Abstract
Set is defined as a collection of entities that share common characteristics. From the formal definition of the set, it can be easily determined whether an entity can be member of the set or not. Classically, when an entity satisfies the definition of the set completely, then the entity is a member of the set. Such membership is certain in nature and it is very clear that an entity either belongs to the set or not. There is no intermediate situation. Thus, the classical sets handle bi-state situations and sets membership results in either ‘true’ or ‘false’ status only. These types of sets are also known as crisp sets. In other words, a crisp set always has a pre-defined boundary associated with it. A member must fall within the boundary to become a valid member of the set. An example of such classical set is the number of students in a class, ‘Student’. Students who have enrolled themselves for the class by paying fees and following rules are the valid members of the class ‘Student’. The class ‘Student’ is crisp, finite and non-negative. Here are some types of crisp sets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
References
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7), 107–117.
Ghali, N., Panda, M., Hassanien, A. E., Abraham, A., & Snasel, V. (2012). Social networks analysis: Tools, measures. In A. Abraham (Ed.), Social networks analysis: Tools, measures (pp. 3–23). London: Springer.
Krause, B., von Altrock, C., & Pozybill, M. (1997). Fuzzy logic data analysis of environmental data for traffic control. 6th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (pp. 835–838). Aachen: IEEE.
Mamdani, E. H. (1974). Applications of fuzzy algorithm for control of simple dynamic plant. The Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 121(12), 1585–1588.
Mitsuishi, T., Wasaki, K., & Shidama, Y. (2001). Basic properties of fuzzy set operation and membership function. Formalized Mathematics, 9(2), 357–362.
Sajja, P. S. (2010). Type-2 fuzzy interface for artificial neural network. In K. Anbumani & R.Nedunchezhian (Eds.), Soft computing applications for database technologies: Techniques and issues (pp. 72–92). Hershey: IGI Global Book Publishing.
Salski, A. (1999). Fuzzy logic approach to data analysis and ecological modelling. 7th European congress on intelligent techniques & soft computing. Aachen: Verlag Mainz.
Takagi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1985). Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 15(1), 116–132.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, 8, 199–249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Akerkar, R., Sajja, P.S. (2016). Fuzzy Logic. In: Intelligent Techniques for Data Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29206-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29206-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29205-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29206-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)