Skip to main content

Choosing Geometric Dissimilarity Measure for Content Based Coral Reefs Image Retrieval

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Machine Learning and Signal Processing

Abstract

The dissimilarity measure used by a Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) system significantly affects its performance. Choosing the right dissimilarity measure is important especially when we have large low-level features to represent each image in the database. This paper presents the performance of various geometric distance measures for retrieval of images from a coral reefs database that consists of three groups of coral. Based on the results obtained by Precision-Recall graphs, there is no single distance measure that best for all queries. Therefore, Mean Average Precision is used to measure the overall performance, and the results showed that the top three best geometric distance measures for retrieving images from a coral database are the Squared Chord, City Block, and Canberra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rodman James E, Cody Jeannine H (2003) The taxonomic impediment overcome: NSF’s partnerships for enhancing expertise in taxonomy (PEET) as a model. Syst Biol 52(3):428–435

    Google Scholar 

  2. Datta R, Joshi D, Li J, Wang JZ (2008) Image retrieval: ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 40(2):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Faria AV, Oishi K, Yoshida S, Hillis A, Miller MI, Mori S (2015) Content-based image retrieval for brain MRI: an image-searching engine and population-based analysis to utilize past clinical data for future diagnosis. NeuroImage Clin 7:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiji GW, DuraiRaj PJ (2015) Content-based image retrieval techniques for the analysis of dermatological lesions using particle swarm optimization technique. Appl Soft Comput 30:650–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iqbal K, Odetayo MO, James A (2012) Content-based image retrieval approach for biometric security using colour, texture and shape features controlled by fuzzy heuristics. J Comput Syst Sci 78(4):1258–1277

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou J, Abdel-Mottaleb M (2005) A content-based system for human identification based on bitewing dental X-ray images. Pattern Recogn 38(11):2132–2142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang D, Lu G (2003) Evaluation of similarity measurement for image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on neural networks and signal processing, vol 2. IEEE, pp 928–931

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu R, Ruger S, Song D, Liu H, Huang Z (2008) Image retrieval: ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Comp Surv 40(2):5:1–5:60

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haiming L, Dawei S, Rüger S, Hu R, Uren V (2008) Comparing dissimilarity measures for content-based image retrieval. ACM Comp Surv 40(2):5:1–5:60

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cho HC, Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Helvie M, Paramagul C, Nees AV (2011) Similarity evaluation in a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) CADx system for characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images. Med Phys 38(4):1820–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins J, Okada K (2012) A comparative study of similarity measures for content-based medical image retrieval. In: CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marcos MSA, Soriano M, Saloma C (2007) Low-level color and texture feature extraction of coral reef components. Sci Diliman 15(1)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rubner Y, Puzicha J, Tomasi C, Buhmann JM (2001) Empirical evaluation of dissimilarity measures for color and texture. Comput Vis Image Underst 84(1):25–43

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang J, Zabih R (1998) Combining color and spatial information for content-based image retrieval. In: Proceedings of ECDL

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stricker MA, Orengo M (1995) Similarity of color images. In: IS&T/SPIE’s symposium on electronic imaging: science and technology. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 381–392

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee TS (1996) Image representation using 2D Gabor wavelets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 18(10):959–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai SJS (2002) Power transformer partial discharge (PD) acoustic signal detection using fiber sensors and wavelet analysis, modeling, and simulation. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Institute of Oceonography and Environment (INOS) for kindly sharing the coral reefs images.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan Nural Jawahir Hj Wan Yussof .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hj Wan Yussof, W.N.J., Hitam, M.S., Awalludin, E.A., Bachok, Z. (2016). Choosing Geometric Dissimilarity Measure for Content Based Coral Reefs Image Retrieval. In: Soh, P., Woo, W., Sulaiman, H., Othman, M., Saat, M. (eds) Advances in Machine Learning and Signal Processing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32213-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32213-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32212-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32213-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics