Skip to main content

Fragmentation and Central Control: Competing Forces in a Disunited Kingdom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Decentralisation in Europe
  • 811 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter first analyses the historical experiences of the four principal territories within the UK to explain why substantial powers have been devolved to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland—but not to England. It describes the current ‘asymmetric’ governance structures in the different parts of the UK and also the institutions and practices that aim to keep the system ‘united’. Legally and politically, the UK remains a unitary state with power concentrated at the centre, as shown by serious reductions in the autonomy of local governments. The chapter concludes that, despite the devolution to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, the UK is not a decentralised state. Even the new parliaments have little protection in a country without a Constitution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • All-Wales Convention. (2009). Our conclusions at a glance. www.allwalesconvention.org.

  • Bogdanor, V. (2001). Devolution in the United Kingdom (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J., & Horton, S. (2013). Public management in the United Kingdom. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J., & Pyper, R. (2008). Britain’s modernised civil service. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, T. (2000). Local government in Britain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. (1998). Devolution and the civil service: Staff guidance. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. (2000). Directory of civil service guidance 1. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. (2015). Civil service management code. Web-only, www.gov.uk/government/publications/civil-servants-terms-and-conditions

  • Calman Commission. (2008). The future of Scottish devolution within the union: A first report. Edinburgh: Commission on Scottish Devolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calman Commission. (2009). Serving Scotland better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st century (final report). Edinburgh: Commission on Scottish Devolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2006). Strong and prosperous communities: The local government white paper (Cm 6939). London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR)/Cabinet Office. (2002). Your region, your choice: Revitalising the English regions (Cm 5511). London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, R. (2000). Regional government in England: Three policies in search of a strategy. In S. Chen & T. Wright (Eds.), The English question (pp. 29–44). London: The Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. (2004). The politics of identity: Wales. In M. O’Neill (Ed.), Devolution and British politics (pp. 113–134). Harlow: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C. (2006). Devolution and the lopsided state. In P. Dunleavy, R. Heffernan, P. Cowley, & C. Hay (Eds.), Developments in British politics 8. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (1998). The new regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial restructuring and political change. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour Party Regional Policy Commission. (1996). Renewing the regions: Strategies for regional economic development. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberal Democrat Party. (1993). Here we stand: Liberal democrat policies for modernising Britain’s democracy. London: Liberal Democrat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2003). Devolution and the future of the union. In J. Fisher, D. Denver, & J. Benyon (Eds.), Central debates in British politics (pp. 33–47). Harlow: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughtie, J. (2001). The rivals: The intimate story of a political marriage. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (2004a). State building and national integration in Britain. In M. O’Neill (Ed.), Devolution and British politics (pp. 13–31). Harlow: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (2004b). Challenging the centre: Home rule movements. In M. O’Neill (Ed.), Devolution and British politics (pp. 32–64). Harlow: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (2004c). Politicising territorial identity: Theorems of change. In M. O’Neill (Ed.), Devolution and British politics (pp. 67–89). Harlow: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, I. (2004). Report of the commission on the powers and electoral arrangements of the National Assembly of Wales. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, M. (2009). Local authority leaders boards. House of Commons Library Standard Note, SN/PC/05069, London: House of Commons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotland Office. (2009). Scotland’s future in the United Kingdom (Cm 7388). London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Executive. (2006). Civil service code (Scottish executive version). Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Government/civilservicecode/code.

  • Scottish Executive. (2007). Concordat between the Department for Transport and the Scottish Executive (2nd ed.). Web-only, www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2007/03/26102245/0

  • Smith Commission. (2014). Report of the Smith Commission for further devolution of powers to the Scottish Parliament (www.smith-commission.scot).

  • Stevens, C. (2004). English regional government. In M. O’Neill (Ed.), Devolution and British politics (pp. 251–268). Harlow: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, J. (2004). Northern Ireland. In B. Jones, D. Kavanagh, M. Moran, & P. Norton (Eds.), Politics UK (pp. 719–741). Harlow: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • West Midlands Regional Assembly. (2008). Transforming transport: Strategic review 2000–2008, consultation draft. West Midlands Regional Assembly: Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilford, R. (2004). Northern Ireland: Resolving an ancient quarrel? In M. O’Neill (Ed.), Devolution and British politics (pp. 135–167). Harlow: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to June Burnham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burnham, J. (2017). Fragmentation and Central Control: Competing Forces in a Disunited Kingdom. In: Ruano, J., Profiroiu, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Decentralisation in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32437-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics