Skip to main content

Genetic Testing for Rare Cancer: The Wider Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rare Hereditary Cancers

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 205))

Abstract

Identification of a potential genetic susceptibility to cancer and confirmation of a pathogenic gene mutation raises a number of challenging issues for the patient with cancer, their relatives and the health professionals caring for them. The specific risks and management issues associated with rare cancer types have been addressed in the earlier chapters. This chapter considers the wider issues involved in genetic counselling and genetic testing for a genetic susceptibility to cancer for patients, families and health professionals. The first part of the chapter will present the issues raised by the current practice in genetic counselling and genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. The second part of the chapter will address some of the issues raised by the advances in genetic testing technology and the future opportunities provided by personalised medicine and targeted cancer therapy. Facilitating these developments requires closer integration of genomics into mainstream cancer care, challenging the existing paradigm of genetic medicine, adding additional layers of complexity to the risk assessment and management of cancer and presenting wider issues for patients, families, health professionals and clinical services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.geneticseducation.nhs.uk/for-practitioners-62/national-occupational-standards (last accessed 20.10.15).

  2. 2.

    https://www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk (last accessed 20.10.15).

  3. 3.

    https://www.abi.org.uk/News/News-releases/2011/04/Insurance-Genetics-Moratorium-extended-to-2017 (last accessed 16.11.15).

  4. 4.

    https://www.23andme.com/en-int/ (last accessed 01.05.15).

  5. 5.

    http://www.agnc.org.uk/information-education/documents,-websites-downloads/ (last accessed 16.11.15).

  6. 6.

    http://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/ (last accessed 21.09.15).

  7. 7.

    http://www.melbournegenomics.org.au/our-work/demonstration-project (last accessed 17.11.15).

References

  • Alexandrov BL, Nik-Zainai S, Wedge DC et al (2013) Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500(7463):415–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C et al (2014) BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: A report from the Australian ovarian cancer study group. J Clin Oncol 21:2654–2663

    Google Scholar 

  • ASHG (1975) Genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet 27:240–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayuso C, Millan J, Mancheno M, Dal-Re R (2013) Informed consent for whole-genome sequencing studies in the clinical setting. Proposed recommendations on essential content and process. Eur J Hum Genet 21(10):1054–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin JR, Belmont JW, Berg JS et al (2015) Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet 97(1):6–21

    Google Scholar 

  • British Society for Human Genetics (2010) Report on the genetic testing of children 2010. British Society for Human Genetics

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton A (2015) Are we ready for direct-to-consumer genetic testing? Lancet Neurol 14:138–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers Seymour K, Addlington-Hall J, Lucassen AM, Foster CL (2010) What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. J Genet Couns 19(4):330–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisitenhusz GM, Devriendt K, Peeters H et al (2014) The communication of secondary variants: interviews with parents whose children have undergone array-CHG testing Clin Genet 86(3):207–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A (2010) What is at stake in the predictive genetic testing of children? (2010). Fam Cancer 9(1):19–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels MS, Urbauer DL, Stanley JL et al (2009) Timing of BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing in women with ovarian cancer. Genet Med 11(9):624–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest K, Simpson SA, Wilson BJ et al (2003) To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clin Genet 64(4):317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Godino L, Skirton H (2012) A systematic review of nurses’ knowledge of genetics. J Nurs Educ Pract 2(3):173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW et al (2013) ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 15(7):565–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grover S, Stoffel EM, Bussone L et al (2004) Physician assessment of family cancer history and referral for genetic evaluation in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(9):813–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell N, Foster C, Eeles R et al (2004) Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer. Soc Sci Med 59(3):553–565

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords Science and Technology Committee (2009) Genomic medicine, 7 July

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C, Lerman C, Schwartz M et al (2002) All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters’ communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. Am J Med Genet 107(2):143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurvitz SA, Hu Y, O’Brien N, Finn RS (2013) Current approaches and future directions in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 39(3):219–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Julian-Reynier C, Eisinger F, Chabal F et al (1998) Cancer genetic clinics: why do women who already have cancer attend? Eur J Cancer 34(10):1549–1553

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanceley A, Eagle Z, Ogden G et al (2012) Family history and women with ovarian cancer: is it asked and does it matter?: an observational study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22(2):254–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiser B (2005) Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature. Psychooncology 14(12):1060–1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe A, Pumphrey R, Clifford C (2010) Hospice nurses and genetics: implications for end-of-life care. J Clin Nurs 19(1–2):192–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer LA, Anderson ME, Lacour RA et al (2010) Evaluating women with ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: missed opportunities. Obstet Gynecol 115(5):945–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie S, Smith JA, Senior V, Marteau TM et al (2003) Understanding why negative genetic test results sometimes fail to reassure. Am J Med Genet A 119A(3):340–347

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Familial Breast Cancer: classification and care of people at risk of familial breast cancer and management of breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer CG164, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman N (2014a) Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes. Nature 505:302–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman N (2014b) Mainstreaming genetic testing of cancer predisposition genes. Clin Med 14(4):436–439

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B et al (2015) American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol (Aug 31)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskoski RJR (2015) A historical overview of protein kinases and their targeted small molecule inhibitors. Pharmacol Res 100:1–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Physicians Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Human Genetics (2011) Consent and confidentiality in clinical genetic practice: guidance on genetic testing and sharing genetic information, 2nd edn. Report of the Joint Committee on Medical Genetics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuner M, Sieverding P, Shekelle P (2008) Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 299:1320–1334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott CL, Swisher EM, Kaufmann SH (2015) Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: recent advances and future development. J Clin Oncol 33(12):1397–1406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shked-Rafid S, Dheensa S, Crawford G et al (2014) Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice. J Med Genet 51(715):723 (Published online 16.09.14)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas F, Hennebelle I, Delmas C et al (2015) Genotyping of a family with a novel deleterious DPYD mutation supports the pretherapeutic screening of DPD deficiency with dihydrouracil/uracil ratio. Clin Pharmacol Ther. doi:10.1002/cpt.210 [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansenne F, Bossuyt PM, de Borgie CA (2009) Evaluating the psychological effects of genetic testing in symptomatic patients: a systematic review. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 13:555–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright CF, Middleton A, Burton H (2013) Policy challenges of clinical genome sequencing. BMJ 2013:347–353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Jacobs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacobs, C., Pichert, G. (2016). Genetic Testing for Rare Cancer: The Wider Issues. In: Pichert, G., Jacobs, C. (eds) Rare Hereditary Cancers. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 205. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29998-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29998-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29996-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29998-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics