolo V (1990) Scaling relationships for fluidization: the generalised particle bed model. Chem Eng Sci 45:1647–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner CW (1997) Handbook of stochastic methods, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibilaro LG, Hossain I, Foscolo PU (1986) Aggregate behaviour of liquid fluidized beds. Can J Chem Eng 64:931–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibilaro LG (2001) Fluidization-dynamics. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Glicksman LR (1988) Scaling relationships for fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 43:1419–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glicksman LR. Hyre M, Woloshun K (1993) Simplified scaling relations for fluidized beds. Powder Technol 77:177–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Glicksman LR, Hyre MR, Farrell PA (1994) Dynamic similarity in fluidization. Int J Multiph Flow 20:331–386

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glicksman LR (2003) Fluidized-bed scale-up. In: Yang W-C (ed) Handbook of fluidization and fluid-particle systems. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes R, Materazzi M, Gallagher B (2015) 3D printing and X-ray imaging applied to thermal denitration at Sellafield. Nucl Future J 12(6):33

    Google Scholar 

  • Horio M, Nonaka A, Sawa Y (1986) A new similarity rule for fluidized-bed scale-up. AIChE J 32:1466–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horio M, Ishii H, Kobukai Y, Yamanishi N (1989) A scaling law for circulating fluidized beds. J Chem Eng Jpn 22:587–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob KV, Weimer AW (1987) High temperature particulate expansion and minimum bubbling of fine carbon powders. AIChE J 33:1698–1706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leckner B, Werther J (2000) Scale-up of circulating fluidized-bed combustion. Energy Fuels 14:1286–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leckner B, Szentannai P, Winter F (2011) Scale-up of fluidized-bed combustion. A review. Fuel 90:2951–2964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettieri P (2014) Design, manufacture and X-ray Imaging of a scaled down TDN fluid bed reactor. Keynote, Particulate systems analysis conference, Manchester, 15–17 September

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettieri P, Yates JG (2013) New Generation X-ray Imaging for multiphase systems. In: Fluidization XIV, Leeuwenhorst, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Materazzi M, Lettieri P, Holmes R, Gallagher B (2016) Magnox reprocessing TDN reactors: utilising 3D printing and X-ray imaging to re-design and test fluidising air nozzles. In: Proceedings of Waste Management, Phoenix, Arizona

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton D (2004) Revealing the secrets of fluidized beds, exploiting links between academia and industry. Ingenia, (14):47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicastro MT, Glicksman LR (1984) Experimental verification of scaling relationships for fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 39:1381–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy R, Davidson JR (1988) Similarity between gas-fluidized beds at elevated temperature and pressure. Fluidization VI. Engineering Foundation, New York, pp 293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüdisüli M, Schildhauer TJ, Biollaz SMA, van Ommen JR (2012) Scale-up of bubbling fluidized-bed reactors: a review. Powder Technol 217:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson J, Rhodes M (2005) Bubbling fluidized bed scaling laws: Evaluation at large scales. AIChE J 51:2686–2694

    Google Scholar 

  • Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Rand D, Young L-S (eds) Lecture notes in Mathematics vol 898, Dynamical systems and turbulence. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ommen JR, Schouten JC, Coppens M-O, van den Bleek (1999) Monitoring fluidization by dynamic pressure analysis. Chem Eng Technol 22:773–779

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ommen JR, Coppens M-O, van den Bleek CM, Schouten JC (2000) Early warning of agglomeration in fluidized beds by attractor comparison. AIChE J 46:2183–2197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ommen JR, Sanderson J, Nijenhuis J, Rhodes MJ, van den Bleek CM (2004) Reliable validation of the simplified scaling rules for fluidized beds. Fluidization XI Engineering Conferences International, New York, pp 451–458

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ommen JR, Teuling M, Nijenhuis J, van Wachem BGM (2006) Computational validation of the scaling rules for fluidized beds. Powder Technol 163:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MC, Yang RYK (1987) On the scaling laws for bubbling gas-fluidized-bed dynamics. Powder Technol 51:159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John G. Yates .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yates, J.G., Lettieri, P. (2016). Fluidized-Bed Scaling. In: Fluidized-Bed Reactors: Processes and Operating Conditions. Particle Technology Series, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39593-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics