Skip to main content

Protecting Soil Biodiversity and Soil Functions: Current Status and Future Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biodiversity and Education for Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Living soils are fundamental for human life as we know it. The top layer of Earth’s crust, essentially composed of minerals, water and air, harbours an immense variety of organisms, from plants to microorganisms, which qualifies it as a living system. Soil biodiversity is the main actor underlying the provision of services that are essential for regulating, providing and supporting human life. The increasing level of human activity has been subjecting soil to multiple pressures, resulting in soil degradation and biodiversity decline, hence deterioration in the system’s capability to render those ecosystem services. Growing concern on this resource’s misuse has led to a series of conventions and strategies targeting its conservation (such as the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection in the European Union (EC) 2006) and advocating for specific protection measures that can ensure a sustainable use of soil. These measures mainly focus on extending our knowledge on how soil functions but also on developing monitoring programmes that can detect trends and changes in soil biodiversity. This demand boosted research on soil ecology over the last decades, with significant increases of scientific knowledge on its structural and functioning complexity. However, there are still some gaps and needs to be addressed in order to design adequate measures for soil protection. In this chapter we review the main advances in soil ecological research and monitoring and further discuss the status of current strategies towards soil protection and sustainability. Moreover, we present here a strategy, consisting of three action lines, for effectively contributing to soil protection. It is based on monitoring and mapping, experimentation and raising awareness towards soil issues, which hopefully can change the way we perceive and use soil, this very dynamic but non-renewable resource at the human life time scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrouays, D., Jolivet, C., Boulonne, L., Bodineau, G., Saby, N., & Grolleau, E. (2002). Une initiative nouvelle en France: La mise en place d’un réseau institutionnel de mesure de la qualité des sols (RMQS). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie d’Agriculture de France, 88(5), 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. H., Thumlert, T. A., Meisel, L. S., Carter, P. J., & Kilpin, G. P. (1997). “Earthworms Downunder”: A survey of the earthworm fauna of urban and agricultural soils in Australia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29(3–4), 589–597. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00184-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandow, C., Ng, E. L., Schmelz, R. M., Sousa, J. P., & Römbke, J. (2016). A TME study with the fungicide pyrimethanil combined with different moisture regimes: Effects on enchytraeids. Ecotoxicology, 25(1), 213–224. doi:10.1007/s10646-015-1581-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Banwart, S. (2011). Save our soils. Nature, 474(7350), 151–152. doi:10.1038/474151a

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett, R. D., & van der Putten, W. H. (2014). Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature, 515(7528), 505–511. doi:10.1038/nature13855

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., Römbke, J., Breure, A. M., & Mulder, C. (2005). Considerations for the use of soil ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62(2 SPEC. ISS.), 189–200. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.024

    Google Scholar 

  • Bispo, A., Cluzeau, D., Creamer, R., Dombos, M., Graefe, U., Krogh, P., et al. (2009). Indicators for monitoring soil biodiversity. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5(4), 717. doi:10.1897/IEAM-2009-064.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, H. I., Parekh, N., Chaplow, J., Monson, F., Watkins, J., Creamer, R., et al. (2003). Assessing soil biodiversity across Great Britain: National trends in the occurrence of heterotrophic bacteria and invertebrates in soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 67(3), 255–266. doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00178-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Breure, A. M., & Römbke, J. (2005). The ecological classification and assessment of soils. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62(2), 185–186. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.022

    Google Scholar 

  • Brussaard, L. (2012). Ecosystem Services Provided by the Soil Biota. In D. H. Wall, R. D. Bardgett, V. Behan-Pelletier, J. E. Herrick, T. H. Jones, K. Ritz, et al. (Eds.), Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services (pp. 45–58). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, U., Russell, D. J., Decker, P., Döhler, M., Höfer, H., Lesch, S., et al. (2014). The Edaphobase project of GBIF-Germany—A new online soil-zoological data warehouse. Applied Soil Ecology, 83, 3–12. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.03.021

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. COM(2006) 232 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creamer, R. E., Hannula, S. E., Leeuwen, J. P. V., Stone, D., Rutgers, M., Schmelz, R. M., et al. (2015). Ecological network analysis reveals the inter-connection between soil biodiversity and ecosystem function as affected by land use across Europe. Applied Soil Ecology, 97, 112–124. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.006

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bello, F., Lavorel, S., Díaz, S., Harrington, R., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Bardgett, R. D., et al. (2010). Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(10), 2873–2893. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Decaëns, T., Jiménez, J. J., Gioia, C., Measey, G. J., & Lavelle, P. (2006). The values of soil animals for conservation biology. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42(suppl. 1), S23–S38. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominati, E., Patterson, M., & Mackay, A. (2010). A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1858–1868. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2006). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. COM(2006)231 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. COM(2011) 571 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). LIFE and soil protection. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2779/64447

  • European Environment Agency. (2007). Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010: Proposal for a first set of indicators to monitor progress in Europe. EEA Technical Report 11/2007. Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa, http://reports.eea.europa.eu/technical_report_2007_11/en/

  • Faber, J. H., Creamer, R. E., Mulder, C., Römbke, J., Rutgers, M., Sousa, J. P., et al. (2013). The practicalities and pitfalls of establishing a policy-relevant and cost-effective soil biological monitoring scheme. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 9(2), 276–284. doi:10.1002/ieam.1398

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardi, C., Montanarella, L., Arrouays, D., Bispo, A., Lemanceau, P., Jolivet, C., et al. (2009). Soil biodiversity monitoring in Europe: Ongoing activities and challenges. European Journal of Soil Science, 60(5), 807–819. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01177.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartemink, A. E. (2008). Soils are back on the global agenda. Soil Use and Management, 24(4), 327–330. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00187.x

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2015). Soil quality—vocabulary. ISO 11074:2015. Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, S., Gardi, C., Jones, A., Montanarella, L., Marmo, L., Miko, L., et al. (2010). European Atlas of Soil Biodiversity. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2788/94222

  • Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J., Doran, J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F., & Schuman, G. E. (1997). Soil quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation (A Guest Editorial). Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61(1), 4. doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010001x

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morvan, X., Saby, N. P. A., Arrouays, D., Le Bas, C., Jones, R. J. A., Verheijen, F. G. A., et al. (2008). Soil monitoring in Europe: A review of existing systems and requirements for harmonisation. Science of The Total Environment, 391(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.046

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä, J. (2000). Biodiversity monitoring for decision-making. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 37(December), 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgiazzi, A., Panagos, P., Yigini, Y., Dunbar, M. B., Gardi, C., Montanarella, L., et al. (2016). A knowledge-based approach to estimating the magnitude and spatial patterns of potential threats to soil biodiversity. Science of The Total Environment, 545–546, 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.092

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, V., Menta, C., Gardi, C., Jacomini, C., & Mozzanica, E. (2005). Microarthropod communities as a tool to assess soil quality and biodiversity: A new approach in Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 105(1–2), 323–333. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.02.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, U., Termansen, M., Hedlund, K., Brussaard, L., Faber, J. H., Foudi, S., et al. (2015). On the value of soil biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 15, 11–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.06.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulleman, M., Creamer, R., Hamer, U., Helder, J., Pelosi, C., Pérès, G., et al. (2012). Soil biodiversity, biological indicators and soil ecosystem services—An overview of European approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(5), 529–538. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.009

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, F., Carvalho, F., Martins da Silva, P., Mendes, S., Santos, S. A. P., & Sousa, J. P. (2016). The use of a functional approach as surrogate of Collembola species richness in European perennial crops and forests. Ecological Indicators, 61, 676–682. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.019

    Google Scholar 

  • Römbke, J., Breure, A. M., Mulder, C., & Rutgers, M. (2005). Legislation and ecological quality assessment of soil: Implementation of ecological indication systems in Europe. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62(2), 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.023

    Google Scholar 

  • Römbke, J., Gardi, C., Creamer, R., & Miko, L. (2016). Soil biodiversity data: Actual and potential use in European and national legislation. Applied Soil Ecology, 97, 125–133. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, A., Beck, L., Dreher, P., Hund-Rinke, K., Römbke, J., & Spelda, J. (2003). A biological classification concept for the assessment of soil quality: “biological soil classification scheme” (BBSK). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 98(1–3), 263–271. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00086-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, N., Jérôme, M., Léonide, C., Christine, R., Hommay, G., Etienne, I., et al. (2011). IBQS: A synthetic index of soil quality based on soil macro-invertebrate communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(10), 2032–2045. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.019

  • Rutgers, M., Schouten, A. J., Bloem, J., van Eekeren, N., de Goede, R. G. M., Jagersop Akkerhuis, G. A. J. M., et al. (2009). Biological measurements in a nationwide soil monitoring network. European Journal of Soil Science, 60(5), 820–832. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01163.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, A., van den Brink, P. J., Heimbach, F., Hoy, S. P., de Jong, F. M. W., Römbke, J., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Guidance from the SETAC Europe Workshop: Semi-field methods for the environmental risk assessment of pesticides in soil (PERAS). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, J. P., da Silva, P. M., Feld, C. K., de Bello, F., Feio, M. J., Grandin, U., et al. (2009). Web report comparing indicator systems targeting deviation from undisturbed areas and disturbance gradients. Retrieved from http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODE_Report_on_Indicators_of_Disturbance.pdf

  • Stone, D., Blomkvist, P., Hendriksen, N. B., Bonkowski, M., Jørgensen, H. B., Carvalho, F., et al. (2016). A method of establishing a transect for biodiversity and ecosystem function monitoring across Europe. Applied Soil Ecology, 97, 3–11. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.017

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D., Ritz, K., Griffiths, B. G., Orgiazzi, A., & Creamer, R. E. (2016). Selection of biological indicators appropriate for European soil monitoring. Applied Soil Ecology, 97, 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Turbé, A., De Toni, A., Benito, P., Lavelle, P., Lavelle, P., Ruiz, N., et al. (2010). Soil biodiversity: Functions, threats and tools for policy makers. Bio Intelligence Service, IRD, and NIOO, Report for European Commission (DG Environment). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/soil/pdf/biodiversity_report.pdf

  • United Nations. (1992). Convention on biological diversity. Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf

  • United Nations. (1994). United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa. Retrieved from http://www.unccd.int/Lists/SiteDocumentLibrary/Publications/UNCCD_Convention_ENG.pdf

  • United Nations. (2014). General Assembly Resolution 68/232. World Soil Day and International Year of Soils, A/RES/68/232 (20 December 2013). Retrieved from undocs.org/A/RES/68/232

  • Vandewalle, M., de Bello, F., Berg, M. P., Bolger, T., Dolédec, S., Dubs, F., et al. (2010). Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and organisms. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(10), 2921–2947. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9798-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, E., Lavelle, P., & Andrade, M. (2007). GISQ, a multifunctional indicator of soil quality. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39(12), 3066–3080. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.06.013

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. H., Nielsen, U. N., & Six, J. (2015). Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature, 1–8. doi:10.1038/nature15744

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurst, S., De Deyn, G. B., & Orwin, K. (2012). Soil Biodiversity and Functions. In D. H. Wall, R. D. Bardgett, V. Behan-Pelletier, J. E. Herrick, T. H. Jones, K. Ritz, et al. (Eds.), Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services (pp. 28–44). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Mendes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mendes, S., Azul, A.M., Castro, P., Römbke, J., Sousa, J.P. (2016). Protecting Soil Biodiversity and Soil Functions: Current Status and Future Challenges. In: Castro, P., Azeiteiro, U., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Leal Filho, W., Azul, A. (eds) Biodiversity and Education for Sustainable Development . World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32318-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics