Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Conceptual Framework for Studying Gender in Information Systems Research

  • Chapter
Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems

Abstract

Approaching the issue of Information Systems (IS) from an innovation perspective (Quintas, 1996), this paper seeks to enhance our understanding of IS process by introducing theoretical concepts and observations advanced in sociology and technology management disciplines under the heading of ‘Social Studies of Technology’ (SST).1 Specifically, the proposal of the paper is that a focus on gender within this approach will mean an increased awareness of organisational and social concerns of both the IS development process and the consequences of IS deployment into organisations. In so doing, I am assuming, in line with significant feminist research elsewhere, that gender relations involve difference, inequality and power. This is deemed pertinent to access to, and control over, material and symbolic resources (Knights and Willmott, 1986).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adam, A. (1997). What Should We Do With Cyberfeminism?, in R. Lander and A. Adam (eds.) Women in Computing, Exeter: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, A. (2002). Exploring the Gender Question in Critical Information Systems, Journal of Information Technology 17(2): 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, A, Emms, J, Green, E and Owen, J. (eds.) (1994). Women, Work and Computerization: Breaking old boundaries — building new forms, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, A, Howcroft, D and Richardson, H. (2002). Guest Editorial, Information Technology and People 15(2): 94–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akrich, M. (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects, in W. Bijker and J. Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M and Billing, YD. (1997). Understanding Gender and Organizations, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroudi, J and Igbaria, M. (1995). The Impact of Job Performance Evaluations on Career Advancement Prospects: An examination of gender differences in the information systems workplace, MIS Quarterly 19(1): 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroudi, J and Truman, G. (1994). Gender Differences in the Information Systems Management Ranks: An assessment of potential discriminatory practices, MIS Quarterly 18(2): 129–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and Monopoly Capital, New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne, J and Reynolds, M. (1997). Managing Learning, Integrating Perspectives in Theory and Practice, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke Leacock, E. (1981). Myths of Male Dominance, New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Briuec Bay, in J. Law (ed.) Power: Action and Belief, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, N. (1989). The roots of gay oppression, International Socialist Journal 2: 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. (1983). Brothers, Male Dominance and Technological Change, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. (1986). Machinery of Dominance: Women, men and technical knowledge, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. (1988). The Gendering of Jobs: Workplace relations and the reproduction of sex segregation, in S. Walby (ed.) Gender Segregation at Work, Milton Keynes: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C and Omerod, S. (1993). Gender and Technology in the Making, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. (1995). Gender and the Professional Predicament in Nursing, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C and Rosser, J. (1986). Gendered Jobs in the Health Service: A problem for labour process analysis, in D. Knights and H. Willmott (eds.) Gender and the Labour Process, Hampshire: Gower Publishing Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, WH, Mackenzie, D, Shapiro, S and Peltu, M. (1995). Computer Power and Human Limits: Learning from IT and telecommunications disasters, Programme on Information and Communication Technology Policy Research Paper No. 33, Brunel University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (2001). Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State. (Translator: Ernest Unterman), Tennessee: University Press of the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, W and Arnold, E. (eds.) (1985). Smothered By Invention: Technology in women’s lives, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerver, E. (1989). Computers and Gender, in T. Forrester (ed.) Computers in the Human Context, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E, Owen, J and Pain, D. (eds.) (1993). Gendered by Design: Information technology and office systems, London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K and Gill, R. (eds.) (1995). The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary theory and research, London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, F. (1996). Women and Computers, Exeter: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henwood, F, Plumeridge, S and Stepulevage, L. (2001). A Tale of Two Cultures, in S. Wyatt, F. Henwood, N. Miller and P. Senker (eds.) Technology and In/equality, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howcroft, D and Wilson, M. (2003). Paradoxes of Participatory Practices: The Janus role of the systems developer, Information and Organization 13(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, TP. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpf, A. (1987). Recent Feminist Approaches to Women and Technology, in M. McNeil (ed.) Gender and Expertise, London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D and Murray, F. (1994). Managers Divided, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D and Willmott, H. (eds.) (1986). Gender and the Labour Process, Hampshire: Gower Publishing Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, R and Adam, A. (1997). Women in Computing, Exeter: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action Milton Keynes, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1987). Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion, in W. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems, London: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledwith, S and Colgan, F. (1996). Women in Organisations: Challenging gender politics, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J and Wilson, D. (2001). Developing Women in a Digital World, Women in Management Review 16(8): 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. (1984). Man of Reason: Male and Female in Western philosophy, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view, London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D and Wajcman, J. (eds.) (1985). The Social Shaping of Technology, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, A, Blomqvist, M and Vehvilainen, M. (1993). Gendering Computer Work: An international perspective, AI and Society 8: 280–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, A. (2001). A solution to the IT skills shortage, Women in Computing, Financial Times, 22 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (1984). Forces of Production: A social history of industrial automation, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A and Taylor, B. (1980). Sex and Skill: Notes towards a feminist economics, Feminist Review 6: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, TJ and Bijker, WE. (1987). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit One Another, in W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and T.J. Pinch (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quicke, S. (2001). Where did all the IT girls go? The crisis in recruitment in the technology industry, The Independent, 19 November, p 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintas, P. (1996). Software By Design, in R. Mansell and R. Silverstone (eds.) Communication By Design: The Politics of ICT’s, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, B and Hapnes, T. (1991). Excluding Women from the Technologies of the Future?, Futures December: 1107–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, J and Fagan, C. (1994). Occupational Segregation: Plus ca change…?, in R. Lindley (ed.) Labour Market Structures and Prospects for Women, Manchester: Equal Opportunities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. (1994). Is the Future Female? Troubled Thoughts on Contemporary Feminism, (2nd ed) London: Virago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz Cowan, R. (1985). How the Refrigerator Got Its Hum, in D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman (eds.) The Social Shaping of Technology, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (1997). Different for Girls: How culture creates women, London: Chatto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snizek, W and Neil, C. (1992). Job characteristics, gender stereotypes and perceived gender discrimination in the workplace, Organization Studies 13(3): 403–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, D. (2000). Braverman and the Contribution of Labour Process Analysis to the Critique of Capitalist Production — Twenty Five Years On, Work, Employment and Society 14(2): 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, SL. (1995). The Politics of Formal Representations: Wizards, gurus and organisational complexity, in S.L. Star (ed.) Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology, Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (1980). No Nature, No Culture: The Hagen case, in C. MacCormack and M. Strathern (eds.) Nature, Culture and Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauth, E. (2002). Odd Girl Out: An individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession, Information Technology and People 15(2): 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zoonen, L. (1992). Feminist Theory and Information Technology, Media, Culture and Society 14: 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H. (2001). ‘Hewitt calls for more IT women’, Computer Weekly, 18th October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, I. (1993). Women’s Voice: the case of nursing information systems, AI and Society 7: 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism Confronts Technology, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (1995). Feminist Theories of Technology, in S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds.) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2000). Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: in what state is the art? Social Studies of Science 30(3): 447–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (ed.). (1988). Gender Segregation at Work, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. (1990). Office Automation: The labour process and women’s work in Britain, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. (1996). Shaping Women’s Work: Gender employment and information technology, London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R and Edge, D. (1996). The Social Shaping of Technology, Research Policy 25: 865–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2002). Making Nursing Visible? Gender, Technology and the Care Plan as Script, Information Technology and People 15(2): 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M and Howcroft, D. (2002). Conceptualising Information Systems Failure: A social shaping approach, European Journal of Information Systems 11(4): 236–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, UK

    Melanie Wilson

Authors
  1. Melanie Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

    Leslie P. Willcocks

  2. Oxford University, Oxford, UK

    Chris Sauer

  3. University of Missouri-St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA

    Mary C. Lacity

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Association for Information Technology Trust

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, M. (2016). A Conceptual Framework for Studying Gender in Information Systems Research. In: Willcocks, L.P., Sauer, C., Lacity, M.C. (eds) Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29272-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation