Skip to main content

Abstract

Public design can be understood as a perspective that follows democratic approaches to design, addresses collective conditions, and supports the formation of publics. In this paper, we present our efforts to engage with a public design perspective in a case study addressing the topic of dyslexia. The paper contributes to the understanding of the process of articulation of matters of concern in public design. In addition, the results can be considered as opportunities for design that can serve as inspiration for other projects addressing the topic of dyslexia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andersen LB, Danholt P, Halskov K, Hansen NB, Lauritsen P (2015) Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design. CoDesign 11(3–4):250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Björgvinsson E, Ehn P, Hillgren PA (2010) Participatory design and democratizing innovation. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial participatory design conference. ACM, pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunswick N (2012) Supporting dyslexic adults in higher education and the workplace. Wiley, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Dewey J, Rogers ML (2012) The public and its problems: an essay in political inquiry. Penn State Press, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  6. DiSalvo C, Lukens J, Lodato T, Jenkins T, Kim T (2014) Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 2397–2406

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elliott JG, Grigorenko EL (2014) The dyslexia debate, vol 14. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenfield A (2013) Against the smart city

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khakhar J, Madhvanath S (2010) Jollymate: assistive technology for young children with dyslexia. In: Frontiers in handwriting recognition (ICFHR), 2010 international conference on IEEE, pp 576–580

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kvale S (2008) Doing interviews. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Latour B (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Crit Inq 30(2):225–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Dantec CA, DiSalvo C (2013) Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Soc Stud Sci 43(2):241–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neustaedter C, Sengers P (2012) Autobiographical design in HCI research: designing and learning through use-it-yourself. In: Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. ACM, pp 514–523

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pandey S, Srivastava S (2011) Tiblo: a tangible learning aid for children with dyslexia. In: Procedings of the second conference on creativity and innovation in design. ACM, pp 211–220

    Google Scholar 

  15. Preece J (2000) Online communities: designing usability and supporting socialbilty. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action, vol 5126. Basic books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simonsen J, Robertson T (eds) (2012) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Telier A, Binder T, De Michelis G, Ehn P, Jacucci G, Wagner I (2011) Design things. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tittarelli M, Marti P, Peppoloni D (2014) Rapping dyslexia: learning rhythm, rhyme and flow in dyslexic children. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: fun, fast, foundational. ACM, October, pp 865–870

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Someren MW, Barnard YF, Sandberg JA (1994) The think aloud method: a practical guide to modelling cognitive processes, vol 2. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wood LE (1997) User interface design: bridging the gap from user requirements to design. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Maurizio Teli for his comments and participation in the research and analysis. The analysis that has brought to this paper has been possible thanks to the funding granted by the Ministero dell’Istruzione, Universita’ e Ricerca through the project “Citta’ Educante”, project code CTN01_00034_393801.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Menéndez-Blanco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Menéndez-Blanco, M., De Angeli, A. (2016). “Matters of Concern” as Design Opportunities. In: De Angeli, A., Bannon, L., Marti, P., Bordin, S. (eds) COOP 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 23-27 May 2016, Trento, Italy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33463-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33464-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics