Skip to main content

Fuzzy Logic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligent Techniques for Data Science

Abstract

Set is defined as a collection of entities that share common characteristics. From the formal definition of the set, it can be easily determined whether an entity can be member of the set or not. Classically, when an entity satisfies the definition of the set completely, then the entity is a member of the set. Such membership is certain in nature and it is very clear that an entity either belongs to the set or not. There is no intermediate situation. Thus, the classical sets handle bi-state situations and sets membership results in either ‘true’ or ‘false’ status only. These types of sets are also known as crisp sets. In other words, a crisp set always has a pre-defined boundary associated with it. A member must fall within the boundary to become a valid member of the set. An example of such classical set is the number of students in a class, ‘Student’. Students who have enrolled themselves for the class by paying fees and following rules are the valid members of the class ‘Student’. The class ‘Student’ is crisp, finite and non-negative. Here are some types of crisp sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    dblp.uni-trier.de/

  2. 2.

    https://code.google.com/p/funzy/

  3. 3.

    http://fuzzyengine.sourceforge.net/

  4. 4.

    http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/frbs/index.html

  5. 5.

    http://pyfuzzy.sourceforge.net/

  6. 6.

    http://www.mathlab.mtu.edu/

  7. 7.

    http://www.bliasoft.com/data-mining-software-examples.html

  8. 8.

    http://www.unisoftwareplus.com/products/mlf/

  9. 9.

    http://www.predx.com/

References

  • Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghali, N., Panda, M., Hassanien, A. E., Abraham, A., & Snasel, V. (2012). Social networks analysis: Tools, measures. In A. Abraham (Ed.), Social networks analysis: Tools, measures (pp. 3–23). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, B., von Altrock, C., & Pozybill, M. (1997). Fuzzy logic data analysis of environmental data for traffic control. 6th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (pp. 835–838). Aachen: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, E. H. (1974). Applications of fuzzy algorithm for control of simple dynamic plant. The Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 121(12), 1585–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsuishi, T., Wasaki, K., & Shidama, Y. (2001). Basic properties of fuzzy set operation and membership function. Formalized Mathematics, 9(2), 357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajja, P. S. (2010). Type-2 fuzzy interface for artificial neural network. In K. Anbumani & R.Nedunchezhian (Eds.), Soft computing applications for database technologies: Techniques and issues (pp. 72–92). Hershey: IGI Global Book Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salski, A. (1999). Fuzzy logic approach to data analysis and ecological modelling. 7th European congress on intelligent techniques & soft computing. Aachen: Verlag Mainz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1985). Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 15(1), 116–132.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, 8, 199–249.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Akerkar, R., Sajja, P.S. (2016). Fuzzy Logic. In: Intelligent Techniques for Data Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29206-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29206-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29205-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29206-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics