Abstract
The paper suggests that in a modern context, where value pluralism is a prevailing and possibly even ethically desirable interaction condition, institutional economics provides a more viable business ethics than behavioural business ethics, such as Kantiansim or religious spiritual ethics. The paper explains how the institutional economic approach to business ethics analyses morality with regard to an interaction process, and favours non-behavioural, situational intervention with incentive structures and with capital exchange. The paper argues that this approach may have to be prioritised over behavioural business ethics which tends to analyse morality at the level of the individual and which favours behavioural intervention with the individual’s value, norm and belief system, e.g. through ethical pedagogy. Quaker ethics is taken as an example of behavioural ethics. The paper concludes that through the conceptual grounding of behavioural ethics in the economic approach, theoretical and practical limitations of behavioural ethics as encountered in a modern context can be relaxed. Probably only then can behavioural ethics still contribute to raising moral standards in interactions amongst the members (stakeholders) of a single firm, and equally, amongst (the stakeholders of) different firms.
This chapter reproduces revised material that has previously been published in S. Wagner-Tsukamoto, “Contrasting the Behavioural Business Ethics Approach and the Institutional Economic Approach to Business Ethics: Insights From the Study of Quaker Employers”, Journal of Business Ethics 82, 4: 835–850. We thank Springer Science + Business Media B.V. for their permission to reproduce it here.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
As discussed below, such principles of behavioural ethics can, to a considerable but not full degree be reconstructed through an economic approach to ethics.
- 2.
See, for example, Fort (2000) who reviewed Donaldson and Dunfee’s approach.
- 3.
Besides, behavioural researchers often interpret personal gain merely on empirical-behavioural grounds. However, the idea of self-interest, as applied in economic research, may have to be methodically interpreted in the first place (Wagner-Tsukamoto 2003).
- 4.
The present paper here shares Cima and Schubeck’s (2001) position that self-love can constitute a sound conceptual starting point for moral philosophy. But differences exist (1) regarding the present paper’s moral evaluation of pareto-inferiority or ‘economic injustice’, as Cima and Schubeck might call it; (2) regarding the present paper’s positive evaluation of governmental intervention and the restriction of individual liberty; (3) regarding the present paper’s suggestions on realigning economics with behavioural ethics through the concept of ethical capital; (4) regarding a methodological interpretation of self-interest.
- 5.
For other types of stakeholder interactions, such as firm-customer interactions, cooperation (pareto-superiority) stands a better chance of comprehensively reflecting an economic understanding of morality.
- 6.
- 7.
It was probably no coincidence that moral philosophers like Adam Smith or Mill who seriously began to question the role of behavioural ethics had, in the wake of industrialization, intensively encountered modernity.
- 8.
Whether stakeholders were here conceptualised as utilitarians, religious believers, virtuous persons, etc. can be left to behavioural ethics and behavioural (economic) research.
- 9.
The failure of communist societies to create the ‘new good man’ (Buchanan 1987b, p. 275, footnote 9) tells a similar story.
References
Argyris, C. 1992. On organizational learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Berle Jr., A.A., and G.C. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
Buchanan, J.M. 1975. The limits of liberty. Between anarchy and leviathan. Chicago/Ill: University of Chicago Press.
Buchanan, J.M. 1987a. Economics: between predictive science and moral philosophy. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press.
Buchanan, J.M. 1987b. The constitution of economic policy. American Economic Review 77: 243–250.
Child, J. 1964. Quaker employers and industrial relations. Sociological Review 12(3): 293–313.
Cima, L.R., and T.L. Schubeck. 2001. Self-interest, love, and economic justice: a dialogue between classical economic liberalism and catholic social teaching. Journal of Business Ethics 30(3): 213–231.
Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405.
Coase, R.H. 1984. The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 140(1): 229–231.
Coase, R.H. 1992. The institutional structures of production. American Economic Review 82: 713–719.
Cochran, T.C. 1957. The American business system. Cambridge/Mass: Harvard University Press.
Cochran, T.C. 1972. Social change in industrial society. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Collins, D. 2000. Virtuous individuals, organizations and political economy. Journal of Business Ethics 26(4): 319–340.
Donaldson, T., and T.W. Dunfee. 1999. Ties that bind. A social contracts approach to business ethics. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
Eggertson, T. 1993. Mental models and social values: north’s institutions and credible commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149(1): 24–28.
Etzioni, A. 1988. The moral dimension. Towards a New Economics: Free Press, New York.
Etzioni, A. 1991. The spirit of community. Rights responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. London: Fontana.
Fort, T.L. 2000. A review of Donaldson and Dunfee’s ties that bind: a social contracts approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 28(4): 383–387.
Frank, R.H. 1988. Passions within reasons: the strategic role of the economics. London: W. W. Norton & Company.
Frank, R.H. 2003. What price the moral high ground? Ethical dilemmas in competitive environments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Friedman, M. 1970, The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, New York Times Magazine, 13 Sept 1970, pp. 32–33, 122–126.
Gambetta, D. 1988. ‘Can we trust trust? In Trust making and breaking cooperative relations, ed. D. Gambetta, 213–237. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gerecke, U. 1997, Soziale Ordnung in der modernen Gesellschaft. Doctoral Dissertation, Eichstaett: Catholic University of Eichstaett at Ingolstadt, Germany.
Gordon, B. 1989. The economic problem in biblical and patristic thought. New York: E. J. Brill.
Gosling, J. C. B. 1973, Plato. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Habermas, J. 1988, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns: Vol. 1 and 2. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Hayek, F. 1960. The constitution of liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hayek, F. 1976. Law, legislation and liberty: the mirage of social justice, vol. 2. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Heyne, P. 1999. The economic way of thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hill, A., and I. Stewart. 1999. Character education in business schools: pedagogical strategies. Teaching Business Ethics 3(2): 179–193.
Himmelfarb, G. 1995. The de-moralization of society. London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit.
Hodgson, G. 2006. What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues 40(1): 1–25.
Homann, K. 1990, ‘Ökonomik und Ethik’. Conference Paper (5th Symposium ‘Kirche heute’, 11–13 Oct 1990, Augsburg, Germany).
Homann, K. 1997, ‘Sinn und Grenze der ökonomischen Methode in der Wirtschaftsethik’, Volkswirtschaftliche Schriften 478, pp. 1–42.
Homann, K. 1999. Zur Grundlegung einer modernen Gesellschafts- and Sozialpolitik: Das Problem der Sozialen Ordnung. In Soziale Marktwirtschaft im nächsten Jahrtausend, ed. U. Blum, W. Esswein, E. Greipl, H. Hereth, and S. Müller, 119–148. Stuttgart, Germany: Schaeffer-Poeschel.
Homann, K., and A. Suchanek. 2000. Ökonomik: Eine Einführung. Tuebingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Izzo, G. 2000. Compulsory ethics education and the cognitive moral development of salespeople: a quasi-experimental assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 28(3): 223–241.
Key, S. 1997. Teaching managers to respond ethically to organizational crises: an inquiry into the case method. Teaching Business Ethics 1(2): 197–211.
Kieser, A. 1993. Human-relations bewegung und organisationstheorie. In Organisationstheorien, ed. A. Kieser, 95–126. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
Kirby, M.W. 1984. Men of business and politics. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Küng, H. 1999, ‘Leitplanken für die Moral’, Der Spiegel 51, 20 Dec 1999, pp. 70–73.
Lampe, M. 1997. Increasing the effectiveness in teaching ethics to undergraduate business students. Teaching Business Ethics 1(1): 3–19.
Luetge, C. 2005. Economic ethics, business ethics and the idea of mutual advantages. Business Ethics. A European Review 14: 108–118.
Luhmann, N. 1984, Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt).
Luhmann, N. 1988. ‘Familiarity, confidence, trust. Problems and alternatives. In Trust making and breaking cooperative relations, ed. D. Gambetta, 94–107. Oxford: Blackwell.
MacIntyre, A. 1985. After virtue. London: Duckworth.
March, J.G. 1978. Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of rational choice. Bell Journal of Economics 9: 587–608.
Margolis, H. 1982. Selfishness, altruism and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, P.E. 1998. Character and virtue ethics in international marketing: an agenda for managers, researchers and educators. Journal of Business Ethics 18(1): 107–124.
North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. 1993a. Institutions and credible commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149(1): 11–23.
North, D. 1993b. Institutions and economic performance. In Rationality, institutions and economic methodology, ed. U. Mäki, B. Gustafsson, and C. Knudsen, 242–261. London: Routledge.
Popper, K. 1957. The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. 1962. The open society and its enemies: the spell of plato, vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rathenau, W. 1918. Von kommenden Dingen. Berlin: S. Fischer.
Schanz, G. 1982, Organisationsgestaltung. Struktur und Verhalten Muenchen: Vahlen.
Schein, E. 1980. Organizational psychology. London: Prentice-Hall.
Sen, A.K. 1990. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. In Beyond self-interest, ed. J.J. Mansbridge, 25–43. Chicago/Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Seshadri, S., G.M. Broekemier, and J.W. Nelson. 1997. Business ethics—to teach or not to teach? Teaching Business Ethics 1(3): 303–313.
Simon, H.A. 1976. Administrative behavior, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
Simon, H.A. 1993. Altruism and economics. The American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 83(2): 156–161.
Siu, N.Y., J.R. Dickinson, and B.Y. Lee. 2000. Ethical evaluations of personal religiousness. Teaching Business Ethics 4(3): 239–256.
Smith, Adam. 1976. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, 2 Volumes. Oxford: Clarendon.
van Oosterhout, J.H., P.P. Heugens, and M. Kaptein. 2006. ‘The internal morality of contracting: advancing the contractualist endeavor in business ethics. Academy of Management Review 31: 521–539.
Vanberg, V. 2001. The constitution of markets. London: Routledge.
Vernon, A. 1958. A quaker business man. The life of Joseph Rowntree 1836–1925. London: G. Allen and Unwin.
Von Dran, G.M., E.S. Callahan, and H.V. Taylor. 2001. Can students’ academic integrity be improved? Attitudes and behaviors before and after implementation of an academic integrity policy. Teaching Business Ethics 5(1): 35–58.
Wagner, S.A. 1997. Understanding green consumer behaviour. London: Routledge.
Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2001. Economics of genesis: on the institutional economic deciphering and reconstruction of the stories of the Bible. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 12(3): 249–287.
Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2003. Human nature and organization theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2005. An economic approach to business ethics: moral agency of the firm and the enabling and constraining effects of economic institutions and interactions in a market economy. Journal of Business Ethics 60(1): 75–89.
Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2007a. An institutional economic reconstruction of scientific management: on the lost theoretical logic of taylorism. Academy of Management Review 32(1): 105–117.
Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2007b. Moral agency, profits and the firm: economic revisions to the Friedman Theorem. Journal of Business Ethics 70(2): 209–220.
Warner, M. 1994. Organizational behaviour revisited. Human Relations 47(10): 1151–1166.
Weber, M. 1974. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Urwin University Books.
Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana.
Williams, B. 1988. Formal structures and social reality. In Trust making and breaking cooperative relations, ed. D. Gambetta, 3–13. Oxford: Blackwell.
Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies. Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.
Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O.E. 1998, Human actors and economic organization. Conference Paper. Vienna: 7th Biannual Meeting of the International Joseph Schumpeter Society, June 1998.
Windsor, D.B. 1980. The quaker enterprise. Friends in business. London: F. Muller.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. (2016). Contrasting the Behavioural Business Ethics Approach and the Institutional Economic Approach to Business Ethics: Insights from the Study of Quaker Employers. In: Luetge, C., Mukerji, N. (eds) Order Ethics: An Ethical Framework for the Social Market Economy . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33151-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33151-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33149-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33151-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)