Abstract
Sustainability is a normative topic framed by disciplinary perspectives. This can be problematic as the tools that are used and applied to meta-problems and ‘grand challenges’ associated with societal (un)sustainability, and which may result in proposed ‘sustainable solutions’, are framed through the lens of the ‘object world’ disciplinarian. Traditional engineering education and practice has tended to frame problems in narrow techno-economic terms, often neglecting broader social, environmental, ethical and political issues; or what might be termed the social complexities of problems (Bucciarelli 2008; Mulder et al. 2012). This reductionist approach has sought to close down risk and uncertainty through deterministic modelling and design, resulting in frameworks/models which provide an air of misplaced confidence but which are incapable of accounting for (or recognising) unknowability, and can thus lead to behaviour which ironically, results in increased fragility, rather than promoting increased robustness or resilience. Researchers in the social sciences and humanities are inherently more comfortable and adept with dealing with complexity, uncertainty and unknowability. This paper is posited in this context, whereby chemical engineering and sociology students taking respective disciplinary sustainability/environmental modules were brought together to work on a common assignment dealing with some aspect of sustainability. This paper reflects on this collaborative exercise, including the experiences of the students themselves, alongside some challenges and successes. It concludes that transdisciplinary approaches to learning are not just desirable in addressing wicked and meta-problems when addressing challenges of (un)sustainability, but represent a sine qua non for building the social capacity in confronting these issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bucciarelli, L. L. (2008). Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 141–149.
Byrne, E. P., & Mullally, G. (2014). Educating engineers to embrace complexity and context. Engineering Sustainability: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 167(6), 1–8.
Byrne, E. P., Sage, C., & Mullally, G. (2013). New paradigm thinking—alternative visions transcending the disciplines, orientation paper and primer for discussion trans-disciplinary conversations on transitions to sustainability. In Proceedings from Trans-disciplinary conversations on transitions to sustainability. Cork, 5–6 Sept. http://www.ucc.ie/sustainabilityinsociety/conference/proceedings/. Last Accessed 10 Dec 2015.
Byrne, E. P., Mullally, G., & Sage, C. (2016). Transdisciplinary perspectives on transitions to sustainability. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hirsch, H. G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmannd, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 119–128.
Hofkirchner, W. (2009). The challenge of complexity: social and human sciences in the information age, center for the critical study of global power and politics. Discussion Paper CSGP D4/09. http://www.trentu.ca/globalpolitics/documents/Discussion094Hofkirchner.pdf. Last Accessed 10 Dec 2015.
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., et al. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43.
Morin, E., (1999). Homeland earth. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Mulder, K. F., Segalàs, J., & Ferrer-Balas, D. (2012). How to educate engineers for/in sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(3), 211–218.
Mullally, G., Byrne, E. P. (2014). Smart grid, social innovation the smart society: The generation, transmission and distribution of discontent in post celtic tiger Ireland. In: Proceedings from ESEIA-IGS Conference, Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions Twente, 24–25 Apr.
Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53, 5–16.
Morin, E. (2008). On Complexity. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
Nicolescu, B. (2012). Transdisciplinarity and Sustainability. Texas: TheATLAS Publishing.
Snow, C. P. (1965). The two cultures; and A second look: an expanded version of the two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UCC. (2011). Sustainability in Society. http://www.ucc.ie/sustainabilityinsociety/. Last Accessed 10 Dec 2015.
UCC. (2012). Sustainability & Modern Society Seminar Series. Cork, 2 Oct–20 Nov. http://www.ucc.ie/en/sustainabilityinsociety/events/sustainability/. Last Accessed 10 Dec 2015.
UCC. (2013). Trans-Disciplinary Conversations on Transitions to Sustainability Conference. Cork, 5–6 Sept 2013. http://www.ucc.ie/sustainabilityinsociety/conference/. Last Accessed 10 Dec 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Byrne, E.P., Mullally, G. (2016). Seeing Beyond Silos: Transdisciplinary Approaches to Education as a Means of Addressing Sustainability Issues. In: Leal Filho, W., Nesbit, S. (eds) New Developments in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32933-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32933-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32932-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32933-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)