Skip to main content

How States Build Sustainable Energy Capacity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governing Sustainable Energies in China

Part of the book series: Politics and Development of Contemporary China ((PDCC))

  • 298 Accesses

Abstract

Mitigating the effects of man-made global warming entails reshaping the sectorial structure, changing consumer culture, accelerating technological innovation, and raising public environmental awareness; and, most importantly, the task requires substantial political support for policy leaders so that they may secure immediate, feasible mitigation resolutions to implement long-term climate strategies. Such political support has been considered as needing to be formulated on the basis of a democratic decision-making process in which widening public participation is assumed non-negotiable if legitimately secure agreements are to be reached among various stakeholders to tackle environmentally sensitive problems (OECD 2002; Bulkeley and Mol 2003; Stevenson and Dryzek 2014). As part of climate mitigation strategies, the development of sustainable energy has occurred under a universal cognition that is profoundly dependent on democratic political support. The strategy that has been implemented thus far in many industrial countries has been established through a mode of governance that explicitly requires the strengthening of local public participation; otherwise, it is deemed impossible to contribute accountably to improving environmental policy outcomes (Van Tatenhove and Leroy 2003; Few et al. 2007; Andrews-Speed 2012; Devine-Wright 2012). This assumption is also embedded in an emerging consensus regarding an environmental policy templateā€”sustainable developmentā€”that entails central government giving up power to local-level governments and creating a new partnership with non-governmental actors in the formation of environmental policies (WCED 1987; Baker 2005). This has become a dominant policy template adopted by an increasing number of states (Hajer 1997).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Andrews-Speed, P. (2012). The governance of energy in China: Transition to a low-carbon economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Amsden, A. H. (1992). Asiaā€™s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Barry, J., & Wissenburg, M. L. J. (Eds.). (2001). Sustaining liberal democracy: Ecological challenges and opportunities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baker, S. (2015). Sustainable development (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Beeson, M. (2010). The coming of environmental authoritarianism. Environmental Politics, 19(2), 276ā€“294.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). London: Pearson.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bloomberg News. (2013, December 4). China doubles pace of adding renewables amid pollution cut. Bloomberg. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-04/china-doubles-pace-of-adding-renwables-amid-pollution-cut.html

  • BlĆ¼hdorn, I. (2011). The politics of unsustainability: COP15, post-ecologism, and the ecological paradox. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 34ā€“53.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • BlĆ¼hdorn, I. (2012). International climate politics beyond the Copenhagen disaster. European Political Science, 11(1), 1ā€“6.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • BlĆ¼hdorn, I. (2013). The governance of unsustainability: Ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 16ā€“36.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bradsher, K. (2010). China leading global race to make clean energy. New York Times. Retrieved January 18, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/business/energy-environment/31renew.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

  • Breslin, S. (1995). China in the 1980ā€™s: Centre-province relations in a reforming socialist state. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Breslin, S. (2007). China and the global political economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Breslin, S. (2011b). The ā€œChina modelā€ and the global crisis: From Friedrich list to a Chinese mode of governance? International Affairs, 87(6), 1323ā€“1343.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Breslin, S. (2012). Government-industry relations in China: A review of the art of the state. In A. Walter & X. Zhang (Eds.), East Asian capitalism: Diversity, continuity, and change (pp. 29ā€“45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bulkeley, H., & Mol, A. P. J. (2003). Participation and environmental governance: Consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environmental Values, 12(2), 143ā€“154.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cunningham IV, E. A. (2010). Fueling the miracle: Chinaā€™s energy governance and reform. In J. Fewsmith (Ed.), China today, China tomorrow: Domestic politics, economy, and society (pp. 223ā€“258). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Carter, N. (2007). The politics of the environment: Ideas, activism, policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dent, C. M. (2015). Chinaā€™s renewable energy development: Policy, industry and business perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 21(1), 26ā€“43.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Devine-Wright, P. (Ed.). (2012). Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to participation. London: Routledge.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dickson, B. J. (2000). Cooptation and corporatism in China: The logic of party adaptation. Political Science Quarterly, 115(4), 517ā€“540.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Doyle, T., & Simpson, A. (2006). Traversing more than speed bumps: Green politics under authoritarian regimes in Burma and Iran. Environmental Politics, 15(5), 750ā€“767.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dryzek, J. S., & Dunleavy, P. (2009). Theories of the democratic state. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Earth Policy Institute. (2015b). Cumulative installed wind power capacity in top ten countries and the world, 1980ā€“2014. Retrieved October 26, 2015, from http://www.earth-policy.org/?/data_center/C23/

  • Economy, E. C. (2007). Great leap backward ā€“ The costs of Chinaā€™s environmental crisis. The Foreign Affairs, 86(5), 38ā€“59.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Edin, M. (2003a). State capacity and local agent control in China: CCP cadre management from a township perspective. The China Quarterly, 173, 35ā€“52.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Fewsmith, J. (2012). The logic and limits of political reform in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Friedman, T. L. (2009, September 8). Our one party democracy. New York Times, p. A29.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Few, R., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2007). Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy, 7(1), 46ā€“59.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Gallagher, K. S. (2014). The globalization of clean energy technology: Lessons from China. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • GarcĆ­a, C. (2011). Grid-connected renewable energy in China: Policies and institutions under gradualism, developmentalism, and socialism. Energy Policy, 39(12), 8046ā€“8050.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Giddens, A. (2011). The politics of climate change (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Goodman, D. S. (Ed.). (1997). Chinaā€™s provinces in reform: Class, community and political culture. London: Routledge.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Goodman, D. S. G. (2009). Sixty years of the Peopleā€™s Republic: Local perspectives on the evolution of the state in China. The Pacific Review, 22(4), 429ā€“450.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1997). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. London: Clarendon Press.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Heilmann, S. (2008). Policy experimentation in Chinaā€™s economic rise. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(1), 1ā€“26.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Heilmann, S. (2009). Maximum tinkering under uncertainty: Unorthodox lessons from China. Modern China, 35(4), 450ā€“462.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Heimer, M., & Thogersen, S. (Eds.). (2006). Doing fieldwork in China. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hildingsson, R., Stripple, J., & Jordan, A. (2012). Governing renewable energy in the EU: Confronting a governance dilemma. European Political Science, 11(1), 18ā€“30.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • HanckĆ©, B. (2009). Intelligent research design: A guide for beginning researchers in the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2011). CO 2 emissions from fuel combustion 2011. Paris: IEA/OECD.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Johnson, C. (1982). Miti and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925ā€“1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Landman, T. (2008). Issues and methods in comparative politics: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Landry, P. F. (2012). Decentralized authoritarianism in China: The Communist Partyā€™s control of local elites in the post-Mao era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 297ā€“325.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lewis, J. I. (2011b). Building a national wind turbine industry: Experiences from China, India and South Korea. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 5(3), 281ā€“305.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Li, J., Tsai, F., Tang, W., Xie, H., Gao, H., Ma, L., et al. (2011). China wind power outlook 2011 (Feng guang wu xian: Zhongguo feng dian fa zhan bao gao, é£Žå…‰ę— é™: äø­å›½é£Žē”µå‘å±•ęŠ„告). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press (Chinese Renewable Energy Industries Association/Greenpeace China).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lieberthal, K. G., & Oksenberg, M. (1988). Policy making in China: Leaders, structures, and processes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lin, Y. J., Tao, R., & Liu, M. (2006). Decentralization and local governance in Chinaā€™s economic transition. In P. K. Bardhan & D. Mookherjee (Eds.), Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: A comparative perspective (pp. 305ā€“327). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mathews, J. A., & Tan, H. (2014). Economics: Manufacture renewables to build energy security. Nature, 513(7517), 166ā€“168.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Methmann, C. P. (2010). ā€œClimate protectionā€ as empty signifier: A discourse theoretical perspective on climate mainstreaming in world politics. Millennium ā€“ Journal of International Studies, 39(2), 345ā€“372.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (Eds.). (2010). Theory and methods in political science. 3rd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • OECD. (2002). Governance for sustainable development: Five OECD case studies. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Oi, J. C. (1992). Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China. World Politics, 45(1), 99ā€“126.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Oi, J. C. (1995). The role of the local state in Chinaā€™s transitional economy. The China Quarterly, 144, 1132ā€“1149.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ophuls, W. (1977). Ecology and the politics of scarcity. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Paavola, J. (2007). Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 93ā€“103.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Pearson, M. M. (2007). Governing the Chinese economy: Regulatory reform in the service of the state. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 718ā€“730.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21). (2012). Renewables global status report 2012. Paris: REN21 Secretariat.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Romm, J. (2009). Tom Friedman, our one-party democracy, and the clean energy jobs message. Climateprogress.org. Retrieved May 2, 2016, from http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2009/09/09/204616/tom-friedman-clean-energy-green-jobs/

  • Saich, T. (2010). Governance and politics of China (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schreurs, M. A. (2011). Authoritarian state: The ambivalent case of China. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 449ā€“463). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Snyder, R. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 93ā€“110.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Shearman, D. J., & Smith, J. W. (2007). The climate change challenge and the failure of democracy. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sovacool, B. K. (2013). A qualitative factor analysis of renewable energy and Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL) in the Asia-Pacific. Energy Policy, 59, 393ā€“403.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Stevenson, H. (2013b). Institutionalizing unsustainability: The paradox of global climate governance. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Szarka, J. (2012). Climate challenges, ecological modernization, and technological forcing: Policy lessons from a comparative USā€“EU analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 87ā€“109.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Toke, D. (2011a). Ecological modernisation and renewable energy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Unger, J., & Chan, A. (1995). China, corporatism, and the East Asian model. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 33, 29ā€“53.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Van Tatenhove, J. P. M., & Leroy, P. (2003). Environment and participation in a context of political modernisation. Environmental Values, 12(2), 155ā€“174.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of the powerless state: Governing the economy in a global era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Weiss, L. (2000). Developmental states in transition: Adapting, dismantling, innovating, not ā€œnormalizingā€. The Pacific Review, 13(1), 21ā€“55.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Weiss, L. (2003). Guiding globalisation in East Asia: New roles for old developmental states. In L. Weiss (Ed.), States in the global economy: Bringing domestic institutions back in (pp. 245ā€“270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Westra, L. (1998). Living in integrity: A global ethic to restore a fragmented earth. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Zheng, H., De Jong, M., & Koppenjan, J. (2010). Applying policy network theory to policy-making in China: The case of urban health insurance reform. Public Administration, 88(2), 398ā€“417.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, G.Cf. (2016). How States Build Sustainable Energy Capacity. In: Governing Sustainable Energies in China. Politics and Development of Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30969-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics