Skip to main content

The Health Information Revolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles of Health Interoperability

Part of the book series: Health Information Technology Standards ((HITS))

Abstract

This chapter sets out some of the core problems and opportunities facing the digital healthcare sector. Healthcare is all about communication. Large investments in digital health have failed to live up to expectations, partly due to poor interoperability. Patient centered care requires a new approach, organized primarily for patient benefit, not just for provider organizations. What matters most is the point of care, which is inevitably complex. Many lessons can be learnt from past experience, successes and failures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Topol E. The creative destruction of medicine: how the digital revolution will create better health care. New York: Basic Books; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wachter R. The digital doctor: hope, hype, and harm at the dawn of medicine’s computer age. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bleich H, Lawrence L. Weed and the problem-oriented medical record. MD Comput. 1993;10(2):70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins J. Good to great and the social services. London: Random House; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wennberg JE. Tracking medicine: a researcher’s quest to understand health care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, McGinnis JM, editors. Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McLuhan M. The gutenberg galaxy: the making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Topol E. The patient will see you now: the future of medicine is in your hands. New York: Basic Books; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ainsworth J, Buchan I. Combining health data uses to ignite health system learning. Methods Inf Med. 2015;54:479–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon H. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In: Greenberger M, editor. Computers, communication, and the public interest. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berwick D. Medical associations: guilds or leaders. BMJ. 1997;314:1564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hodge M. History of the TDS medical information system. In: Blum BI, Duncan K, editors. A history of medical informatics. New York: ACM Press; 1990. p. 328–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Coiera E. Four rules for the reinvention of healthcare. BMJ. 2004;328:1197–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Department of Health. The good practice guidelines for GP electronic patient records, vol. 4. London: Department of Health; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Benson T. Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not – Part 1: incentives. BMJ. 2002;325:1086–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Westbrook J, Ampt A, Kearney L, Rob MI. All in a day’s work: an observational study to quantify how and with whom doctors on hospital wards spend their time. MJA. 2008;188(9):506–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brennan S. The NHS IT project: the biggest computer programme in the world … Ever! Oxford: Radcliffe; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wanless D. Securing our future health: taking a long-term view. Final report. London: HM Treasury; 2002; Chapter 7 Conclusions and recommendations, p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Department of Health. Delivering 21st century IT support for the NHS: National Strategic Programme. Leeds: Department of Health; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Russell J, Potts H. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study. BMJ. 2010;340:c3111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Infoway. http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/lang-en/standards-collaborative

  23. MedCom. A Danish healthcare network in two years. Odense: Danish Centre for Health Telematics; 1996. http://www.medcom.dk/publikationer/publikationer/MedCom1-engelsk.pdf

  24. Johansen I, Henriksen G, Demkjær K, Bjerregaard Jensen H, Jørgensen L. Quality assurance and certification of health IT-systems communicating data in primary and secondary health sector. Presentation at MIE 2003, St Malo.

    Google Scholar 

  25. MedCom – IT brings the Danish health sector together. November 2008. http://www.medcom.dk/dwn2440

  26. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Daschle T. Critical: what we can do about the healthcare crisis. New York: Thomas Dunne Books; 2008. p. 35–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Physicians use of EHR systems 2014. AmericanEHR and AMA 2015. http://www.americanehr.com/research/reports/Physicians-Use-of-EHR-Systems-2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benson, T., Grieve, G. (2016). The Health Information Revolution. In: Principles of Health Interoperability. Health Information Technology Standards. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30370-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30370-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30368-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30370-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics