Abstract
In this chapter I present and discuss results from the textbook study that was introduced in Chap. 2. I demonstrate that discourses of Ontario biology textbooks position students to address particular ethical issues in very specific ways such as amending law and policy and making changes to personal lifestyles. I argue that discourses of science education inevitably limit the choices for students to engage ethically in science education and that educators need to explore other ways of thinking and acting ethically in science education, such as collective political action (protest and community organizing).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bazzul, J., & Sykes, H. (2011). The secret identity of a biology textbook: Straight and naturally sexed. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(2), 265–286. doi:10.1007/s11422-010-9297-z.
Bazzul, J. (2012). Neoliberal ideology, global capitalism, and science education: Engaging the question of subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 1001–1020. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9413-3.
Bazzul, J. (2014). Tracing “ethical subjectivities” in science education: How biology textbooks can frame ethico-political choices for students. Research in Science Education, 45(1), 23–40.
Bencze, L., & Alsop, S. (Eds.). (2014). Activist science and technology education. Dorecht, NL: Springer.
Blades, D. W. (2006). Levinas and an ethics for science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 647–664.
Blake, L. (2011). McGraw-Hill ryerson biology 12. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
DiGiuseppe, M. (2003). Nelson biology 12. Canada: Nelson Thomson Learning.
DiGiuseppe, M. (2004). Nelson biology 11: College preparation. Toronto: Nelson Thomson Learning.
Dimick, A. S. (2012). Student empowerment in an environmental science classroom: Toward a framework for social justice science education. Science Education, 96(6), 990–1012.
Dunlop, J. (2010). McGraw-Hill ryerson biology 11. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Emdin, C. (2010). Urban science education for the hip-hop generation. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Ethics. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ethic.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1986). The care of the self (The history of sexuality, vol. 3). New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (2003). Ethics of a concerned self. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault, selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 25–42). New York: New Press.
Foucault, M., & Senellart, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the college de France, 1978–1979. New York: Picador.
Foucault, M., Senellart, M., Ewald, F., & Fontana, A. (2007). Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gerlach, N. (2011). Becoming biosubjects: bodies, systems, technologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Sense Publishers.
Levinas, E. (1979). Totality and infinity: an essay on exteriority. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
Levinson, R. (2008). Promoting the role of the personal narrative in teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. Science & Education, 17(8–9), 855–871.
Mensah, F. M. (2009). Confronting assumptions, biases, and stereotypes in preservice teachers’ conceptualizations of science teaching through the use of book club. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 1041–1066.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago press.
Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
Lock, R., & Ratcliffe, M. (1998). Learning about social and ethical applications of science.
Mills, S. (1997). Discourse: The new critical idiom. London and New York: Routledge.
Reiss, M. J. (1999). Teaching ethics in science. Studies in Science Education, 34(1), 115–140.
Reiss, M. (2008). The use of ethical frameworks by students following a new science course for 16–18 year-olds. Science & Education, 17(8–9), 889–902.
Rose, N. S. (2007). Politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sadler, Troy D., & Zeidler, Dana L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science education, 88(1), 4–27.
Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274.
Taylor, V. E., & Winquist, C. E. (2002). Encyclopedia of postmodernism (Taylor & Francis e-Library ed.). London: Routledge.
Simons, M. (2006). Learning as investment: Notes on governmentality and biopolitics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 523–540.
Tolbert, S. (2015). “Because they want to teach you about their culture”: Analyzing effective mentoring conversations between culturally responsible mentors and secondary science teachers of indigenous students in mainstream schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Van Rooy, W. (1993). Teaching controversial issues in the secondary school science classroom. Research in Science Education, 23(1), 317–326; Education, 6, 127–142.
Weber, M., & Andreski, S. (1983). Max Weber on capitalism, bureaucracy, and religion: a selection of texts. London: Allen & Unwin.
Weinstein, M. (2008). Finding science in the school body: Reflections on transgressing the boundaries of science education and the social studies of science. Science Education, 92(3), 389–403.
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and ethical issues in science education: A prelude to action. Science Education, 17(8), 799–803.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.
Žižek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as Farce. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bazzul, J. (2016). The Ethical Subject of Science Education. In: Ethics and Science Education: How Subjectivity Matters. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39132-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39132-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39130-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39132-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)