Abstract
With the recent move towards activism and engagement with ethical issues through science education it is more important than ever to examine the ethical dimensions of educational policy and practice. In this chapter, I take a theoretical approach to ethics by laying out Foucault’s (1985) ethical relations of self. I argue that politicizing these ethical relations of self is the most viable way to meet the challenges of growing social inequality and climate change. While ethics and egalitarian politics may seem to go hand in hand, I argue that there are some antagonistic elements to the merging of ethics and politics—and suggest some ways to successfully merge emancipatory political perspectives with a focus on ethics as they relate to relations of self. While science education has not been a space where scholars have been encouraged to theorize, this must change if educators are going to find new ways of combatting social and environmental problems.
There is no specific moral action that does not refer to a unified moral conduct; no moral conduct that does not call for the forming of oneself as an ethical subject; and no forming of the ethical subject without modes of subjectivation and an ascetics or practices of self that support them. Moral action is indissociable from these forms of self-activity, and they do not differ any less from one morality to another than do the systems of values, rules, and interdictions.
—Foucault (1985, p. 28)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Bazzul, J. (2014a). Critical discourse analysis and science education texts: Employing Foucauldian notions of discourse and subjectivity. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 36(5), 422–437.
Bazzul, J. (2014b). Tracing “ethical subjectivities” in science education: How biology textbooks can frame ethico-political choices for students. Research in Science Education, 45(1), 23–40.
Bazzul, J. (2015). Towards a politicized notion of citizenship for science education: Engaging the social through dissensus. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 221–233.
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: theories in subjection. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Carter, L. (2011). Gathering in threads in the insensible global world: The wicked problem of globalization and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 1–12.
Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1986). The care of the self (The history of sexuality, vol. 3). New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M., & Senellart, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the college de France, 1978–1979. New York: Picador.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Harding, S. (1993). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 645–670.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Lazzarato, M. (2013). Enunciation and politics. In S. O. Wallenstein & J. Nilsson (Eds.), Foucault, biopolitics, and governmentality (pp. 00–00). E-print: Stockholm.
Lipman, P. (2013). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Chicago: Taylor & Francis.
Rancière, J., & Corcoran, S. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum.
Rancière, J. (2006). The ethical turn of aesthetics and politics. Critical Horizons, 7(1), 1–20.
Roth, W. M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. Psychology Press.
Žižek, S. (2011). Living in the end times (Rev. pbk. ed.). London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bazzul, J. (2016). Egalitarian Politics and the Dimensions of an Ethical Self. In: Ethics and Science Education: How Subjectivity Matters. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39132-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39132-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39130-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39132-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)