Abstract
This chapter considers the relationship between science and religion and how this might impact on teaching and learning science. Whilst the teaching of scientific ideas about human origins to some student populations is recognised as a potential area of contention, there is a deeper underlying tension between different understandings of the nature of science and the worldview commitments of many of those holding religious faiths. Just as there are many religions and diverse traditions within major world religions such as Christianity and Islam, there are also different ways of understanding the nature (and in particular, the limits) of science. The core set of scientific values generally adopted by members of the scientific community is not inherently contrary to the worldviews of most learners from many religious traditions. There is more scope for conflict when science is understood to imply additional ‘scientistic’ commitments that see the supernatural as denied by science rather than – as the term itself suggests – being outside the range of application of natural science. Teaching that is perceived to be adopting such extra-scientific metaphysical commitments may be perceived as excluding students with religious beliefs regardless of whether or not they are open to considering scientific accounts of origins.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, D. R. (2008). Creation or evolution: Do we have to choose? Oxford: Monarch Books.
Alexander, D. R. (2009). After Darwin: Is intelligent design intelligent? In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 22–40). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
Allen, N. J., & Crawley, F. E. (1998). Voices from the bridge: Worldview conflicts of Kickapoo students of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 111–132. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<111::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-V.
Bachelard, G. (1940/1968). The philosophy of no: A philosophy of the scientific mind. New York: Orion Press.
Barbour, I. G. (2002). Nature, human nature, and God. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
Berkes, F. (1993). Traditional ecological knowledge in perspective. In J. T. Inglis (Ed.), Traditional ecological knowledge concepts and cases (pp. 1–9). Ottawa: International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge International Development Research Centre.
Billingsley, B., Riga, F., Taber, K. S., & Newdick, H. (2014). Secondary school teachers’ perspectives on teaching about topics that bridge science and religion. The Curriculum Journal, 25(3), 372–395. doi:10.1080/09585176.2014.920264.
Capra, F. (1975). The Tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and eastern mystcism. Berkeley: Shambhala Publications.
Cobern, W. W. (1994). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim.
Coll, R. K., Lay, M. C., & Taylor, N. (2008). Scientists and scientific thinking: Understanding scientific thinking through an investigation of scientists views about superstitions and religious beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 197–214.
Cooper, L. N. (1984). Source and limits of human intellect. Leonardo, 17(1), 40–45.
Cray, D., Dawkins, R., & Collins, F. (2006, November 5). God vs. science. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1555132,00.html.
Dagher, Z. R. (2009). Epistemology of science in curriculum standards of four Arab countries. In S. BouJaoude & Z. R. Dagher (Eds.), Arab States (Vol. 3, pp. 41–60). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Dawkins, R. (1995/2001). River out of Eden: A Darwinian view of life (Science Masters edn.). St. Helens: The Book People Lfd.
Dawkins, R. (2010, March 20). The faith trap. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/richard_dawkins/2010/03/the_faith_trap.html.
Esbenshade, D. H. (1993). Student perceptions about science & religion. The American Biology Teacher, 55(6), 334–338.
Falcão, E. B. M. (2008). Religious beliefs: Their dynamics in two groups of life scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1249–1264. doi:10.1080/09500690701765863.
Fergusson, D. (2009). Darwin and providence. In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 73–88). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
Fisher, L. (2004). Weighing the soul: The evolution of scientific beliefs. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Francis, L. J., Gibson, H. M., & Fulljames, P. (1990). Attitude towards Christianity, creationism, scientism and interest in science among 11–15 year olds. British Journal of Religious Education, 13(1), 4–17.
Freeman, M. M. R. (1992). The nature and utility of traditional ecological knowledge. Northern Perspectives, 20(1), 9–12.
Fulljames, P., & Stolberg, T. (2000). Consonance, assimilation or correlation?: Science and religion courses in higher education. Science & Christian Belief, 12(1), 35–46.
Fulljames, P., Gibson, H. M., & Francis, L. J. (1991). Creationism, scientism, Christianity and science: A study in adolescent attitudes. British Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 171–190.
Gilley, S., & Loades, A. (1981). Thomas Henry Huxley: The war between science and religion. The Journal of Religion, 61(3), 285–308.
Gould, S. J. (2001). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. London: Jonathan Cape.
Grumett, D. (2009). Natural theology after Darwin: Contemplating the vortex. In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 155–170). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
guardian.co.uk. (2008). Reiss resigns over call to discuss creationism in science lessons. Retrieved April 14, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/sep/16/michael.reiss.resignation.
Habgood, J. (2002). The concept of nature. London: Darton, Longman and Todd Ltd.
Halloway, A. ( 2008, September 23). Reiss resigns as Royal Society stifles debate on evolution. Retrieved March 27, 2013, from http://creation.com/reiss-resigns-as-royal-society-stifles-debate-on-evolution.
Hansson, L., & Redfors, A. (2007). Physics and the possibility of a religious view of the universe: Swedish upper secondary students’ views. Science & Education, 16(3–5), 461–478. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9036-8.
Hewitt, D. (2000). A clash of worldviews: Experiences from teaching aboriginal students. Theory Into Practice, 39(2), 111–117. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3902_8.
Humphreys, C. (2004). Can scientists beleive in miracles? (Lecture). Cambridge: Faraday Institute. http://www.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/faraday/Multimedia.php
Inglis, J. T. (1993). Traditional ecological knowledge concepts and cases. Ottawa: International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge International Development Research Centre.
Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.
McCalla, A. (2006). The creationist debate: The encounter between the bible and the historical mind. London: Continuum.
Moreland, J. P., & Reynolds, J. M. (1999). Introduction. In J. P. Moreland & J. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Three views on creation and evolution. Grand Rapids: Zonderzan.
Morris, B. (2006). Religion and anthropology: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pesic, P. (2006). Isaac Newton and the mystery of the major sixth: a transcription of his manuscript ‘Of Musick’ with commentary. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 31, 291–306. doi:10.1179/030801806x143268.
Popper, K. R. (1934/1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Reiss, M. J. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 157–186. doi:10.1080/03057260802264214.
Reiss, M. J. (2009). Imagining the world: The significance of religious worldviews for science education. Science & Education, 18(6), 783–796. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9091-9.
Sadler, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (Vol. 39). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sagan, C. (1985/2006). The varieties of scientific experience: A personal view of the search for God. New York: Penguin Books.
Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2013a). Conceptual frameworks, metaphysical commitments and worldviews: The challenge of reflecting the relationships between science and religion in science education. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Theory and practice (pp. 151–177). Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2013b). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011a). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000–1025. doi:10.1002/sce.20459.
Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011b). To what extent do pupils perceive science to be inconsistent with religious faith? An exploratory survey of 13–14 year-old English pupils. Science Education International, 22(2), 99–118.
Thagard, P. (2008). Conceptual change in the history of science: Life, mind, and disease. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 374–387). New York: Routledge.
Vallely, P. (2008, October 11). Religion vs science: Can the divide between God and rationality be reconciled? The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/religion-vs-science-can-the-divide-between-god-and-rationality-be-reconciled-955321.html.
Westfall, R. S. (1971). The construction of modern science: Mechanisms and mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taber, K.S. (2017). The Relationship Between Science and Religion: A Contentious and Complex Issue Facing Science Education. In: Akpan, B. (eds) Science Education: A Global Perspective . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32350-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32351-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)