Abstract
This chapter explores the significance of protein dehydron patterns as markers for molecular evolution. Since, as described in Chap. 4, dehydrons may be targeted by wrapping ligands that may eventually become therapeutic drugs, the evolutionary insights hereby obtained naturally have ramifications for the drug designer. Such ramifications will be exhaustively investigated in the remaining chapters of the book. Proteins with common ancestry (homologs) typically share a common fold, but this structural similarity introduces major problems for molecular targeted therapy since it may lead to hazardous off-target effects and prevent the control of specificity. As shown in this chapter, while the topology of the native fold is highly similar across homologs, the wrapping patterns tend to be different, enabling the wrapping drug to funnel its impact solely on clinically relevant targets. The evolutionary root of the differences in dehydron pattern across homologous proteins is dissected in this chapter both across species and within the human species. As first hinted in this chapter and further developed in the subsequent ones, wrapping variations across homologs can be exploited in drug design to considerable advantage as we aim at engineering target-specific and species-specific therapeutic agents and build meaningful animal models for disease and malignancy. In establishing the evolutionary forces that promote differences in the dehydron patterns across orthologous proteins, we discovered that random genetic drift plays an operational role in promoting dehydron enrichment. This type of structural degradation enhances the propensity for protein interactivity and becomes more pronounced in species with low population, such as humans, where the mildly deleterious mutations typically resulting from random drift have a higher probability of getting fixed in the population. The fitness consequences of this evolutionary strategy adopted by nature are assessed for humans, and reveal the high exposure of the human species to fitness catastrophes resulting from aberrant protein aggregation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fernández A, Scott R, Berry RS. The nonconserved wrapping of conserved folds reveals a trend towards increasing connectivity in proteomic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:2823–7.
Fernández A, Berry RS. Molecular dimension explored in evolution to promote proteomic complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13460–5.
Lynch M, Conery JS. The origins of genome complexity. Science. 2003;302:1401–4.
Kondrashov FA, Koonin EV. A common framework for understanding the origin of genetic dominance and evolutionary fates of gene duplications. Trends Genet. 2004;20:287–90.
Liang H, Rogale-Plazonic K, Chen J, Li WH, Fernández A. Protein under-wrapping causes dosage sensitivity and decreases gene duplicability. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e11.
Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature. 2003;424:194–7.
Fernández A, Scheraga H. Insufficiently dehydrated hydrogen bonds as determinants for protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:113–8.
Bartel D. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–33.
Fernández A, Chen J. Human capacitance to dosage imbalance: coping with inefficient selection. Genome Res. 2009;19(12):2185–92.
Fernández A. Keeping dry and crossing membranes. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1081–4.
Veitia RA. Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency. Bioessays. 2002;24:175–84.
Veitia RA. Gene dosage balance: deletions, duplications and dominance. Trends Genet. 2004;21:33–5.
Su AI, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6062–7.
Birney E, Andrews D, Caccamo M, et al. Ensembl 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D556–61.
Yang Z, Nielsen R. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:32–43.
Friedman RC, Farth KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009;19:92–105.
Lewis B, Burge C, Bartel D. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120:15–20.
Grimson A, Farth KK, Johnston WK, et al. MicroRNA target specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol Cell. 2007;27:91–105.
Aloy P, Ceulemans H, Stark A, Russell RB. The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J Mol Biol. 2003;332:989–98.
Gu Z, Nicolae D, Lu HH, Li W-H. Rapid divergence in expression between duplicate genes inferred from microarray data. Trends Genet. 2002;18:609–13.
Chen F, Li W-H. Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68:444–56.
Gao L, Innan H. Very low gene duplication rate in the yeast genome. Science. 2004;306:1367–70.
Fernández A, Lynch M. Nonadaptive origins of interactome complexity. Nature. 2011;474:502–5.
Ball P. The Achilles’ heel of biological complexity. Nature. 2011;474:502–5. doi:10.1038/news.2011.294.
Ball P. Why are you so complex? Complicated protein interactions evolved to stave off mutations. Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/complicated-protein-interactions-evolved-to-stave-off-mutations/. Accessed 18 May 2011.
Surmacz E, Bartucci M. Role of estrogen receptor alpha in modulating IGF-I receptor signaling and function in breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2005;23:385–94.
Kimura M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
Arnold FH, Meyerowitz JT. News and views: evolving with purpose. Nature. 2014;509:166–7.
Kirk D. Volvox: the molecular genetic origins of multicellularity and cellular differentiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Prochnik SE, Umen J, Nedelcu AM, Hallmann A, Miller SM, et al. Genomic analysis of organismal complexity in the multicellular gree alga Volvox carteri. Science. 2010;329:223–8.
Kirk D. A twelve-step program for evolving multicellularity and a division of labor. Bioessays. 2005;27:299–310.
Miller SM, Kirk DL. GlsA, a Volvox gene required for asymmetric division and germ cell specification, encodes a chaperone-like protein. Development. 1999;126:649–58.
King N. The unicellular ancestry of animal development. Dev Cell. 2004;7:313–25.
Herron MD, Jeremiah D, Hackett JD, Aylward FO, Michod RE. Triassic origin and early radiation of multicellular volvocine algae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:3254–8.
Cheng Q, Fowler R, Tam LW, Edwards L, Miller SM. The role of GlsA in the evolution of asymmetric cell division in the green alga Volvox carteri. Dev Genes Evol. 2003;213:328–35.
Kirk DL, Nishii I. Volvox carteri as a model for studying the genetic and cytological control of morphogenesis. Dev Growth Differ. 2001;43:621–31.
Herron MD, Michod RE. Evolution of complexity in the volvocine algae: transitions in individuality through Darwin’s eye. Evolution. 2008;62:436–51.
Nedelcu AM. Environmentally induced responses co-opted for reproductive altruism. Biol Lett. 2009;5:805–8.
Ueki N, Nishii I. Idaten is a new cold-inducible transposon of Volvox carteri that can be used for tagging developmentally important genes. Genetics. 2008;180:1343–53.
Pietrosemoli N, Crespo A, Fernández A. Dehydration propensity of order-disorder intermediate regions in soluble proteins. J Proteome Res. 2007;6:3519–26.
Fernández A, Berry RS. Golden rule for buttressing vulnerable soluble proteins. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:2643–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fernández, A. (2016). Dehydron as a Marker for Molecular Evolution: Lessons for the Drug Designer. In: Physics at the Biomolecular Interface. Soft and Biological Matter. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30852-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30852-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30851-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30852-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)