Abstract
A number of research projects aim at air traffic control independent from the controller’s location and his outside view. In the context of one of these projects—VICTOR (Virtual Control Tower Research Studies), which was initiated by the German air navigation service provider Deutsche Flugsicherung (DFS), a completely new concept of Aerodrome Remote Control Center (ARCC) was investigated. In contrast to previous approaches, the ARCC concept broadened the monitoring and controlling capabilities of the tower controller towards several airports at the same time. It thereby created new requirements for air traffic control, i.e. an eminent need for planning the air traffic flow of multiple airports. For this additional task, the concept of a planning tool was developed taking into consideration a user-centered approach, the guidelines for usable interfaces and a well perceived user experience. Following these Human Factors standards, our planning tool was developed to be useful and ensure safe handling, but also to look and feel good. For its evaluation, an analytical inspection method, i.e. heuristic evaluation, has been used as well as a questionnaire assessing the aesthetics of the graphical user interface. Eight usability experts assessed the tool, taking notes of any peculiarities and usability problems and carrying out the associated severity rating. With the help of this methodology, 56 issues were identified and corrected. Furthermore, results from additional qualitative statements of the experts for development and optimisation of the user interface were subsequently used for redesign. In terms of looks, the planning tool scored above average in aesthetics ratings. This chapter briefly introduces the tool and its design, and subsequently focuses on our evaluation procedure and results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AIRBUS SAS (2013) Global Market Forecast 2013–2032. http://www.airbus.com/company/market/forecast/. Accessed 4 Jan 2014
Baumann K, Lanz H (1998) Mesch-Maschine-Schnittstellen elektronischer Geräte. Leitfaden für Design und Schaltungstechnik. Springer, Berlin
Bergner J, König C, Hofmann T, Ebert H (2009) An integrated arrival and departure display for the tower controller. In: Proceedings of 9th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations conference, Hilton Head, SC, USA
DIN EN ISO 9241–11:1999–01. Teil 11: Leitsätze an die Gebrauchstauglichkeit. Beuth-Verlag, Berlin
DIN EN ISO 9241–110:2008–09. Teil 110: Grundsätze der Dialoggestaltung. Beuth-Verlag, Berlin
DIN EN ISO 9241–210:2010–06. Teil 210: Prozess zur Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher interaktiver Systeme. Beuth-Verlag, Berlin
Dumke R (2001) Software engineering, 3rd edn. Vieweg-Verlag, Braunschweig
EU (2004) Regulation (EC) No. 550/2004 of the European parliament and of the council of 10 March 2004 on the provision of air navigation services in the single European sky (the service provision regulation). Off J Eur Union No. L 96/10, 31 Mar 2004, p 10
Hassenzahl M (2003). The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Blythe M, Overbeeke C, Monk AF, Wright PC (eds) Funology: from usability to enjoyment. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 31–42
Hassenzahl M (2008) User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference of the association francophone d’interaction homme-machine, pp 11–15. doi:10.1145/1512714.1512717
Hassenzahl M, Tractinsky N (2006) User experience—a research agenda. Behav Inform Technol 25:91–97
Hirschfeld G, Thielsch MT (2015) Establishing meaningful cut points for online user ratings. Ergonomics 58(2):310–320
IATA (2014) New IATA passenger forecast reveals fast-growing markets of the future. Press Release No. 57, 16 Oct. http://www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/pages/2014-10-16-01.aspx. Accessed 6 June 2015
Karat C-M (1994) A comparison of user interface evaluation methods. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL (eds) Usability inspection methods. Wiley, New York, pp 203–233
Karat C, Campbell R, Fliegel T (1992) Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. In: Bauersfeld P, Bennett J, Lynch G (Hrsg) Proceedings of ACM CHI’92 conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, S 397–404
Karrer K, Glaser C, Clemens C, Bruder C (2009) Technikaffinität erfassen—der Fragebogen TA-EG. Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme 8:196–201
Lehr AT (2011) Lernen am Computer. Reihe Technologie-gestütztes Lernen, Band 1–2011. Steinbeis-Edition, Stuttgart
Leitner R, Jürgensohn T (2014a) Entwicklung einer grafischen Benutzeroberfläche zur Fernüberwachung mehrerer Flughäfen. In: Wendemuth A, Jipp M, Kluge A, Söffker D (Hrsg) 3. Interdisziplinärer Workshop Kognitive Systeme: Mensch, Teams, Systeme und Automaten, März 2014, Magdeburg, pp 25–27
Leitner R, Jürgensohn T (2014b) MasterMAN—Assistenzsystem zur Fernüberwachung von Regionalflughäfen im Multi-Airport-Betrieb. In: Grandt M, Schmerwitz S (Hrsg). 56. Fachausschusssitzung Anthropotechnik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt—Lilienthal-Oberth e.V.: Der Mensch zwischen Automatisierung, Kompetenz und Verantwortung, Ottobrunn, 14.-15.Oktober. DGLR-Bericht 2014–01
Leitner R, Oehme A, Schulz-Rueckert D (2011) Planning multi-airport traffic control—requirements and design implications. In: Schmid S, Elepfandt M, Adenauer J, Lichtenstein A (Hrsg). Reflexionen und Visionen der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion—Aus der Vergangenheit lernen, Zukunft gestalten.- 9. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme, Berlin, 5.-7. Oktober 2011. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Düsseldorf, VDI Verlag
Lindgaard G, Dudek C (2003) What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interact Comput 15:429–452
Moser C (2012) User experience design. Springer, Berlin
Moshagen M, Musch J, Göritz AS (2009) A blessing, not a curse: experimental evidence for beneficial effects of visual aesthetics on performance. Ergonomics 52:1311–1320
Nielsen J (1992) Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proceedings ACM CHI’92 Conference, S. 373–380, 3. -7. Mai, Monterey, CA
Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Academic, Cambridge, MA
Nielsen J (1994) Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL (eds) Usability inspection methods. Wiley, New York, pp 25–62
Nielsen J, Landauer TK (1993) A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI’93 conference, 24–29 Apr, Amsterdam, Niederlande, S 206–213
Nielsen J, Molich R (1990) Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings ACM CHI’90 conference, 1–5 Apr, Seattle, WA, S 249–256
Norman DA (1988) The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New York
Oehme A, Schulz-Rückert D (2010) Distant air traffic control for regional airports. In: 11th IFAC-symposium: analysis, design, and evaluation of human- machine systems, vol 11(1), Valencienne, France, S 141–145
Oehme A, Leitner R, Wittbrodt N (2013) Challenges of multiple airport control—experimental investigation of a multiairport control concept. In: Harris D (Hrsg) Aviation psychology and applied human factors, Hogrefe, Göttingen, S 1–8
Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2002) Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA
Sarodnick F, Brau H (2011) Methoden der usability evaluation. 2. Überarbeitete Auflage. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern
Shneiderman B (2002) User interface design. 3. Auflage (Deutsche Ausgabe). mitp-Verlag, Bonn
Shneiderman B, Plaisant C (2010) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 5th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Somervell J, McCrickard DS (2005) Better discount evaluation: illustrating how critical parameters support heuristic creation. Interact Comput 17(5):592–612
Tan W-S, Liu D, Bishu R (2009) Web evaluation: heuristic evaluation vs user testing. Int J Ind Ergon 39:621–627
Thielsch MT, Moshagen M (2011) Erfassung visueller Ästhetik mit dem VisAWI. Usability Professionals, 260–265
Thüring M, Mahlke S (2007) Usability, aesthetics, and emotions in human-technology interaction. Int J Psychol 42(4):253–264
Tullis T, Albert B (2008) Measuring the user experience. Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Morgan Kaufmann, New York
Virzi RA (1992) Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum Factors 34(4):457–468
Wilson C (2014) User interface inspection methods: a user-centered design method. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, MA
Wittbrodt N (2012) Bord-Boden-Kommunikation im Multi-Flugplatz- Betrieb. Dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin. Available at: http://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-tuberlin/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3588
Woolrych A, Cockton G (2001) Why and when five test users aren’t enough. In: Proceedings of IHM-HCI 2001 conference, 2, 10–14 Sept, Lille, Frankreich, S 105–108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leitner, R., Oehme, A. (2016). Planning Remote Multi-Airport Control—Design and Evaluation of a Controller-Friendly Assistance System. In: Fürstenau, N. (eds) Virtual and Remote Control Tower. Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28717-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28719-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)