Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Science and Religion: A Contentious and Complex Issue Facing Science Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science Education: A Global Perspective

Abstract

This chapter considers the relationship between science and religion and how this might impact on teaching and learning science. Whilst the teaching of scientific ideas about human origins to some student populations is recognised as a potential area of contention, there is a deeper underlying tension between different understandings of the nature of science and the worldview commitments of many of those holding religious faiths. Just as there are many religions and diverse traditions within major world religions such as Christianity and Islam, there are also different ways of understanding the nature (and in particular, the limits) of science. The core set of scientific values generally adopted by members of the scientific community is not inherently contrary to the worldviews of most learners from many religious traditions. There is more scope for conflict when science is understood to imply additional ‘scientistic’ commitments that see the supernatural as denied by science rather than – as the term itself suggests – being outside the range of application of natural science. Teaching that is perceived to be adopting such extra-scientific metaphysical commitments may be perceived as excluding students with religious beliefs regardless of whether or not they are open to considering scientific accounts of origins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, D. R. (2008). Creation or evolution: Do we have to choose? Oxford: Monarch Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. R. (2009). After Darwin: Is intelligent design intelligent? In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 22–40). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. J., & Crawley, F. E. (1998). Voices from the bridge: Worldview conflicts of Kickapoo students of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 111–132. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<111::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-V.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. (1940/1968). The philosophy of no: A philosophy of the scientific mind. New York: Orion Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, I. G. (2002). Nature, human nature, and God. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (1993). Traditional ecological knowledge in perspective. In J. T. Inglis (Ed.), Traditional ecological knowledge concepts and cases (pp. 1–9). Ottawa: International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, B., Riga, F., Taber, K. S., & Newdick, H. (2014). Secondary school teachers’ perspectives on teaching about topics that bridge science and religion. The Curriculum Journal, 25(3), 372–395. doi:10.1080/09585176.2014.920264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1975). The Tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and eastern mystcism. Berkeley: Shambhala Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W. (1994). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. K., Lay, M. C., & Taylor, N. (2008). Scientists and scientific thinking: Understanding scientific thinking through an investigation of scientists views about superstitions and religious beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. N. (1984). Source and limits of human intellect. Leonardo, 17(1), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cray, D., Dawkins, R., & Collins, F. (2006, November 5). God vs. science. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1555132,00.html.

  • Dagher, Z. R. (2009). Epistemology of science in curriculum standards of four Arab countries. In S. BouJaoude & Z. R. Dagher (Eds.), Arab States (Vol. 3, pp. 41–60). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1995/2001). River out of Eden: A Darwinian view of life (Science Masters edn.). St. Helens: The Book People Lfd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (2010, March 20). The faith trap. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/richard_dawkins/2010/03/the_faith_trap.html.

  • Esbenshade, D. H. (1993). Student perceptions about science & religion. The American Biology Teacher, 55(6), 334–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcão, E. B. M. (2008). Religious beliefs: Their dynamics in two groups of life scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1249–1264. doi:10.1080/09500690701765863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D. (2009). Darwin and providence. In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 73–88). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, L. (2004). Weighing the soul: The evolution of scientific beliefs. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., Gibson, H. M., & Fulljames, P. (1990). Attitude towards Christianity, creationism, scientism and interest in science among 11–15 year olds. British Journal of Religious Education, 13(1), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. M. R. (1992). The nature and utility of traditional ecological knowledge. Northern Perspectives, 20(1), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulljames, P., & Stolberg, T. (2000). Consonance, assimilation or correlation?: Science and religion courses in higher education. Science & Christian Belief, 12(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulljames, P., Gibson, H. M., & Francis, L. J. (1991). Creationism, scientism, Christianity and science: A study in adolescent attitudes. British Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, S., & Loades, A. (1981). Thomas Henry Huxley: The war between science and religion. The Journal of Religion, 61(3), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (2001). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumett, D. (2009). Natural theology after Darwin: Contemplating the vortex. In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 155–170). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.

    Google Scholar 

  • guardian.co.uk. (2008). Reiss resigns over call to discuss creationism in science lessons. Retrieved April 14, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/sep/16/michael.reiss.resignation.

  • Habgood, J. (2002). The concept of nature. London: Darton, Longman and Todd Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloway, A. ( 2008, September 23). Reiss resigns as Royal Society stifles debate on evolution. Retrieved March 27, 2013, from http://creation.com/reiss-resigns-as-royal-society-stifles-debate-on-evolution.

  • Hansson, L., & Redfors, A. (2007). Physics and the possibility of a religious view of the universe: Swedish upper secondary students’ views. Science & Education, 16(3–5), 461–478. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9036-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, D. (2000). A clash of worldviews: Experiences from teaching aboriginal students. Theory Into Practice, 39(2), 111–117. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3902_8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, C. (2004). Can scientists beleive in miracles? (Lecture). Cambridge: Faraday Institute. http://www.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/faraday/Multimedia.php

  • Inglis, J. T. (1993). Traditional ecological knowledge concepts and cases. Ottawa: International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, A. (2006). The creationist debate: The encounter between the bible and the historical mind. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J. P., & Reynolds, J. M. (1999). Introduction. In J. P. Moreland & J. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Three views on creation and evolution. Grand Rapids: Zonderzan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, B. (2006). Religion and anthropology: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesic, P. (2006). Isaac Newton and the mystery of the major sixth: a transcription of his manuscript ‘Of Musick’ with commentary. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 31, 291–306. doi:10.1179/030801806x143268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1934/1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 157–186. doi:10.1080/03057260802264214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2009). Imagining the world: The significance of religious worldviews for science education. Science & Education, 18(6), 783–796. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9091-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (Vol. 39). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, C. (1985/2006). The varieties of scientific experience: A personal view of the search for God. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2013a). Conceptual frameworks, metaphysical commitments and worldviews: The challenge of reflecting the relationships between science and religion in science education. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Theory and practice (pp. 151–177). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2013b). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011a). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000–1025. doi:10.1002/sce.20459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011b). To what extent do pupils perceive science to be inconsistent with religious faith? An exploratory survey of 13–14 year-old English pupils. Science Education International, 22(2), 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (2008). Conceptual change in the history of science: Life, mind, and disease. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 374–387). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallely, P. (2008, October 11). Religion vs science: Can the divide between God and rationality be reconciled? The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/religion-vs-science-can-the-divide-between-god-and-rationality-be-reconciled-955321.html.

  • Westfall, R. S. (1971). The construction of modern science: Mechanisms and mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith S. Taber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taber, K.S. (2017). The Relationship Between Science and Religion: A Contentious and Complex Issue Facing Science Education. In: Akpan, B. (eds) Science Education: A Global Perspective . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32350-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32351-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics