Abstract
The objective of this work is to examine the factorial structure and the internal consistency of a Spanish version of the Purpose in Life Test, to propose an accurate psychometric scale. Results of a previous study, in which exploratory factor analysis resulted in a scale with ten items and two correlated factors, are developed. In the current study a confirmatory factor analysis is carried out and internal consistency was estimated among 916 Spanish undergraduates (264 males, 652 females, aged 18–42, M = 22.33, SD = 4.26). The results supported the proposed model, which showed a good fit and a high internal consistency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brunelli, C., Bianchi, E., Murru, L., Monformoso, P., Bosisio, M., Gangeri, L., Miccinesi, G., Scrignaro, M., Ripamonti, C., & Borreani, C. (2012). Italian validation of the Purpose In Life (PIL) test and the Seeking Of Noetic Goals (SONG) test in a population of cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011, 2775–2783.
Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 200–207. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(196404)20:2<200::AID-JCLP2270200203>3.0.CO;2-U
Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1969). Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life Test. Saratoga, CA: Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy.
Dufton, B. C., & Perlman, D. (1986). The association between religiosity and the Purpose in Life Test: Does it reflect purpose or satisfaction? Journal of Psychology and Theology, 14, 42–48.
Frankl, V. E. (2010). The feeling of meaninglessness. A challenge to psychotherapy and philosophy. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
García-Alandete, J. (2014). Análisis factorial confirmatorio y confiabilidad de una versión española del Purpose in Life Test y diferencias en función del género y la edad [Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability of a Spanish version of the Purpose in Life Test, and gender and age differences]. Pensamiento Psicológico, 12(1), 83–98.
García-Alandete, J., Rosa, E., & Sellés, P. (2013). Estructura factorial y consistencia interna de una versión española del Purpose in Life Test [Factorial Structure and Internal Consistency of a Spanish Version of the Purpose in Life Test]. Universitas Psychologica, 12(2), 517–530. doi:10.11144/Javeriana. UPSY12-2.efci.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Haugan, G., & Moknes, U. K. (2013). Meaning-in-Life in nursing home patients: A validation study of the Purpose in Life Test. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 21(2), 296–319. doi:10.1891/1061-3749.21.2.296.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
Jonsén, E., Fagerström, L., Lundman, B., Nygren, B., Vähäkangas, M., & Strandberg, G. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Purpose in Life Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24(1), 41–48. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00682.x.
Magaña, L., Zavala, M. A., Ibarra, I., Gómez, M. T., & Gómez, M. M. (2004). El sentido de la vida en estudiantes de primer semestre de la Universidad de La Salle Bajío [The meaning in life among students of first semester of the Universidad de La Salle Bajío]. Revista del Centro de Investigación, 6(22), 5–13.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indexes: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315–353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marsh, A., Smith, L., Piek, J., & Saunders, B. (2003). The Purpose In Life Scale: Psychometric properties for social drinkers and drinkers in alcohol treatment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5), 859–871. doi:10.1177/0013164402251040.
McDonald, R. P. (1989). An index of goodness-of-fit based on non-centrality. Journal of Classification, 6(1), 97–103. doi:10.1007/BF01908590.
McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Non-centrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 247–255. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.247.
McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 494–512. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.2.494.
Melton, A. M. A., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2008). On the measurement of meaning: Logotherapy’s empirical contributions to Humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 36(1), 31–44. doi:10.1080/08873260701828870.
Molcar, C. C., & Stuempfig, D. W. (1988). Effects of world view on purpose in life. The Journal of Psychology, 122, 365–371. doi:10.1080/00223980.1988.9915523.
Morgan, J. E., & Farsides, T. L. (2009). Measuring meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(2), 197–214. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9075-0.
Noblejas, M. A. (1994). Logoterapia. Fundamentos, principios y aplicación. Una experiencia de evaluación del “Logro interior de sentido” [Logotherapy. Foundations, principles, and application. An experience of assessment of the ‘internal achievement of meaning’] (Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain). Retrieved from http://eprints.ucm.es/tesis/19911996/S/5/S5005701.pdf
Risco, A. (2009). Sentido de la vida: Evolución e implicaciones para la Educación Superior [Meaning in life: Development and implications for Higher Education] (Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain). Retrieved from: https://www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/imprimirFicheroTesis.do?fichero=12007
Rosa, E., García-Alandete, J., Sellés, P., Bernabé, G., & Soucase, B. (2012). Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio de los principales modelos propuestos para el Purpose in Life Test en una muestra de universitarios españoles [Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the main models proposed for the Purpose in Life Test among Spanish undergraduates]. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 15(1), 67–76.
Schulenberg, S. E., & Melton, A. M. A. (2010). A confirmatory factor-analytic evaluation of the Purpose in Life Test: Preliminary psychometric support for a replicable two-factor model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(1), 95–111. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9124-3.
Schulenberg, S. E., Schnetzer, L. W., & Buchanan, E. M. (2010). The Purpose in Life Test-Short Form: Development and psychometric support. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 861–876. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9231-9.
Shek, D. T. L. (1988). Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the Purpose in Life Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 384–392. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<384::AID-JCLP2270440312>3.0.CO;2-1.
Steger, M. F. (2006). An illustration of issues in factor extraction and identification of dimensionality in psychological assessment data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 263–272.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25(2), 173–180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ullman, J. B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (pp. 709–819). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Ullman, J., & Bentler, P. (2004). Structural equation modeling. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 431–459). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608184.n19.
Waisberg, J. L., & Starr, M. W. (1999). Psychometric properties of the Purpose in Life Test with a sample of substance abusers. International Forum for Logotherapy, 22, 22–26.
Walters, L. H., & Klein, A. E. (1980). A cross-validated investigation of the Crumbaugh Purpose in Life Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 1065–1071. doi:10.1177/001316448004000434.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Purpose in Life Test, Part A (Crumbaugh and Maholick 1969; Spanish translation, Noblejas 1994)
Appendix: Purpose in Life Test, Part A (Crumbaugh and Maholick 1969; Spanish translation, Noblejas 1994)
-
1.
Generalmente me encuentro: Completamente aburrido/Exuberante, entusiasmado.
-
2.
La vida me parece: Completamente rutinaria / Siempre emocionante.
-
3.
En la vida tengo: Ninguna meta o anhelo / Muchas metas y anhelos definidos.
-
4.
Mi existencia personal es: Sin sentido ni propósito / Llena de sentidos y propósitos.
-
5.
Cada día es: Exactamente igual/Siempre nuevo y diferente.
-
6.
Si pudiera elegir: Nunca habría nacido / Tendría otras nueve vidas iguales a ésta.
-
7.
Después de retirarme: Holgazanearía el resto de mi vida / Haría las cosas emocionantes que siempre deseé realizar.
-
8.
En el logro de mis metas vitales: No he conseguido ningún progreso/He llegado a mi realización completa.
-
9.
Mi vida es: Vacía y llena de desesperación/Un conjunto de cosas buenas y emocionantes.
-
10.
Si muriera hoy, me parecería que mi vida ha sido: Una completa basura/Muy valiosa.
-
11.
Al pensar en mi propia vida: Me pregunto a menudo la razón por la que existo / Siempre encuentro razones para vivir.
-
12.
Tal y como yo lo veo en relación con mi vida, el mundo: Me confunde por completo / Se adapta significativamente a mi vida.
-
13.
Me considero: Una persona irresponsable / Una persona muy responsable.
-
14.
Con respecto a la libertad de que dispone para hacer sus propias elecciones, creo que el hombre es: Completamente esclavo de las limitaciones de la herencia y del ambiente / Absolutamente libre de hacer todas sus elecciones vitales.
-
15.
Con respecto a la muerte, estoy: Falto de preparación y atemorizado / Preparado y sin temor.
-
16.
Con respecto al suicidio: Lo he considerado seriamente como una salida a mi situación / Nunca le he dedicado un segundo pensamiento.
-
17.
Considero que mi capacidad para encontrar un significado, un propósito o una misión en la vida es: Prácticamente nula / Muy grande.
-
18.
Mi vida está: Fuera de mis manos y controlada por factores externos / En mis manos y bajo mi control.
-
19.
Enfrentarme a mis tareas cotidianas supone: Una experiencia dolorosa y aburrida / Una fuente de placer y satisfacción.
-
20.
He descubierto: Ninguna misión o propósito en mi vida / Metas claras y un propósito satisfactorio para mi vida.
Items and points 1 and 7 anchors (anchor point 4 is Neutral and the rest of points lack anchor).
In bold, the items that compose the PIL-10.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
García-Alandete, J., Martínez, E.R., Nohales, P.S., Valero, G.B., Lozano, B.S. (2016). The Structural Validity and Internal Consistency of a Spanish Version of the Purpose in Life Test . In: Batthyány, A. (eds) Logotherapy and Existential Analysis. Logotherapy and Existential Analysis: Proceedings of the Viktor Frankl Institute Vienna, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29424-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29424-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29423-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29424-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)