Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Models, Methods and Tools for Effectiveness Estimation of Post Object-Oriented Technologies in Software Maintenance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications (ICTERI 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 594))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 381 Accesses

Abstract

An intelligent framework for effectiveness estimation of post object-oriented technologies (POOT) is proposed, which is based on structuring and analyzing of domain-specific knowledge about such interconnected and complex data resources within a software maintenance process as: (1) structural complexity of legacy software systems; (2) dynamic behavior of user requirements; (3) architecture-centered implementation issues by usage of different POOT. These 3 components are formalized and combined in form of the algorithmic model, and the final estimation values of POOT effectiveness are defined using fuzzy logic method and CASE-tools elaborated, which were tested successfully at the maintenance case-study of real-life software application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. Addison Wesley, Boston (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eilam, E.: Reversing: Secrets of Reverse Engineering. Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apel, S. et al.: On the structure of crosscutting concerns: using aspects of collaboration? In: Workshop on Aspect-Oriented Product Line Engineering (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Przyby3ek, A.: Post object-oriented paradigms in software development: a comparative analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Multi-conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, pp. 1009–1020 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Official Web-site of Aspect-oriented Software Development community. http://aosd.net

  6. Official Web-site of Feature-oriented Software Development community. http://fosd.de

  7. Official Web-site of Context-oriented Software Development group. http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/hirschfeld/cop/events

  8. Highsmith, J.: Agile Project Management. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gamma, E., et al.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheldon, T., Jerath, K., Chung, H.: Metrics for maintainability of class inheritance hierarchies. J. Softw. Maintenance Evol. 14, 1–14 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison, R., Counsell, S.J.: The role of inheritance in the maintainability of object-oriented systems. In: Proceedings of ESCOM 1998, pp. 449–457 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aversano, L., Cerulo, L., Di Penta, M.: Relating the evolution of design patterns and crosscutting concerns. In: Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, pp. 180–192 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hannemann, J., Kiczales, G.: Design pattern implementation in java and aspectJ. In: Proceedings of OOPSLA 2002, pp. 161–173 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eaddy, M., et al.: Identifying, assigning, and quantifying crosscutting concerns. In: Workshop on Assessment of Contemporary Modularization Techniques (ACoMT 2007), Minneapolis, USA, pp. 212–217 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Filman, R., Elrad, S., Aksit, M.: Aspect-Oriented Software Development. Addison Wesley Professional, Reading (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Figueiredo, E.: Concern-Oriented Heuristic Assessment of Design Stability. Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Official Web-site of MSDN. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee658105.aspx

  18. Clarket, S., et al.: Separating concerns throughout the development lifecycle. In: International Workshop on Aspect-Oriented Programming ECOOP (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Apel, S.: The role of features and aspects in software development. Ph.D. thesis, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tkachuk, M., Nagornyi, K.: Towards effectiveness estimation of post object-oriented technologies in software maintenance. J. Prob. Program. 2-3(special issue), 252–260 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taromirad M., Paige, M.: Agile requirements traceability using domain-specific modeling languages. In: Extreme Modeling Workshop, pp. 45–50 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eaddy, M., et al.: Do crosscutting concerns cause defects? IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 34(4), 497–515 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aversano, L., et al.: Relationship between design patterns defects and crosscutting concern scattering degree. IET Softw. 3(5), 395–409 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker, R., Rawal, S., Sillito, J.: Do crosscutting concerns cause modularity problems? In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (SIGSOFT/FSE 2012), pp. 1–11 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gottardi, T., et al.: Model-based reuse for crosscutting frameworks: assessing reuse and maintenance effort. J. Softw. Eng. Res. Dev. 1, 1–34 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tarr, P.L., et al.: N degrees of separation: multi-dimensional separation of concerns. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 107–119. ACM, Los Angeles (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Official Web-site of System Thinking World community. http://www.systems-thinking.org/kmgmt/kmgmt.htm

  28. Ramesh, K., Karunanidhi, P.: Literature survey on algorithmic and non-algorithmic models for software development effort estimation. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2(3), 623–632 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tkachuk, M., Martinkus, I.: Model and tools for multi-dimensional approach to requirements behavior analysis. In: Kop, C. (ed.) UNISON 2012. LNBIP, vol. 137, pp. 191–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Saaty, T.L.: Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Garlan, D., Monroe, R., Wile, D.: ACME: an architecture description interchange language. In: Proceedings of CASCON 1997, Toronto, Canada, pp. 169–183 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Official Web-site of CIDE-project. http://wwwiti.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/iti_db/research/cide/

  33. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets. WorldSciBook (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Official Web-site of IDEF Family of Methods. http://www.idef.com

  35. Nagornyi, K.: Elaboration and usage of method for post object-oriented technologies effectiveness’s assessment. J. East-Eur. Adv. Technol. 63, 21–25 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Frunze Str., 21, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine

    Mykola Tkachuk, Konstiantyn Nagornyi & Rustam Gamzayev

Authors
  1. Mykola Tkachuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Konstiantyn Nagornyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rustam Gamzayev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mykola Tkachuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

    Vitaliy Yakovyna

  2. Institute of Applied Informatics, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Heinrich C. Mayr

  3. Taras Shevchenko National Univ. Kyi, Kyiv, Ukraine

    Mykola Nikitchenko

  4. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Grygoriy Zholtkevych

  5. Kherson State University, Kherson, Ukraine

    Aleksander Spivakovsky

  6. University of Huddersfield, Huddersfiled, United Kingdom

    Sotiris Batsakis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tkachuk, M., Nagornyi, K., Gamzayev, R. (2016). Models, Methods and Tools for Effectiveness Estimation of Post Object-Oriented Technologies in Software Maintenance. In: Yakovyna, V., Mayr, H., Nikitchenko, M., Zholtkevych, G., Spivakovsky, A., Batsakis, S. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications. ICTERI 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 594. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30246-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30246-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30245-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30246-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation