Abstract
Aligned with the new trends in curriculum studies, the Portuguese physical and natural sciences curriculum of basic education was reorganised by introducing several new ideas and principles, such as the notion of competence, the development of adequate learning experiences, an emphasis on formative assessment of students and the idea of flexible management of the curriculum. In order to promote changes in teachers’ practices and conceptions, the reorganisation of the curriculum involved a complex process of implementation. However, this process of curriculum change was stopped abruptly due to a change in government. This chapter’s goals are to describe the process of curriculum change, how teachers interpret and implement the science curriculum and the factors that affect the way the curriculum is implemented. We analysed data from three types of studies: (a) a nationwide study focused on teachers’ perspectives regarding the science curriculum, (b) a meta-analysis of several comprehensive Portuguese studies and (c) a multiple case study involving five schools. Results show that teachers modified certain practices not according to the original intentions of the curriculum, but according to how they perceived and experienced some of the constraints and their educational and school contexts. These results support the idea that it is essential to create structures capable of responding to the emerging training needs of teachers. The creation of communities of practice involving educational researchers and teachers may facilitate discussion and reflection about the curriculum, providing teachers with resources to accomplish innovations and for providing them with feedback about the work they are developing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abelha, M. C. (2005). Cultura Docente ao nível do Departamento Curricular das Ciências: um estudo de caso. Tese de dissertação de mestrado Departamento de Ciências da Educação. Departamento de Didáctica e Tecnologia Educativa. Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro.
Abelha, M. (2011). Trabalho colaborativo docente na gestão do currículo do Ensino Básico: do discurso às práticas. Tese de Doutoramento em Didática, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro.
Abrantes, P. (2001). Reorganização curricular do Ensino Básico: Princípios, medidas e implicações. Lisboa: Departamento do Ensino Básico. Ministério da Educação.
Alonso, L. (2005). Reorganização curricular do ensino básico; potencialidades e implicações de uma abordagem por competência. Actas do 1° encontro de educadores de infância e professores do 1° ciclo do ensino básico (pp. 15–29). Porto: Porto Areal editores.
Altrichter, H. (2005). Curriculum implementation: Limiting and facilitating factors. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Eds.), Context based learning of science (pp. 35–62). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
AMA. (2010). Critical skills survey. Retrieved in 29 March, 2013, from, http://www.amanet.org/news/AMA-2010-critical-skills-survey.aspx
Autio, O., Kaivola, T., & Lavonen, J. (2007). Context-based approach in teaching science and technology. In E. Pehkonen, M. Ahtee, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), How Finns learn mathematics and science (pp. 202–214). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Black, P., & William, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–75.
Black, P., & William, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 39–148.
Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 291–318.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.
Connelly, M., & Clandinin, J. (1986). On narrative method, personal philosophy, and the story of teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(4), 293–310.
Corbun, C. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211–244.
Correia, M. (2006). Concepções e práticas de avaliação de professores de Ciências F/Q do EB. Tese de dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa.
Crozier, M. (1982). Mudança individual e mudança colectiva. In R. KnoKe & E. Figueiredo (Eds.), Mudança Social e Psicologia Social (pp. 69–81). Lisboa: Horizonte.
Departamento da Educação Básica [DEB]. (2001a). Currículo Nacional do Ensino Básico – Competências Essenciais. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Departamento da Educação Básica [DEB]. (2001b). Ciências Físicas e Naturais – Orientações curriculares para o 3° ciclo do Ensino Básico. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Departamento de Educação Básica [DEB]. (1999). Gestão flexível do currículo. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.
Enriquez, E. (1972). Problématique du changement. Connexions, 4, 3–45.
European Commission, & High Level Group on Science Education. (2007). Science education NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe (EUR 22845). Brussels: DG Research.
European Parliament and Council (EP&C). (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, L 394, 10–18.
European Union [EU]. (2004). Europe needs more scientists. Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. Brussels: European Union [EU].
Ferreira, A. M. (2006). A co-docência na área das ciências Físicas e Naturais: um estudo de caso. Tese de dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro.
Formosinho, J., & Machado, J. (1998). Autonomia e Gestão das Escolas. Virtualidades e Contradições de um Compromisso Político. Braga: Universidade do Minho.
Fullan, M. (2008). Curriculum implementation and sustainability. In M. Connelly, M. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), Handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 113–123). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Galvão, C., & Freire, A. (2004). A perspectiva CTS no currículo das ciências físicas e naturais em Portugal. In I. Martins, F. Paixão, & R. Vieira (Eds.), Perspectivas Ciência-Tecnologia-Sociedade na inovação da educação em ciência. Actas III Seminário Ibérico CTS no Ensino das Ciências (pp. 31–38). Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro.
Galvão, C., & Lopes, A. (2002). Os projectos curriculares de turma no contexto da Gestão Flexível do Currículo. In Gestão flexível do currículo – reflexões de formadores e de investigadores (pp. 97–115). Lisboa: Ministério da Educação, Departamento da Educação Básica.
Galvão, C., Freire, A., Lopes, A., Neves, M., Oliveira, T., & Santos, M. C. (2004). Innovation in Portuguese science curriculum: Some evaluation issues. In ME (Ed.), Flexibility in curriculum, citizenship and communication/Flexibilidade curricular, cidadania e comunicação (pp. 341–357). Lisboa: Ministério da Educação, Departamento da Educação Básica.
Galvão, C., Reis, P., Freire, A., & Oliveira, T. (2007). Science curriculum in Portugal: From the development to the evaluation of students’ competences. In D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, & S. Schanze (Eds.), Making it comparable. Standards in science education (pp. 237–253). Münster: Waxmann.
Galvão, C., Reis, P., Freire, S., & Almeida, P. (2011a). Enhancing the popularity and the relevance of science teaching in Portuguese science classes. Research in Science Education, 41(5), 651–666.
Galvão, C., Reis, P., Freire, S., & Faria, C. (2011b). Ensinar ciências, aprender ciências. Porto: Porto Editora, IE.
Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Stoel, R., & Krueger, M. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406–427.
Júlio, V. N. (2006). Actividades investigativas no ensino das ciências. Tese de dissertação de mestrado. Lisboa: Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Luttenberg, J., van Veen, K., & Imants, J. (2013). Looking for cohesion: The role of search for meaning in the interaction between teacher and reform. Research Papers in Education, 28(3), 289–308.
Martins, I. (2012). O currículo das Ciências Físicas e Naturais na perspetiva docente, Saberes profissionais e possibilidades de acção. Tese de dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro.
Negrais, M. J. (2007). Percepções dos professores de ciências naturais cobre o ensino no âmbito CTSA. Tese de dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro.
OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competences for tomorrow’s world, volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009, results: Executive summary. Paris: OCDE Publishing.
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
Perrenoud, P. (1997). Construire des compétences dès L’école. Paris: ESF éditeur.
Raposo, P. (2006). Concepções sobre avaliação das aprendizagens – um estudo com professores de FQ. Tese de dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa.
Roldão, M. C. (1999). Os professores e a gestão do currículo. Perspectivas e práticas em análise. Porto: Porto Editora.
Runhaar, P., Sanders, K., & Yang, H. (2010). Stimulating teachers’ reflection and feedback asking: An interplay of self-efficacy, learning goal orientation, and transformational leadership. Teachingand Teacher Education, 26, 1154–1161.
Sítima, M. A. (2005). Implementar colaborativamente o currículo de ciências físicas e naturais. Tese de dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa.
Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum innovation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402–435). New York: Macmillan.
Spillane, J. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143–175.
UNESCO-ICSU. (1999). Declaração sobre a Ciência e o uso do saber científico. Paris: UNESCO.
Viana, P. (2003). Perspectivas dos professores relativamente ao ensino de Física e Química preconizado pelas orientações curriculares para as ciências físicas e naturais. Tese de dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa.
Acknowledgements
Part of this study was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia as part of the Project “Evaluation of the Physics and Natural Sciences Curriculum, third cycle of Basic Education” (PTDC/CPE-CED/102789/2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galvão, C., Faria, C., Freire, S., Baptista, M. (2017). Curriculum Conception, Implementation and Evaluation: An Experience. In: Akpan, B. (eds) Science Education: A Global Perspective . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32350-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32351-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)