Skip to main content

Sustainability Accounting: Upgrading Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

The new challenge of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is how to be more accountable towards stakeholders. Accountability is a duty to provide information to stakeholders who have a right to it and is closely linked with notions of corporate social responsibility.

The objective of sustainability accounting is the preparation of accounts concerning organisations’ interactions with society and the natural environment. Sustainability accounting is a framework that can be used to reflect economic, social and environmental impact and demonstrate how they are connected. In practice, however, it is difficult to put together policies that simultaneously promote economic, environmental and social goals. Therefore, different international associations and initiatives have developed frameworks to provide standards and guidance for sustainability reporting (e. g., GRI, UN Global Compact, OECD Guidelines, ISO 26000). Moreover, the European Commission and the European Council expanded the European Union accounting legislation framework to increase the transparency of EU companies and their performance on environmental and social matters, and, therefore, to contribute effectively to long-term economic growth and employment. The new EU Directive 2014/95/EU includes disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups for harmonisation of current reporting practices. A significant contribution to the harmonization of current sustainability reporting practices is provided by the Sustainable Stock Exchanges (SSE) initiative, which brings together exchangers, policy makers and other key stakeholders in accordance with expected UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

The aim of this chapter is to present the opportunities and challenges of sustainability accounting, which provide information about the achieved level of corporate social responsibility (CSR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AA1000 and ISAE3000. (2005). AccountAbility and KPMG sustainability, assurance standards briefing: AA1000 assurance standard and ISAE3000. Retrieved January 12, 2015 from www.accountability21.net

  • AA1000APS. (2009). Accountability in action: How the world’s 100 largest companies measure up to the new accountability principles defined in AA1000APS. Two Tomorrows. Retrieved January 23, 2015 from http://www.twotomorrows.com

  • AA1000AS. (2008). AccountAbility. Retrieved September 23, from www.accountability21.net

  • ACCA. (2013). Association of chartered certified accountants, the business benefits of sustainability reporting in Singapore. Retrieved October 24, 2014 from http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/other-PDFs/sustainability-roundtable.pdf

  • Brown, D., Dillard, J., & Marshall, R. S. (2006). Triple bottom line: A business metaphor for a social construct. Documents de Treball núm. 06/2. Departament d’Economia de l’Empresa, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Retrieved December 21, 2014, from http://ddd.uab.cat/pub/estudis/2006/hdl_2072_2223/UABDT06-2.pdf

  • Carrots and Sticks. (2013). Sustainability reporting policies worldwide—Today’s best practice, tomorrow’s trends. KPMG, Centre for Corporate Governance in Africa, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/carrots-and-sticks.pdf

  • CSR. (2002). Impacts of reporting: The role of social and sustainability reporting in organisational transformation. Europe, and Accountability. Retrieved May 26, 2014 from http://www.zadek.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CSR_AccountAbility_Impacts-of-Reporting_2002.pdf

  • CSR. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: In a global context. Retrieved May 2015 from https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/portal/files/17680296/Chapter_1_CSR.pdf

  • Directive. (2013). The Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013. Official Journal of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive. (2014). The Accounting Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Official Journal of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROPE 2020. (2010). A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. European Commission. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF

  • Fauzi, H., Svensson, G., & Rahman, A. A. (2010). “Triple bottom line” as “sustainable corporate performance”: A proposition for the future. Sustainability, 2, 1345–1360. doi:10.3390/su2051345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEA. (2014). Federation of European accountants. Retrieved May 22, 2014 from http://www.fee.be

  • Frederick, W. C., Post, E. J., & Davis, K. (1992). Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy and ethics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2000). Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: A review and comment. International Journal of Auditing, 4, 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRI. (2013a). Global reporting initiative—G4—Sustainability reporting guidelines: Reporting principles and standard disclosures. Retrieved April 17, 2015, from www.globalreporting.org

  • GRI. (2013b). Global reporting initiative, report or explain: A smart EU policy approach to non-financial information disclosure. Retrieved from www.globalreporting.org

  • GRI G4. (2013). Global reporting initiative sustainability reporting guidelines: Implementation manual. Retrieved from www.globalreporting.org

  • Holme, R., & Watts, P. (2000). Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense. The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Retrieved December 21, 2014, from http://www.wbcsd.org/web/publications/csr2000.pdf

  • IFAC. (2009). Main agenda: Agenda item 5-B—International framework for assurance engagement. International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/meetings/files/5137.pdf

  • IFAC. (2011). Sustainability framework 2.0: Professional accountants as integrators. International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from www.ifac.org

  • IMA. (2008). The evolution of accountability: Sustainability reporting for accountants. USA: Institute of Management Accountants Montvale. Retrieved from http://www.imanet.org/PDFs/Public/Research/SMA/The%20Evolution%20of%20Accountability.pdf

  • ISO 26000. (2014). Guidance on social responsibility—Discovering ISO 26000. Retrieved from www.iso.org

  • Janković, S., & Krivacic, D. (2014). The assurance of sustainability reporting of hotel companies (pp. 51–69). Conference Proceeding 22nd International Conference Tourism and Hospitality Industry, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management Opatija.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (1999). KPMG international survey of environmental reporting 1999. Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/121

  • KPMG. (2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Retrieved from www.kpmg.com/sustainability

  • KPMG, United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), Globar Reporting Initiative (GRI), and Unit for Corporate Governance in Africa. (2010). Carrots and Sticks: Promoting transparency and sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Carrots-And-Sticks-Promoting-Transparency-And-Sustainbability.pdf

  • Lamberton, G. (2005). Sustainability accounting: A brief history and conceptual framework. Accounting Forum, 29, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264115415-en

  • Persic, M., Jankovic, S., & Vlasic, D. (2013). Accounting standards as a support for quality decision making. DIEM 2013—1st Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, Scientific Conference on Innovative Approaches to the Contemporary Economic Problems. Acceptable on http://www.diem-dubrovnik.com/diem/index.php/diem/index/pages/view/proceedings).

  • SASB. (2013). Sustainability accounting standards board, conceptual framework of the sustainability accounting standards board. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from www.sasb.org

  • SBN. (2003). Sustainable business network, enterprise: Your business and the triple bottom line—Economic, environmental, social performance. Retrieved from www.sustainable.org.nz

  • Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., & Burritt, R. (2006). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Development, linkages and reflection. In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, & R. Burritt (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and reporting (pp. 1–34). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2000). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practice. Scheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2006). Corporate sustainability accounting: A catchphrase for compliant corporations or a business decision support for sustainability leaders? In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, & R. Burritt (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and reporting (pp. 37–59). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • SRP. (2012). Sustainability reporting policies, sustainable stock exchange, PRI, UN Global Compact. UNCTAD. Retrieved May 22, 2015 from http://www.sseinitiative.org/sustainability-reporting-policies/

  • SSE. (2014). Sustainable stock exchanges, sustainable stock exchange initiative, 2014 report. Prepared by UNCTAD, PRI—Principles for Responsible Investment, The Global Compact, UNEP—Finance Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2012). The future we want. Resolution adapted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012, 66/288. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from https://worldwewant.de/worldwewant/de/home/file/fileId/19

  • UN. (2013). A new global partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development (The Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda). Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.un.org/sg/management/pdf/HLP_P2015_Report.pdf

  • UNGC. (2013). The UN Global Compact Accenture CEO study on sustainability, United Nations Global Compact and Accenture. Retrieved from http://www.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Accenture-UN-Global-Compact-Acn-CEO-Study-Sustainability-2013.PDF

  • WCED. (1987). The United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, our common future. Retrieved from www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Janković .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peršić, M., Janković, S., Krivačić, D. (2017). Sustainability Accounting: Upgrading Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Aluchna, M., Idowu, S. (eds) The Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39089-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics