Skip to main content

Quantum Measurement of Spins and Magnets, and the Classical Limit of PR-Boxes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantum [Un]Speakables II

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Abstract

Using weak quantum measurements one can determine the direction in which a large ensemble of spins, as in a classical magnet, points. Assume Alice and Bob share a large ensemble of N pairs of spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\). If Alice measures all her spins, all along the same direction, she prepares at a distance an ensemble of spins for Bob which, because of statistical fluctuations, have a magnetic moment of the order \(\sqrt{N}\). By making N large enough, this magnetic moment can be made arbitrarily large, indicating an apparent possibility to signal. However, we show that an arbitrarily large magnetic moment is not necessarily classical in the sense that it might be fundamentally impossible to determine in which direction it points. We also consider stronger than quantum correlations and show that Tsirelson’s bound follows from the physical assumption that in the macroscopic limit all measurements are compatible and that this should not lead to signaling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that it is not necessary to symmetrize \(\Psi _{in}^x\); indeed, the system-pointer interaction being symmetric, a symmetrized \(\Psi _{in}^x\) would lead to the same effect.

  2. 2.

    Note that according to quantum theory \(B_0\) and \(B_1\) (i.e. \(\sum _j\sigma _z ^j\) and \(\sum _j\sigma _x ^j\)) can be measured simultaneously. Indeed, a weak measurement of \(B_0\) with a pointer’ spread of the order \(\sqrt{N}\) essentially doesn’t perturb the quantum state, hence can be followed by a similar weak measurement of \(B_1\). Both measurements provide pretty good information about \(B_0\) and \(B_1\), respectively. Note furthermore that this process can be extended to series of measurements, similarly to [9].

References

  1. M. Navascues, H. Wunderlich, Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 881–890 (2010)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Rohrlich, PR-box correlations have no classical limit, in Quantum Theory: A two Time Success Story (Springer, NY, 2013). arXiv:1407.8530 and arXiv:1408.3125

  3. L. Masanes, A. Acn, N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012112 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Brassard, H. Buhrman, N. Linden, A.A. Methot, A. Tapp, F. Unger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 250401 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Linden, S. Popescu, A.J. Short, A. Winter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 180502 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Pawlowski, T. Paterek, D. Kaszlikowski, V. Scarani, A. Winter, M. Zukowski, Nature 461, 1101 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. von Neunam, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Aharonov, D. Rohrlich, Quantum Paradoxes (Wiley-VCH, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Silva, N. Gisin, Y. Guryanova, S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 250401 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 242, 1 (1998)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Gisin, Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 363 (1989)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. V. Buzek, N. Gisin, Ch. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 170405 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Popescu, D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24(3), 379385 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Fine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. B.S. Cirel’son, Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93 (1980)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Navascues, S. Pironio, A. AcĂ­n, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010401 (2007). New J. Phys. 10, 073013 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Navascues, Y. Guryanova, M. Hoban, A. Acin, Nat. Commun. 6, 6288 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work profited from numerous comments from colleagues from Bristol and Barcelona and discussions after my presentation at the DIQIP meeting in May 2013. I am especially in debt to Sandu Popescu for numerous stimulating discussions and debates and to Daniel Rohrlich for sending me his draft [2] before publication. Financial support by the European projects ERA-NET DIQIP and ERC-AG MEC are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Gisin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gisin, N. (2017). Quantum Measurement of Spins and Magnets, and the Classical Limit of PR-Boxes. In: Bertlmann, R., Zeilinger, A. (eds) Quantum [Un]Speakables II. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38987-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics