Skip to main content

Competition Law and Policy in Small States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Small States in a Legal World

Part of the book series: The World of Small States ((WSS,volume 1))

  • 842 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will attempt to show that there are many factors associated with a small domestic market that have a bearing on competition law and policy, and therefore, the competition regime of a small state should take these factors into account. Special reference will be made to Malta, where competition legislation is modelled on EU competition law.

This chapter is an updated and revised version of the study titled ‘Competition constraints in small jurisdictions’ published in Bank of Valletta Review number 30 (2004). The author would like to thank Dr Sylvann Aquilina Zahra for her comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On this question see Downes (1988); Jalan (1982); Briguglio (1995).

  2. 2.

    Commonwealth Secretariat (2016): This is the population threshold adopted by the Commonwealth Secretariat.

  3. 3.

    See for example Armstong and Read (1998); Murphy and Smith (1999); Gal (2002); International Competition Network (ICN) (2009); McKoy (2009).

  4. 4.

    Muscat (1998).

  5. 5.

    Brown (2010): To make matters worse, many trained specialists originating from small states often emigrate to larger countries, where their specialised services are better utilised and where remuneration is more attractive.

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    McKoy (2009).

  8. 8.

    Briguglio (1995).

  9. 9.

    Worrell (1992), pp. 9–10.

  10. 10.

    A case in point is when Firm A, an exclusive distributor of Macintosh computers in Malta, unsuccessfully complained to the Office of Fair Competition against another firm (Firm B). Firm B imported these computers from Sicily and sold the computers at a fraction of the price previously charged by Firm A even after adding the Sicilian wholesalers markup and the transport costs. Firm A then appealed against the decision of the office of Fair Competition in the Courts, but the decision of the Office of Fair Competition was upheld.

  11. 11.

    Briguglio (1995).

  12. 12.

    However the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) case law and the European Commission’s decisional practice show that allegedly abusive conduct may fall outside the be defended on grounds of efficiency. See http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52009XC0224(01),paras28etseq.

  13. 13.

    Gal (2001). See also Buttigieg (1999).

  14. 14.

    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2013).

  15. 15.

    Buttigieg (1999).

  16. 16.

    European Commission (2010): This is subject to the so-called ‘pass-on requirement', meaning that consumers should ultimately get a fair share of the benefits. Furthermore, restrictions on competition must be indispensable to achieve the benefits and competition should not be substantially curtailed as a result of the agreement.

  17. 17.

    See Ashurst (2014) for a discussion on possible co-operation agreements between competitors under Competition Law.

  18. 18.

    Article 107(1) TFEU.

  19. 19.

    See http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1404295693570&uri=CELEX:32014R0651.

  20. 20.

    Government of Malta (1993), art 4(4). See http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=10475&l=1

  21. 21.

    See the Control of Concentrations Regulations as first published in the Government Gazette, available at http://justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lp&itemid=18134&l=1

  22. 22.

    ICN (2009), p. 31.

  23. 23.

    See CMS (2014) for a description of merger control regulations of 44 jurisdictions, including those in the following small states: Cyprus, Estonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Montenegro, and Slovenia.

  24. 24.

    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2013).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lino Briguglio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Briguglio, L. (2017). Competition Law and Policy in Small States. In: Butler, P., Morris, C. (eds) Small States in a Legal World. The World of Small States, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39366-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39366-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39365-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39366-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics