Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Health Information Technology Standards ((HITS))

  • 7153 Accesses

Abstract

Models provide a way to describe systems as they are now and how we want to change them. Formal methods reduce the probability of misunderstanding. Different types of model are needed at different parts of the project life cycle. Conceptual models differ in detail from implementation-specific models. The early stages use scope statements, storyboards and requirements specification. Examples are provided about Fred and his dog and colorectal cancer referral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Author TB was convenor of CEN TC251 WG3 (health communication and messaging) from 1991 to 1997 when the work described in this section was done.

References

  1. Coiera E. Guide to health informatics. 3rd ed. London/New York: CRC Press; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Mellor SJ, Scott K, Uhl A, Weise D. MDA distilled: principles of model-driven architecture. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Warmer J, Kleppe A. The object constraint language: getting your models ready for the MDA. 2nd ed. Boston: Addison Wesley; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tanenbaum A, Wetherall D. Computer networks. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. CEN CR 1350:1993. Investigation of syntaxes for existing interchange formats to be used in healthcare. CEN Report 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. CEN CR 12587:1996. Medical informatics – methodology for the development of healthcare messages. CEN Report 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beeler W. HL7 Version 3 – an object-oriented methodology for collaborative standards development. Int J Med Inform. 1998;48:151–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bodenheimer T, Bojestig M, Henriks G. Making systemwide improvements in health care: lessons from Jönköping County, Sweden. Qual Manag Health Care. 2007;16(1):10–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hawking M. Fred and his dog – an update. BCS Primary Health Care Group Blog December 2011. http://primaryhealthinfo.wordpress.com/2011/12/11/fred-and-his-dog-an-update/

  10. Hawking M. Fred’s saying “You just don’t GET IT”. BCS Primary Health Care Group Blog November 2013. http://primaryhealthinfo.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/freds-saying-you-just-dont-get-it/

  11. Benson T. Prevention of errors and user alienation in healthcare IT integration programmes. Inform Prim Care. 2007;15:1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Improving outcomes in colorectal cancers: manual update. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Selvachandran SN, Hodder RJ, Ballal MS, Jones P, Cade D. Prediction of colorectal cancer by a patient consultation questionnaire and scoring system: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002;360:278–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1298–306.

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Colorectal cancer: the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer. Clinical guideline. London: NICE; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benson, T., Grieve, G. (2016). Models. In: Principles of Health Interoperability. Health Information Technology Standards. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30370-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30370-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30368-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30370-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics